Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dalton99a

(95,207 posts)
Tue Sep 16, 2025, 04:09 PM Sep 2025

Bondi Prompts Broad Backlash After Saying She'll Target 'Hate Speech'

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/16/us/politics/pam-bondi-hate-speech-charlie-kirk.html

Bondi Prompts Broad Backlash After Saying She’ll Target ‘Hate Speech’
The attorney general also said she could investigate businesses that refused to print Charlie Kirk vigil posters as the Trump administration pushes to punish anyone who celebrated his killing.
By Glenn Thrush and Alan Feuer
Sept. 16, 2025, 3:07 p.m. ET

Attorney General Pam Bondi provoked a broad backlash this week after announcing she would “absolutely target” protesters engaging in “hate speech” — and claiming she had authority to investigate businesses that refused to print memorial vigil posters for the conservative activist Charlie Kirk.

The comments by Ms. Bondi on Monday appeared to reflect a broader effort by the Trump administration to punish anyone who has celebrated Mr. Kirk’s killing or even people who denounced his killing but continued to criticize his political stances.

Ms. Bondi’s assertion that the Justice Department might seek charges against a business for refusing to serve customers for political reasons could run afoul of a Supreme Court decision that barred state authorities from punishing a Colorado baker for refusing to bake a wedding cake for a same-sex couple.

When Jonathan Karl of ABC News asked Mr. Trump about Ms. Bondi’s hate speech comments, he went after Mr. Karl.

“We’ll probably go after people like you,” Mr. Trump said, “because you treat me so unfairly — it’s hate.”

...

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bondi Prompts Broad Backlash After Saying She'll Target 'Hate Speech' (Original Post) dalton99a Sep 2025 OP
Who gets to decide, Blondie? Jilly_in_VA Sep 2025 #1
How long before she says she's never even met the Don-old? jls4561 Sep 2025 #2
ALL of it? She's got an entire administration to investigate usonian Sep 2025 #3
Lock her up. moondust Sep 2025 #4
Criticizing the prez is now hate speech lame54 Sep 2025 #5
I don't see why the Right is so upset Vogon_Glory Sep 2025 #6
Shrill outraged noise from Spammy Pam! It's just how the troll rolls! struggle4progress Sep 2025 #7

Jilly_in_VA

(14,624 posts)
1. Who gets to decide, Blondie?
Tue Sep 16, 2025, 04:16 PM
Sep 2025

You? Some algorithm? The orange slime? KashYAP? Faux Noise? Because the tables are gonna turn one day. What goes around comes around.

usonian

(26,569 posts)
3. ALL of it? She's got an entire administration to investigate
Tue Sep 16, 2025, 04:33 PM
Sep 2025

and umpty-ump millions of screaming, hating crazies out there.

Most of FB and Twitter, and a few million "bots"

What "courage" to take them on.

Herself first.


What a complete, crapmatic ...


moondust

(21,349 posts)
4. Lock her up.
Tue Sep 16, 2025, 04:36 PM
Sep 2025
abuse or threatened abuse of law or legal process

(1) The term “abuse or threatened abuse of law or legal process” means the use or threatened use of a law or legal process, whether administrative, civil, or criminal, in any manner or for any purpose for which the law was not designed, in order to exert pressure on another person to cause that person to take some action or refrain from taking some action.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?width=840&height=800&iframe=true&def_id=18-USC-1108080733-986701302&term_occur=1&term_src=title:18:part:I:chapter 7:section:1589

Vogon_Glory

(10,348 posts)
6. I don't see why the Right is so upset
Tue Sep 16, 2025, 04:43 PM
Sep 2025

I doubt that Bondi would treat so-called “hate speech” equally. Considering the behavior of the current administration, anyone denouncing immigrants as rapists and murderers will get a free pass, as will anyone who thinks feminists and freethinkers are immoral degenerates who deserve public executions, while someone calling JD whose-doodle or what’s-his-name a poop-head is liable to be hit with a full-note SWAT-style arrest.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bondi Prompts Broad Backl...