General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"They" killed Charlie Kirk?
No, "they" did not kill Charlie Kirk. But to listen to the speakers at the Kirk memorial, one would think that was the case.
It is sad that MAGA chooses to blame someone other than Tyler Robinson, the shooter, for the murder of Charlie Kirk. But, it shows that their heads and hearts are at the wrong place.
It shows that their lives are filled with too much hate. The American people should take note. We do not need these people in power, anywhere.
Steven Miller said that the "Democrat Party" killed Kirk. Someone might whisper to him that there is no such thing as the"Democrat Party". It is the Democratic Party.
And no, "they" did not kill Charlie Kirk.
some_of_us_are_sane
(2,893 posts)That's right, kentuck!
Klarkashton
(5,032 posts)Kirk broadcast 24/7. That's how it happened, everything else is bullshit.
Walleye
(44,039 posts)kimbutgar
(26,979 posts)She called on Saturday upset that blamed her being a Democrat. I dont see along term future in that marriage going forward. The guy barely interacts with me when I visit and I purposely never talk politics around him.
Be prepared for attacks by magaloons about this when we protest this illegal immoral administration.
regnaD kciN
(27,542 posts)Make a big deal about forgiving the guy who shot CK, while vowing no forgiveness and perpetual retaliation against millions upon millions of people who didnt.
SoFlaBro
(3,741 posts)womanofthehills
(10,749 posts)The FBI is investigating the possibility of accomplices
MrWowWow
(1,461 posts)Never Say Anything Bad About the Dead. He's dead. Good.
-Bette Davis
(Paraphrased)
.
Bayard
(28,990 posts)I got the same text from my brother--We killed Kirk because we couldn't stand him trying to get some college kids heads out of their asses. I had to look up who Kirk was.
A few days later, I texted him the bit about the shooter being a white rethuglican. Didn't hear anything back on that one.
gulliver
(13,803 posts)But our party needs to be much, much more clear about that. We need message control of our message. That means, in part, daring to tell violence-adjacent flakes who think they can co-opt our party (and the liberal philosophy) that they are not us. That they are at best our burden and at worst our enemy. They have no seat at our table.
maxsolomon
(38,393 posts)The Democratic Party somehow preemptively disavowing political violence is going to do fuck all to dissuade the James T. Hodgkinsons and Tyler Robinsons and Luigi Mangiones of the world.
Demsrule86
(71,518 posts)disassembling gun in a short time and then assembling gun again in woods-why?...sound like bullshit to me...his dad got a million buck for turning the kid in...one has to wonder. Did he really do it? I just don't see it happening the way they say it did.
maxsolomon
(38,393 posts)Where did you see that?
Demsrule86
(71,518 posts)I don't know what sources are credible...There was definitely a reward offered...that is the only thing certain.
maxsolomon
(38,393 posts)B.See
(8,014 posts)they: (them, pl) - those people. (when addressing) you people.
RedWhiteBlueIsRacist
(1,953 posts)Coroner's report: "The turd died fromMagacide."
thought crime
(1,358 posts)By pushing gun culture and by not accepting gun control. It was just one more gun death.
