Kash Patel Says No 'Credible' Info Epstein Trafficked Young Women to Others

[USS_Dauntless]

https://www.newsweek.com/kash-patel-jeffrey-epstein-files-update-release-vote-2130678

FBI Director Kash Patel told U.S. senators on Tuesday morning that there is "no credible information" in case files that Jeffrey Epstein trafficked young women to anyone other than himself.

The remarks came during a heated hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee, in which Republican Louisiana Senator John Kennedy asked Patel about his knowledge of the Epstein files.

https://www.newsweek.com/kash-patel-jeffrey-epstein-files-update-release-vote-2130678

[RubyRose]

1. Is he kidding? The checks must have cleared.

[Ocelot II]

2. Apart from the fact that he had been indicted and was about to stand trial for sex trafficking.

Looks like Trump's pet garden gnome is trying very, very hard to whitewash the Epstein files to be sure Dear Leader can't be associated with sex trafficking. If BFF Epstein didn't do it, then of course Trump can't have done it either.

What a lot of bullpucky.

[vapor2]

8. I feel the truth will eventually prevail

[EndlessWire]

28. Wasn't he convicted, and

got some sweetheart sentencing deal? I really thought he was convicted.

[Ocelot II]

30. He pled guilty in FL to 2 counts of engaging in prostitution with a minor.

The federal charges that were pending when he died in prison involved sex trafficking.

[EndlessWire]

32. TY.

Hard to keep up.

[Trueblue1968]

59. Patel. Is. A. Liar. Bring. Him. Up. On. Charges.

Patel needs to be locked up. Put his eyes out .

[returnee]

60. "Put his eyes out"?????

You might want to think about dialing that down a bit. Sounds like encouraging violence.

[RockRaven]

3. Someone should tell Patel about someone named Maxwell...

[underpants]

15. Yeah I mean, other than the convictions...

In 2021, she was found guilty of child sex trafficking and other offences in connection with the deceased financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.[

[BoRaGard]

4. Spoke like a true G.O.P. Pedo Protector

Is Patel on the List, too?

[fujiyamasan]

33. Isn't he a little young?

More importantly, I don’t think he was all that rich (well now I’m sure that’s changing, he’s in with the grifters).

From what I can tell, much of Epstein’s crowd was pretty wealthy (and white).

Patel is just deflecting, because he’s basically Trump’s loyal chihuahua.

[Skittles]

41. he is a Trump humper

he covers for perverts

[rubbersole]

43. He wasn't important enough or rich enough to be on their list.

[Torchlight]

5. The kid with cookie crumbs on his mouth points to the family dog.

Except in this case, mummy and daddy's faces are both pretty frosted too.

[rubbersole]

44. Hey, hey, hey ...there are standards here.

Don't bring family dogs into this sordid affair. 🤪

[vapor2]

6. Says the goon who said he would not have an enemies list at his nomination

[iemanja]

7. Shameless liar

and POS.

[The Roux Comes First]

9. I'd Love to Hear His Definition of "Credible"!

I suspect the correct "translation" would involve some combination of "I don't/can't read anything about that" and "those are my instructions."

[Clouds Passing]

35. It means it's credible because they destroyed all the credible evidence.

[lostincalifornia]

10. You already know the jackass is lying. How about prince Andrew, and why won't they

release the full reports.

I really hope the victims expose all.

[Vinca]

11. You know what that means, don't you? Trump was really, really, really, really involved.

[Ocelot II]

13. Yes, indeed.

He's trying to claim Trump's BFF for 15 years didn't do sex trafficking (despite the indictment and pending trial), so there's no stank to rub off on Trump.

That's pretty lame, Kash.

[regnaD kciN]

12. In other words...

…they found no credible way to redact the files so as to hide all Republican names while leaving in all Democratic ones.

[popsdenver]

46. More likely

is that the reason there are no files, is that all of them were confiscated by Trump, in order to do his biggest grift of all,
BLACKMAILING EVERY LAST PERSON ON THE LIST..........

No way he would miss an opportunity like that............

[Ping Tung]

14. Isn't he busy investigating "Radical Leftist" organizations like the ACLU, Planned Parenthood, and the PTA?

[rubbersole]

48. + PBS, NPR, NOAA, Sierra Club, ASCPA, Food Network...

[no_hypocrisy]

16. Just saying what has to be said to keep his job.

[everyonematters]

17. Why were so many people going to his island? Was it that much of a vacation resort, seriously?

[Jarqui]

18. Follow the cash, Kash

Where did Epstein get all his money and how/why?

It will probably lead you to a number of Trump's financial supporters ... which is why he won't pursue it.

[usonian]

19. Maybe this most extreme lie of all time will blow up the cover up.

[BattleRow]

40. I loved Burl Ives in that film,"Cat on a hot tin roof.".

Mendacity..sounds like a singing group .
.Maybe we could rename the Supremes at the High Court,"Mendacity."

[underpants]

20. Also Kash: the Utah killer had a manifesto, it was destroyed but we know there was one and what it said

Kash Patel: “Tyler Robinson was definitely a leftist. He had a manifesto that said so. It was destroyed so I can’t show it to you but I totally saw it!”
—-

Today’s New Narrative: Kash Patel now says Charlie Kirk assassin Tyler Robinson left behind manifesto that was destroyed but FBI can forensically prove its existence.

What?

Link to tweet

?s=46&t=3VBm1LJ8j8qLp6JTs_8J2A

Link to tweet

?s=46&t=3VBm1LJ8j8qLp6JTs_8J2A

[Midnight Writer]

22. The dog ate my manifesto.

[underpants]

37. (A bunch of kids) Really? Oh yeah, I TOTALLY saw it!!

[Midnight Writer]

23. If Epstein was not trafficking, why were there billions of dollars moving through his bank accounts?

[still-prayin4rain]

24. Absolutely ridiculous lie.

[Quiet Em]

25. So he's completely ignoring the victim's testimony or

he believes the victims are not credible.

What a jackass

[Johonny]

26. Did he speak to the fucking victims

Holy shit these people are alive and talking.

[BoRaGard]

27. Poisonous (r)

Just absolutely darkside poisonous...

[marble falls]

29. Desperately try to change TACO's mind about shit canning him. This actually brings more attention on TACO.

[EndlessWire]

31. Well, if there was any doubt

Kash opened his mouth and let the lies pour forth. Protecting his Fuerer while throwing away his own integrity.

[Ocelot II]

34. The federal indictment focuses on Epstein's abuse of his victims, but

it also alleges that Epstein "and others known and unknown, willfully and knowingly did combine, conspire, confederate, and agree together and with each other, to commit an offense against the United States, to wit, sex trafficking of minors..." https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/press-release/file/1180481/dl So where did that come from, Kash, you lying sack of shit? Others were involved. Who were they?

[aggiesal]

36. If that's true, that tells me, they distroyed a lot of evidence to protect Hair Leader. ...

Apparently, way back in the day when FBI raided his home in NYC, they pulled all kinds of documents & video from his safe.
Yet they never had any credible info about Epstein trafficked underage girls?
What happened to the manifest for his personal airplane to his private island?

[rubbersole]

49. Ask Bill Barr.

[Ponietz]

38. Credible is a weasel word

It only means what Kabash wants it to mean.

[twodogsbarking]

39. Aren't there a number of women who have come forward? What does "credible" mean in his head.

[muriel_volestrangler]

53. I suspect "credible" in his head means "said by a man" (nt)

[lastlib]

42. Hey, Ca$h, why don't you release the files.....

and let us decide for ourselves?

Just a thought......

So, how much Ca$h do you collect for making these sweeping judgments for your boss?

[tanyev]

45. Kash has never seen any evidence that Epstein trafficked young women.

[Mblaze]

47. I guess the testimony of the victims

Is not worthy of consideration.

[xuplate]

50. LIAR

[RANDYWILDMAN]

51. Chris Wray and Kash Patel can't both be Sargent Shultz

[URL=/gif/i-know-nothing-sgt-schultz-JLB7Et][IMG][/IMG][/URL]

Dude, you think i'd be hard to run the FBI, No these guys make it look easy

[MrWowWow]

52. Attn Survivors: It's Time to Publish Your List!

Shut this mofo know nothing stooge down. Publish your list!

[Quixote1818]

54. Then releasing everything shouldn't be an issue. nt

[Blue Owl]

55. How can a coked up cross-eyed crony be trusted?

[Wiz Imp]

56. So why did Trump's DOJ in 2019 indict him for Sex Trafficking?

https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/press-release/file/1180481/dl

COUNT ONE
(Sex Trafficking Conspiracy)

COUNT TWO
(Sex Trafficking)

From at least in or about 2002, up to and including in or about 2005, in the Southern District of New York, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, willfully and knowingly, in and affecting interstate and foreign commerce, did recruit, entice, harbor, transport, provide, and obtain by any means a person, knowing that the person had not attained the age of 18 years and would be caused to engage in a commercial sex act, and did aid and abet the same, to wit, EPSTEIN recruited, enticed, harbored, transported, provided, and obtained numerous individuals who were less than 18 years old, including but not limited to Minor Victim-1, as described above, and who were then caused to engage in at least one commercial sex act in
Manhattan, New York.
(Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1591(a)

https://www.newsweek.com/kash-patel-jeffrey-epstein-files-update-release-vote-2130678

Kennedy, alongside other senators, questioned Patel over the Epstein files on Tuesday morning. "You've seen most of the files. Who if anyone did Epstein traffic these young women to, besides himself?" Kennedy asked Patel. Patel responded, "Himself. There is no credible information, none. If there were I would bring the case yesterday that he trafficked to other individuals. And the information we have, again, is limited."

Blatant lie #1 (see info from indictment above)

FBI Director Kash Patel, on Tuesday: "I know there's a lot of talk about Epstein, and I'm here to testify that the original sin in the Epstein case was the way it was initially brought by Mr. Acosta back in 2006. The original case involved a very limited search warrant, or set of search warrants, and didn't take as much investigatory material as it should have seized. If I were FBI director back then, it wouldn't have happened."

Blatant lie #2

In July 2006, the FBI began its own investigation of Epstein, nicknamed "Operation Leap Year". It resulted in 53 page indictment in June 2007.

The Bush DOJ/Alex Acosta ultimately decided against pursuing the indictment and instead gave him the sweetheart deal. But I suspect it would be rather difficult to develop a 53-page indictment with "a very limited search warrant, or set of search warrants" and not "as much investigatory material as it should have seized". Considering the 2019 indictment was only 14 pages and referred only to the period 2002-2005, and thus was likely based at least in part on evidence collected during the 2006 investigation.

[spanone]

57. THE FIX IS IN.

GREATEST COVERUP IN PRESIDENTIAL HISTORY.

[KS Toronado]

58. Since Epstein was his only customer for under age girls

Why not release the files? He's dead he can't hurt you!