Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mr. Sparkle

(3,725 posts)
Sun Oct 5, 2025, 09:44 AM Oct 2025

Tesla Tells Texas Court It Has No Duty to Warn Owners of Defects

A Tesla owner is suing the automaker over injuries sustained inappropriately fiery crash, but Tesla is denying responsibility. On December 9, 2023, Susmita Maddi was riding in a 2023 Tesla Model Y driven by her husband, Venkateswara Pasumarti. He had a medical emergency and crashed into a utility pole, causing the car to catch fire, according to court documents reviewed by Car Complaints.

Maddi suffered burns and other injuries after, the lawsuit alleges, becoming trapped in the Model Y due to defective door handles. The lawsuit claims the front-passenger door couldn’t be opened from the outside by onlookers due to said defects, that these defects were present when the car was built, and that Tesla didn’t provide adequate warning. Tesla’s defense rests on disputing that last point.

The lawsuit was filed in the Travis County District Court in Austin, Texas. Tesla told the judge that the case should be thrown out because the customer signed a binding arbitration agreement as part of the vehicle purchase, and because the crash occurred in Virginia, not Texas. But perhaps the boldest argument from Tesla’s lawyers rests on litigation in the Lone Star State.

“Texas courts have specifically held there is no post-sale duty to warn of, or to recall, an allegedly defective product,” Tesla lawyers said in court documents.

more.. https://www.autoblog.com/news/tesla-tells-texas-court-it-has-no-duty-to-warn-owners-of-defects

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Tesla Tells Texas Court It Has No Duty to Warn Owners of Defects (Original Post) Mr. Sparkle Oct 2025 OP
OMG they should warn their customers. But rich people just don't care TommieMommy Oct 2025 #1
Quite the sales pitch. Swede Oct 2025 #2
Buy at your own risk, Baitball Blogger Oct 2025 #6
Their next models will be called Corvair & Pinto. Soon to be listed in 'Death Traps On Wheels.' TheBlackAdder Oct 2025 #7
Is the boss of Tesla anyhow connected to the Republican Party? BOSSHOG Oct 2025 #3
Musk is an awful person Johonny Oct 2025 #4
Manufacturers also have a duty to protect. sop Oct 2025 #5

BOSSHOG

(44,738 posts)
3. Is the boss of Tesla anyhow connected to the Republican Party?
Sun Oct 5, 2025, 09:59 AM
Oct 2025

A fan of Project 2025? No adherent to responsibility and integrity? Per chance a rugged individualist driven by freedom and independence?

sop

(19,318 posts)
5. Manufacturers also have a duty to protect.
Sun Oct 5, 2025, 10:10 AM
Oct 2025

Duty to protect is a manufacturer's responsibility to design and market safe products, which may include implementing safety features in addition to or in lieu of warnings. Duty to warn focuses on informing users of risks, duty to protect encompasses the entire process of ensuring the product itself is safe.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Tesla Tells Texas Court I...