General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGeorge Will Compares Kirk To Buckley, Means It As Compliment -- Gary Legum
https://www.wonkette.com/p/george-will-compares-kirk-to-buckleyAlso, George Will is still alive? Good for him.

Now, we understand that the USPS is going to sometimes make stamps celebrating bigots because otherwise it would be eliminating an enormous pool of historical Americans to honor. The nations history is littered with milkshake ducks, and we have made peace with this state of affairs. We probably wouldnt have even noticed the event, or if we had we wouldnt have cared because there is only but so much outrage to go around, and it has been a week.
Then some nut shot Charlie Kirk, which motivated George Will to write an entire column for The Washington Post favorably comparing the two smug weirdos. To which the only possible response is, when is that asshole George Will going to retire? We thought he was an old dinosaur when we were reading his Newsweek columns 30 years ago, back when Newsweek was a respectable publication. Somehow, hes still getting people to pay him for his stentorian pronouncements like the worlds dullest carnival barker.
. . .
White men like George Will, who finished Mondays column by calling Charlie Kirk like Buckley, a teacher unconfined to a classroom. And they both did it well. Bigotry is learned behavior; it has to be carefully taught.
JCMach1
(29,228 posts)A sentence I never thought I would have to say.
Elessar Zappa
(16,385 posts)He was a pompous asshole.
House of Roberts
(6,565 posts)Really? This is the first I've heard that. (I had to look up what was a milkshake duck.)
Abstractartist
(447 posts)I can compare both Buckley and Kirk.
They both are not around to spread their bigotry and racism.
Ok, Im done with Charlie Kirk. Lets get back to another dead figure in the trump shitshow
Epstein
.. release the files.
sop
(18,897 posts)It would have been interesting watching Charlie Kirk actually debate the likes of James Baldwin or Gore Vidal.
erronis
(24,110 posts)Wiz Imp
(10,174 posts)He really wasn't that good at real debating. He was only good at bullying. When he'd debate someone who he couldn't bully into submission, he looked like a moron.
Ritabert
(2,504 posts)His political commentary is pathetic.
gulliver
(14,035 posts)We really, really need to get a handle on it. Certainly, I don't hear any Democratic leaders using the term "bigot." So, the folks who insist on using it are, by definition, speaking for themselves, not Democrats (which I am).
I can excuse the word "bigot" if it is used in sentences that make fun of someone who uses the word "bigot." Otherwise, my acceptance of the term is rare. It's just trite, usually juvenile and hyperventilating. And it backfires on our Democratic cause for those reasons, making it, bottom line, immoral.