Last edited Mon Oct 6, 2025, 02:51 PM - Edit history (1)
The convicted sex trafficker invoked Jeffrey Epstein’s infamous non-prosecution agreement that barred prosecuting his co-conspirators.
Supreme Court won’t review Ghislaine Maxwell’s appeal, which cited Epstein agreement www.msnbc.com/deadline-whi...
— Minka (@minkab.bsky.social) 2025-10-06T14:35:08.693Z
https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/ghislaine-maxwell-appeal-supreme-court-epstein-trump-rcna235391
The Supreme Court declined to review Ghislaine Maxwell’s appeal, in a rejection that could keep the sex trafficker locked up for another decade if President Donald Trump doesn’t grant her clemency.....
The federal Bureau of Prisons lists Maxwell’s release date as July 17, 2037. The 63-year-old was moved to a minimum-security facility after she had an unusual meeting this summer with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche (a former Trump personal lawyer), during which she said she never saw Trump do anything “inappropriate.” Her conviction followed Epstein’s 2019 death in custody while he was being held on his own related charges.
Monday’s denial comes amid political fallout from the Trump administration’s attempts to fend off intense backlash to its refusal to release all the information it has on the late disgraced financier.
The legal argument in Maxwell’s petition centered on Epstein’s notorious non-prosecution agreement in Florida that said, in part, that “the United States also agrees that it will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein.” She argued that the agreement should have applied to her New York case. The Trump Justice Department opposed high court review, arguing, among other things, that the agreement wasn’t intended to bind districts outside of Florida.
Maxwell had urged the justices to take her case not only to resolve her appeal but also to settle a split among the nation’s courts about how to interpret such agreements. The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers backed her appeal, asking the justices to grant review and “resolve the split among the circuits and ensure that defendants and their counsel can rely on the promises made by the United States in its written agreements.”
= new reply since forum marked as read
