So, word around the campfire

[Aviation Pro]

Is that DoJ is pushing for a gun registry. Not surprising given AG Stetson’s history.

Plenty of chatter on this on the intertubes.

[MarineCombatEngineer]

1. Probably a firearm registry for those that Been A Dick Donald's DoJ deems not

loyal enough to him, you know, Democrats, gays, black Americans, and so on and so forth.

[pdxflyboy]

2. My guess is that registration will only be required if.....you are a registered Democrat.

n/t.

[underpants]

3. ....or, as history shows, you're Jewish

Damn! I wasn’t supposed to post that.

[Hekate]

18. IOW, don't give DOJ ideas...

[louis-t]

4. It's all part of the plan to dismantle the Bill of Rights.

The Constitution is under attack and the 1st 10 amendments are being systematically removed. Speech? Only protected for maga. Press? You can only print what we tell you. Unreasonable search and seizure? We can break down your door and drag you into the street and there's nothing you can do about it. We'll steal your shit, too. Right to due process? We will disappear you to a foreign prison where you will be tortured. No warrant, no evidence, no attorneys, no trial needed.

[Silent Type]

5. So if he did officially propose a registry, would we support it seeing as it's something we've wanted for decades?

Obviously there are concerns with trump doing it vs. someone decent like Biden.

[MarineCombatEngineer]

6. Only if it were applied to everyone, but we know that won't happen,

it'll be enforced only against those considered an "enemy" of Been A Dick Donald and his criminal admin.

[Silent Type]

9. Doubt even trump would get away with that. Of course, registry ain't gonna happen. Personally, I doubt trump

is considering a registry.

The campfire "rumor" sounds a bit like podcasters desparately trying to gain an audience.

[MarineCombatEngineer]

11. Yeah, it's all inuendo, it would never pass the Congress

and MAGAt world would lose their collective minds.

[obamanut2012]

8. No, never

[Johonny]

16. I might support it

And the MAGA crowd would not.

It would also go straight to the courts and be found, likely, unconstitutional.

[Fiendish Thingy]

7. There's lots of chatter on the internet about the earth being flat too

Doesn’t mean it’s true.

The Trump administration will never propose, and the republican congress would never pass, a law requiring a national gun registry.

Maybe requiring all non-citizens to register their guns? I could see something along those lines, but even then, it’s a stretch.

[Emile]

10. Knowing this DOJ they probably will drug test

gun owners too. Tell that one to the gun humping magats.

[Greg_In_SF]

13. Drug test

143,000,000 people? How?

[Emile]

19. Shhhh, right-wingers will believe anything.

[progressoid]

12. It won't happen but it might wake a few nutters up to the other

actions that this administration is doing.

[IbogaProject]

14. Our initial gun registration law was from Germany

It was a translation of the law Hitler used. Registered the guns, disarmed the Jewish and the "leftists" before they got to rounding people up.

[Gaugamela]

15. Snopes says this is rumor:

At the time of this writing, Snopes found no evidence that Bondi or the DOJ were creating a registry of gun owners. Though a federal judge did order three gun owner organizations or associations to hand over verified member lists to government bodies, the same judge later vacated that judgment. It was unclear at the time of this writing what a revised judgment in Reese v. Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms & Explosives would entail.

The Oct. 7 judgment did not permit Bondi or the DOJ to create a gun owner registry and would have only released outdated member information from the three groups involved in the lawsuit. There was no evidence to suggest Bondi or the DOJ would have used that information to create a registry, as Dhillon wrote the DOJ had not asked for the information.
https://www.snopes.com/news/2025/10/16/bondi-gun-registry/

[Aviation Pro]

17. Thus campfire

Where bullshitin’ is an art form.