This message was self-deleted by its author

[UTUSN]

This message was self-deleted by its author (UTUSN) on Tue Sep 23, 2025, 11:04 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.

[SickOfTheOnePct]

1. This really looks like AI...

...especially with the voice repeatedly talking about cancellation, when his show wasn't canceled.

[UTUSN]

2. It really looks like... anything posted is being called AI in the first post. How about a tutorial on spotting it,

I'll start with the due diligence with the YouTube (channel?) it came from (I only saw the KIMMEL on my miscellaneous YouTube feed), and let our DUer experts decide whether it's AI. But even if it is, its content isn't uncharacteristic or harmful of KIMMEL, yet I'll self-delete if it's AI. 203 videos, hmmm, lots of work, making a living? Otherwise, if only harmless threads could be allowed - free speech? - to sink like rocks on their own without help.

*********QUOTE*****

https://www.youtube.com/@Mickey.noticias/shorts
(logo of probably Copyrighted Mickey Mouse)

Mickey.noticias

Description
Contact us:[e-mail]
More info
www.youtube.com/@Mickey.noticias
United States
Joined Nov 12, 2024
37.6K subscribers
203 videos
31,504,891 views

*********UNQUOTE******

[SickOfTheOnePct]

3. I wouldn't call it a tutorial...

...but things I look for...

...not from a site that the subject would normally use to release content
...disembodied voiceover for most of the video
...incorrect information (in this case, cancellation mentioned repeatedly)
...quickly moving between clips and photos that don't really relate to the words being spoken
...cartoonish effects added like waterfalls from his eyes, flashing stars, etc.
...a quick Google search to see if any legit sources have published the video

[UTUSN]

4. I'll consider the harmless thread killed, not b/c of being proved whatever, just from being irked. Whole OP here.

And my reference to a "tutorial" was not sincere. But here's submitting to the tutorial that before launching the "AI" allegation a couple of considerations might be entertained:
1- Is there anything untrue or harmful in the item?
2- Can the artist of the item (separate from the purveyor of it) be taken as the artist's opinion, contributing a fresh angle not being seen elsewhere?
3- Does the "AI" allegation contribute anything positive, expose fraud, worth creating the irritation?

********Whole OP here:

A short from KIMMEL pre-return: "won't stop criticizing bad practices/cancelled ...silent protest ...flooded w/support"

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/7Osj82opQwc