General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSeems to be a battle brewing here. Gun owners v rationals.
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by REP (a host of the General Discussion forum).
Lets take it out to the parking lot.
OMFG! You shot me you bastard!
Floyd_Gondolli
(1,277 posts)jody
(26,624 posts)number of people who believe guns create crime who post often but nothing of substance.
Their counterparts don't last long.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)And those who contribute nothing to that rational debate have sure been flooding my Ignore List for the last week. About time to add Whovian, I guess...
Taverner
(55,476 posts)And I stand by that observation
geckosfeet
(9,644 posts)Some good discussion, but the bulk of it has been angry tirade.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)That's why I have trashed about 700 threads in GD in the past several days.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)And there's not even any point arguing about which side is worse about posting irrational, overheated twaddle. It doesn't matter.
TheMoreYouKnow
(63 posts)eliminating a person's right to self defense be seen as "rational"?
Taverner
(55,476 posts)You're pulling the NRA fear card like you thugs always do
"FEAR!!! TERROR!!!! KILL KILL KILL!!!!"
TheMoreYouKnow
(63 posts)Half of the anti-self defense people here are calling for all out bans on firearms and for the repealing of the 2nd amendment.
Thug? lol, hardly.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)No one is flat out saying we should get rid of all guns...that's just your brain on LaPierre.
We just want regulation, registration and reason
You want dead school children. Your extension, in your mind, is more valuable than children's lives. I got it.
TheMoreYouKnow
(63 posts)while trying to claim the high road and say that nobody is calling for all guns to be gone when it happens here every hour?
The lives of my wife and children are ALWAYS more valuable than the lives of anyone trying to cause them physical harm, do you get that or is that too hard for you to comprehend?
Taverner
(55,476 posts)You will never need it
Putting a light outside your door will do way more to deter intruders than your gun will
BTW - did you just join DU so you could yell at Democrats who value human life?
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)In my small town of about 2,500 people we have had murders. About four years ago a young couple's home was invaded and they were knifed to death. A few months after that, another young couple was clubbed to death in their own home.
My own wife has twice used her concealed handgun to prevent herself from being mugged. Since she, like me, is a senior citizen, she my well not have survived the mugging. When the would be mugger saw that she was armed he turned around and fled. The second incident was at the same place, same time of day, same story, but a different day.
Violent crime really does happen, and being armed really can give you the tool to not be a crime statistic.
geckosfeet
(9,644 posts)Get a grip.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)I own guns and I have no problem with registration and regulation. I don't understand why people run around with their hair on fire at the mere mention of it.
jal777
(59 posts)spin
(17,493 posts)One poster called all gun owners "terrorists" recently.
The recent fad of insulting gun owners is largely due to emotion over the tragic recent massacres in theaters and schools. Such emotion is entirely understandable.
But I've been posting here for several years and if I had a dollar for every time that I was insulted I could buy myself a brand new S&W revolver or a Glock. (I own a fair number of S&W revolvers but have never owned a Glock pistol as while they are very accurate and reliable they have a grip that doesn't fit my hand.)
To be a gun owner and post in favor of gun rights it's best to have a thick skin. I personally enjoy truly original insults but they are rare here. I don't trade insult for insult and do my best to be polite and use facts and statistics to support my views. Of course they are labeled as "NRA talking points" and are consequently ignored. The sad part is that facts are facts and statistics from the FBI or the Bureau of Justice Statistics are not funded by the NRA.
TheMoreYouKnow
(63 posts)nt
Floyd_Gondolli
(1,277 posts)Yeah, when people see 20 children murdered while the other side of the argument is as obtuse as ever they tend to get a tad upset.
TheMoreYouKnow
(63 posts)is met with nothing but childish insults and attacks. Our right to protect our homes and our families with a self defense firearm is protected by the US Constitution, not members of DU and their opinions. I don't own an "assault weapon" nor do I see the need to own one but that hasn't stopped some people here from labeling me as a child murderer simply because I choose to protect my family and home with a semi-automatic handgun.
OneMoreDemocrat
(913 posts)If the argument is as narrowly defined as "guns are bad", "no they're not" then that's not really going to get us anywhere.
Lanza's walking into that school and shooting 20 kids did not happen in a vacuum, there are a lot of other things that should be addressed than just guns.
The guns speak to the how, but not the why and if the why.
Unfortunately, it has become apparent that we are not allowed to talk about poor parenting, bad schools, video games, mental illness, anger, our violent society or anything else that may have led this shooter (and the others before him) to do this, so all we are left to yell at each other about is guns and neither side is going to win the argument which doesn't sit well with people who like to win arguments and have the last word on everything.
spin
(17,493 posts)Taverner
(55,476 posts)Seriously - I've shot guns before and it's really not that exciting.
Are you saying that is the ONLY reason you have a gun? To shoot paper targets?
And why do you need that many weapons? You only have two hands!
jal777
(59 posts)I have tried yoga I don't like it. I have tried tofo and it tastes like crap to me. You don't think guns are exciting, well thats your opinion and it wont change my mindset. My point is that we all have opinions. I shoot paper to practice my shooting. I shoot clay birds to practice my shotgun skills.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)I shoot guns at paper targets and nobody has ever called me a killer. I am for registration and regulation and I have owned guns my whole life.
I don't understand why some people have to act like chicken little at the mere thought of rational gun laws.
Whovian
(2,866 posts)It was expected.
CTyankee
(68,212 posts)The Delicate Flowers are in a terrible tizzy.
Whovian, you old meanie! Leave the poor dears alone...you've made them whimper...
Whovian
(2,866 posts)CTyankee
(68,212 posts)U.S. gun policy is insane.
11 Bravo
(24,310 posts)I have neither the time nor the inclination to attempt to explain to you something which you probably already know. But just for shits and giggles ... #1 there are long time DU progressives who owns guns; #2 there are newbies seeking instant righteous lefty cred who post stupid shit about the DUers mentioned in #1. (But it doesn't get really funny until the DUers mentioned in #2 pretend that they are under attack from the Duers mentioned in #1.)
If you are this desperately in need of validation, may I suggest a Rescue Lab?
Whovian
(2,866 posts)11 Bravo
(24,310 posts)Whovian
(2,866 posts)Anyone with a pulse could get a MOS in 70-71. Sorry you gat dragged into that unjust war.
11 Bravo
(24,310 posts)But some of us were tagged 11-B. And lots of guys without a pulse came home in a box wearing that same MOS. So I'll say it again, fuck off, clown.
obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)What an effing post.
obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)Thanks.
And, sorry you got snarked at about being in the military. I have vets from many wars in my family, as well as active and retired who were lucky enough to never be in combat.
obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)You are talking to a vet.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)But to have such a knee jerk reaction to the mere mention of some regulation gets you guys all hopped up on LaPierre...
11 Bravo
(24,310 posts)mandatory registration, and a variety of other gun control laws. But, you see, I actually own guns, so I must be on the other side of the "gun owners vs rational" argument. Now, I'm also "hopped up on LaPierre", a man for whom I have no respect whatsoever.
Fuck it, maybe the real gun nuts are right, and there's no room for discussion.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)Your openness and desire for unification is just boundless.
Paladin
(32,354 posts)obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)jody
(26,624 posts)fact the latest government report.
"Gun Control Legislation by CRS (Nov 14, 2012) reports
- from 1994 to 2007, firearm number [font color = ff0000 size = 4]increased[/font] from 192 million to 294 million.
- from 1994 to 2007, Firearms-Related Murder Rate [font color = ff0000 size = 4]decreased[/font] from 6.6 to 3.9.
FBI reports "Knives or cutting instruments" commit 13.3% of murders, "Hands, fists, feet, etc." 5.7% and Rifles and Shotguns 5.4%.
Why do those who believe guns create crime ignore "Knives or cutting instruments" and "Hands, fists, feet, etc." ?
11 Bravo
(24,310 posts)Somebody needs to buy these kids a puppy.
obamanut2012
(29,369 posts)And, this poster is quite persistent in doing this.
Rex
(65,616 posts)are the real problem. I DOUBT anyone here that is a member, believes the govt is going to take all ther guuuuns away from them.
AM I wrong?
Response to Whovian (Original post)
southernyankeebelle This message was self-deleted by its author.
jal777
(59 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)more than family or life itself. And they are so stupid, as to believe the FUD from the NRA. Like scared little sheep.
Response to jal777 (Reply #43)
southernyankeebelle This message was self-deleted by its author.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)It's rationality.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)We don't follow kooks like Wayne Pierre or the GOP talking points. We have no problem with gun registration and regulation. Please don't lump us with the RW chicken little "gun grabbers" crowd.
This violates the SoP of this Forum.