Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFederal Judge Strikes Trump Defamation Lawsuit For Being Too Annoying to Read - Balls and Strikes
Balls and StrikesOn Friday, September 19, a federal district judge in Florida struck President Donald Trumps complaint in his $15 billion defamation lawsuit against The New York Times, four Times reporters, and Penguin Random House, describing the complaint as decidedly improper and impermissible. Under Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a complaint is supposed to include a short and plain statement alleging enough facts that, if true, could warrant legal relief. The complaint Trump filed on Monday, by contrast, is 85 pages long and reads more like an anthology of his Truth Social posts, with slightly better punctuation.
Most complaints filed in federal courtrooms do not get tossed under Rule 8, but most complaints filed in federal courtrooms do not spend dozens of pages recounting, as Trumps does, the plaintiffs singular brilliance and history-making media appearances in programs like Fallen Champ: The Untold Story of Mike Tyson. Trumps complaint is also crowded with boasts about his purported magnificence (for example, President Trump secured the greatest personal and political achievement in American history) and snipes about legacy medias anti-Trump bias (for example, Defendants baselessly hate President Trump in a deranged way).
Fridays order, in turn, is full of the judges unmasked exhaustion. As every lawyer knows (or is presumed to know), a complaint is not a public forum for vituperation and invective, wrote Steven Merryday, a judge appointed by President George H.W. Bush in 1992. This complaint stands unmistakably and inexcusably athwart the requirements of Rule 8. Merryday gave Trump 28 days to amend the complaint and come back with something less ridiculous, and not exceeding forty pages. This action will begin, will continue, and will end in accord with the rules of procedure and in a professional and dignified manner, he wrote.
This is probably not the warm reception Trump expected when he decided to file in the Tampa Division of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Floridainstead of, say, Washington, D.C., where he lives, or New York, where the Times is based. Trumps complaint says that he chose to do so because Trump is a citizen of Florida, the defendants sell their published writing in Florida, and Floridians access and read their work.
Most complaints filed in federal courtrooms do not get tossed under Rule 8, but most complaints filed in federal courtrooms do not spend dozens of pages recounting, as Trumps does, the plaintiffs singular brilliance and history-making media appearances in programs like Fallen Champ: The Untold Story of Mike Tyson. Trumps complaint is also crowded with boasts about his purported magnificence (for example, President Trump secured the greatest personal and political achievement in American history) and snipes about legacy medias anti-Trump bias (for example, Defendants baselessly hate President Trump in a deranged way).
Fridays order, in turn, is full of the judges unmasked exhaustion. As every lawyer knows (or is presumed to know), a complaint is not a public forum for vituperation and invective, wrote Steven Merryday, a judge appointed by President George H.W. Bush in 1992. This complaint stands unmistakably and inexcusably athwart the requirements of Rule 8. Merryday gave Trump 28 days to amend the complaint and come back with something less ridiculous, and not exceeding forty pages. This action will begin, will continue, and will end in accord with the rules of procedure and in a professional and dignified manner, he wrote.
This is probably not the warm reception Trump expected when he decided to file in the Tampa Division of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Floridainstead of, say, Washington, D.C., where he lives, or New York, where the Times is based. Trumps complaint says that he chose to do so because Trump is a citizen of Florida, the defendants sell their published writing in Florida, and Floridians access and read their work.
Getting your defamation lawsuit struck under Rule 8 is roughly analogous to getting sent home early on the first day of school because you decided not to wear pants ballsandstrikes.org/law-politics...
— Jay Willis (@jaywillis.net) 2025-09-19T21:42:03.843Z
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federal Judge Strikes Trump Defamation Lawsuit For Being Too Annoying to Read - Balls and Strikes (Original Post)
In It to Win It
Sep 2025
OP
Maybe he thought that all Florida cases with his name on them would be filtered through Cannon. nt
Buns_of_Fire
Sep 2025
#2
durablend
(9,363 posts)1. So now he goes to whine and bitch to SCOTUS?
"WAAAAAAAAA THE JUDGE WAS MEAN TO MEEEEEEEEEEEE"
Buns_of_Fire
(19,221 posts)2. Maybe he thought that all Florida cases with his name on them would be filtered through Cannon. nt