General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTesla Tells Texas Court It Has No Duty to Warn Owners of Defects
A Tesla owner is suing the automaker over injuries sustained inappropriately fiery crash, but Tesla is denying responsibility. On December 9, 2023, Susmita Maddi was riding in a 2023 Tesla Model Y driven by her husband, Venkateswara Pasumarti. He had a medical emergency and crashed into a utility pole, causing the car to catch fire, according to court documents reviewed by Car Complaints.
Maddi suffered burns and other injuries after, the lawsuit alleges, becoming trapped in the Model Y due to defective door handles. The lawsuit claims the front-passenger door couldnt be opened from the outside by onlookers due to said defects, that these defects were present when the car was built, and that Tesla didnt provide adequate warning. Teslas defense rests on disputing that last point.
The lawsuit was filed in the Travis County District Court in Austin, Texas. Tesla told the judge that the case should be thrown out because the customer signed a binding arbitration agreement as part of the vehicle purchase, and because the crash occurred in Virginia, not Texas. But perhaps the boldest argument from Teslas lawyers rests on litigation in the Lone Star State.
Texas courts have specifically held there is no post-sale duty to warn of, or to recall, an allegedly defective product, Tesla lawyers said in court documents.
more.. https://www.autoblog.com/news/tesla-tells-texas-court-it-has-no-duty-to-warn-owners-of-defects
TommieMommy
(3,078 posts)Swede
(40,081 posts)nt
Baitball Blogger
(52,723 posts)TheBlackAdder
(29,981 posts)Future updates pending...
https://motor-junkie.com/death-traps-on-wheels-the-most-unsafe-cars-ever-built/74029/
BOSSHOG
(44,738 posts)A fan of Project 2025? No adherent to responsibility and integrity? Per chance a rugged individualist driven by freedom and independence?
Johonny
(26,613 posts)And his cars suck
sop
(19,318 posts)Duty to protect is a manufacturer's responsibility to design and market safe products, which may include implementing safety features in addition to or in lieu of warnings. Duty to warn focuses on informing users of risks, duty to protect encompasses the entire process of ensuring the product itself is safe.
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.