General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI think the way we choose Supreme Court justices is all wrong.
When I moved to Wisconsin a while back I was surprised to find out that Supreme Court justices are elected rather than appointed. There are seven justices and they serve 10 year terms.
Let's not pretend for a minute that appointing a judge or having them face Senate confirmation is non-partisan. Its extremely partisan. It doesn't take long to find out that potential justices lie their asses off. There is no penalty for lying, apparently.
Did Justice Roberts tell the Senate that he is deeply racist? That he doesn't believe racism exists? That he doesn't find dictatorship particularly offensive? He is a snake. A wolf in sheep's clothing.
This conservative majority is allowing Trump to destroy democracy.
If we get our country back this is the first thing we must fix. We don't need MORE justices. We need justices who believe in upholding Constitutional Law.
RainCaster
(13,888 posts)How can we do that?
rsdsharp
(12,093 posts)DetroitLegalBeagle
(2,527 posts)And has the same requirements, so its not likely to happen.
rsdsharp
(12,093 posts)Do you want to walk into a courtroom where your opponent heavily contributed to the judges election campaign, and you didnt (or contributed to his or her opponent)?
milestogo
(23,201 posts)and we need to make changes there too.
Don't judges in that situation have to recuse themselves?
rsdsharp
(12,093 posts)Silent Type
(12,412 posts)Judge elections might work, but no chance of that passing in my lifetime.
Jilly_in_VA
(14,624 posts)there should definitely be term limits. I would favor 15 years. Certainly no more. If that were the case, we'd long since have been rid of Clarence and Roberts. Not sure about Slimy Sammy because I don't remember who appointed him. And maybe the Chief Justice should be a rotating role of 5 years and they should draw lots.
milestogo
(23,201 posts)their retirement is going to disrupt the balance of the court.
I shudder when I think how long we are gonna be stuck with Beer Boy.
in2herbs
(4,531 posts)Divisions. Tech is advanced, arguments can be done over Zoom or the justices can travel to the SC.
Mysterian
(6,623 posts)not allow a duly appointed justice a vote in the Senate.
And stupid shit like requiring an elected congressperson to be "sworn in" by the Speaker. But the stupidest shit of all is the electoral college and the undemocratic apportionment of senators. The senators thing gives the bumpkin states, full of dirt not people, way too much power.
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.