Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

In It to Win It

(12,809 posts)
Mon Sep 22, 2025, 12:41 PM Sep 2025

Federal Judge Strikes Trump Defamation Lawsuit For Being Too Annoying to Read - Balls and Strikes

Balls and Strikes

On Friday, September 19, a federal district judge in Florida struck President Donald Trump’s complaint in his $15 billion defamation lawsuit against The New York Times, four Times reporters, and Penguin Random House, describing the complaint as “decidedly improper and impermissible.” Under Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a complaint is supposed to include “a short and plain statement” alleging enough facts that, if true, could warrant legal relief. The complaint Trump filed on Monday, by contrast, is 85 pages long and reads more like an anthology of his Truth Social posts, with slightly better punctuation.

Most complaints filed in federal courtrooms do not get tossed under Rule 8, but most complaints filed in federal courtrooms do not spend dozens of pages recounting, as Trump’s does, the plaintiff’s “singular brilliance” and “history-making media appearances” in programs like Fallen Champ: The Untold Story of Mike Tyson. Trump’s complaint is also crowded with boasts about his purported magnificence (for example, “President Trump secured the greatest personal and political achievement in American history”) and snipes about legacy media’s anti-Trump bias (for example, “Defendants baselessly hate President Trump in a deranged way”).

Friday’s order, in turn, is full of the judge’s unmasked exhaustion. “As every lawyer knows (or is presumed to know), a complaint is not a public forum for vituperation and invective,” wrote Steven Merryday, a judge appointed by President George H.W. Bush in 1992. “This complaint stands unmistakably and inexcusably athwart the requirements of Rule 8.” Merryday gave Trump 28 days to amend the complaint and come back with something less ridiculous, and not exceeding forty pages. “This action will begin, will continue, and will end in accord with the rules of procedure and in a professional and dignified manner,” he wrote.

This is probably not the warm reception Trump expected when he decided to file in the Tampa Division of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida—instead of, say, Washington, D.C., where he lives, or New York, where the Times is based. Trump’s complaint says that he chose to do so because Trump is a citizen of Florida, the defendants sell their published writing in Florida, and Floridians access and read their work.

Getting your defamation lawsuit struck under Rule 8 is roughly analogous to getting sent home early on the first day of school because you decided not to wear pants ballsandstrikes.org/law-politics...

Jay Willis (@jaywillis.net) 2025-09-19T21:42:03.843Z
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federal Judge Strikes Trump Defamation Lawsuit For Being Too Annoying to Read - Balls and Strikes (Original Post) In It to Win It Sep 2025 OP
So now he goes to whine and bitch to SCOTUS? durablend Sep 2025 #1
Maybe he thought that all Florida cases with his name on them would be filtered through Cannon. nt Buns_of_Fire Sep 2025 #2

Buns_of_Fire

(19,221 posts)
2. Maybe he thought that all Florida cases with his name on them would be filtered through Cannon. nt
Mon Sep 22, 2025, 01:29 PM
Sep 2025
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Federal Judge Strikes Tru...