Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Miles Archer

(24,338 posts)
Sat Sep 13, 2025, 08:33 PM Sep 2025

Allegedly Celebrating-Gate....doxxing those who FAIL TO SPEAK in REVERENT TONES about SAINT CHUCKY.

People are getting fired for allegedly celebrating Charlie Kirk’s murder. It looks like a coordinated effort

https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/13/business/charlie-kirk-death-fired-comments

Dozens of social media posts and messages about the murder of Charlie Kirk, including some that celebrated his death, are being spotlighted by conservative activists, Republican elected officials and a doxxing website as part of an online campaign to punish the posters behind the messages.

Prominent far-right influencer Laura Loomer, a US senator, and a site called “Expose Charlie’s Murderers” have all drawn attention to people who have posted messages about Kirk’s Wednesday assassination.

The campaigns show how social media posts or personal messages — even by accounts with few followers or from people who are not public figures — could easily be surfaced and publicized, and people’s personal information can be spread across the internet at a time when doxxing is easier than ever.

The Charlie’s Murderers site, whose domain was registered anonymously and which says it is not a doxxing site, claims it has “received nearly 30,000 submissions,” according to a message on the site’s front page on midday Saturday. Currently, there are a few dozen submissions published on the site. “This website will soon be converted into a searchable database of all 30,000 submissions, filterable by general location and job industry. This is a permanent and continuously-updating archive of Radical activists calling for violence.”

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

LonePirate

(14,379 posts)
2. It all depends ...
Sat Sep 13, 2025, 09:56 PM
Sep 2025

For Repubs, cancel culture is bad when it impacts people they like. However, cancel culture is good when it affects people they dislike.

Jack Valentino

(5,252 posts)
4. It clearly IS a doxxing site, and if the web host gets enough complaints about it,
Sat Sep 13, 2025, 10:26 PM
Sep 2025

they are likely to shut it down... particularly if the web host themselves become subject to attack on social media for hosting this site...


I'll leave it to others to research the host and their contact information,
I'm out of practice for that...

LeftInTX

(34,852 posts)
6. Thread about it on Reddit
Sat Sep 13, 2025, 11:30 PM
Sep 2025
https://www.reddit.com/r/thebulwark/comments/1nezex3/chilling_anonymous_website_for_doxxing_people/

They think Squarespace is the host


This site is hosted on Squarespace and it violates at least two points of the Squarespace Acceptable Use Policy (https://www.squarespace.com/acceptable-use-policy):

6.1. Don’t threaten, harass, or abuse any individuals.

6.2. Don’t incite violence.

You can report this to them by emailing abuse@squarespace.com.

Wiz Imp

(10,428 posts)
7. "This is a permanent and continuously-updating archive of Radical activists calling for violence."
Sat Sep 13, 2025, 11:51 PM
Sep 2025

So it's going to include Donald Trump, Laura Loomer, Steve Bannon, Elon Musk, Jesse Watters, Matt Walsh, Stephen Miller, Katie Miller, Christopher Rufo, Matt Forney, Nick Freitas, Stewart Rhodes, Alex Jones, Chaya Raichik, Nancy Mace, Mike Cernovich, Ryan Sánchez, Enrique Tarrio, Jessica Watkins, Brian Kilmeade, Ainsley Earhardt, Lawrence Jones, Clay Higgins, Christopher Landau, Derrick Van Orden, etc., etc., etc.???

Wiz Imp

(10,428 posts)
8. For those Federal employees or military members they are going after...a lawsuit will be coming
Sat Sep 13, 2025, 11:55 PM
Sep 2025
In a 1987 case, the Supreme Court decided that it was constitutionally protected speech, and not grounds for firing, for a government employee to tell her co-workers she was sorry that a would-be assassin failed to kill President Reagan.

Wiz Imp

(10,428 posts)
10. These people are pathetic. According to them, now criticizing someone is celebrating their death?
Sun Sep 14, 2025, 12:47 AM
Sep 2025

Well, we knew they weren't very bright.

Things people have gotten fired or death threats for saying (supposedly celebrating Kirk's death):

“Save your sympathies for the innocent bystanders caught in the crossfire of MAGA’s violent political messaging machine.”


“Hope the bullet’s OK.”


"America became greater today"


"Good riddance"


“This may not be the obituary we were all hoping to wake up to, but it is a close second for me.”


“37 years in public education, ready to take a bullet for my kids. No I’m not shedding a tear, he chose to sacrifice himself for the rights [to] be protected. Karma’s a bitch.”


“Hateful thoughts lead to hateful words, which then lead to hateful actions. “You can’t stop with these sort of awful thoughts you have and then saying these awful words and then not expect awful actions to take place.”


“Why are y’all sad? Your man said it was worth it,”


“Truly don’t care if you think it’s insensitive or poor timing to decline to respect an evil man who died.”


"Yes I am making his death political, no I do not care, If all you do is spew hate, you're bound to get some in return."


"Charlie Kirk died the same way he lived: bringing out the worst in people,"


"Could this have been the consequences of his actions catching up with him?"


"#karma is a b*tch,"


"Good riddance to bad garbage,"


None of those quotes are "celebratory". The only 2 that could even be considered remotely close are "America became greater today" and “This may not be the obituary we were all hoping to wake up to, but it is a close second for me.” This should scare everyone that people are getting fired just because they dared to say something critical or negative about a truly hateful bigot. What's worse, is many of them simply pointed out the hateful things that Kirk himself said. It's Censorship of anything the slightest bit critical of right wing politics and they're clearly trying to completely silence all opposing viewpoints.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Allegedly Celebrating-Gat...