Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

gulliver

(13,985 posts)
Sat Oct 25, 2025, 12:56 PM Oct 2025

A "ballroom" isn't such a terrible idea, imo

It allows for better security for large White House gatherings for one thing. And it works for both warm and cold seasons. I asked AI, and the East Wing was basically just a bunch of office space including, the First Lady's offices, along with a classified emergency bunker.

Trump being Trump, we'll probably see political rallies and an IFC or WWE event or two. But there may be a few appropriate events mixed in.

The worst part is the private funding. That looks like a way for donors to influence Trump. Fortunately, we've already established that influence peddling is Ok. It's what the Founders would want.

33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A "ballroom" isn't such a terrible idea, imo (Original Post) gulliver Oct 2025 OP
Arlington Cemetery would make a nice Golf Course leftstreet Oct 2025 #1
I would not put it past the sick freak that is our President to defile Arlington dwayneb Oct 2025 #5
It's a distraction dwayneb Oct 2025 #2
Yeh, right. NoRethugFriends Oct 2025 #3
Check out Krugman's take. BootinUp Oct 2025 #4
Good article gulliver Oct 2025 #6
Quick, worthwhile read. Thanks. yonder Oct 2025 #12
Yes, tackiness and tyranny go hand in hand. ananda Oct 2025 #14
There already is a ballroom in the main White House. Ocelot II Oct 2025 #7
I didn't do the AI justice. gulliver Oct 2025 #8
LOL. Trump would not do that to the main White House residence building? Really? Seems I read some here claiming hlthe2b Oct 2025 #21
Trump does things to get reactions and suck up the oxygen, he doesn't use some kind of value BootinUp Oct 2025 #24
Yeah, demolition and erasure of everything tRump -- that'll be something good. Side benefit: a very good screwing of KPN Oct 2025 #27
Yes, it is a terrible idea. It is a symbol of Trump's dictatorship, his grifting, and will be corruptly funded. Doodley Oct 2025 #9
*THIS GUY* needs a $350 million ballroom? Blue Owl Oct 2025 #10
Let's name it the Epstein Ballroom until its demolition. Justice matters. Oct 2025 #17
Works for me! Blue Owl Oct 2025 #18
Sure, let's bulldoze everything that's not shiny and new. Who cares about things like history and tradition? sinkingfeeling Oct 2025 #11
I think I got Trump's basic motive down. ananda Oct 2025 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author UniqueUserName Oct 2025 #13
It's a money laundering operation. Tommy Carcetti Oct 2025 #16
Yup hlthe2b Oct 2025 #20
We do NOT need a gold-plated ballroom almost twice the size of existing WH residence! We do not need hlthe2b Oct 2025 #19
The worst part is treating the White House as if it were private property. OrwellwasRight Oct 2025 #22
Unrec yardwork Oct 2025 #23
it is FUCKING DISGUSTING Skittles Oct 2025 #25
Nonsense. It is a horrible idea. MineralMan Oct 2025 #26
It's capricious, disrespectful, ill-funded, probably a garish abomination once done gulliver Oct 2025 #32
I think the desecration snowybirdie Oct 2025 #28
What price comfort Keepthesoulalive Oct 2025 #29
He's turning the WH into a dues paying country club Diraven Oct 2025 #30
Jesus, Mary, and Joseph Prairie Gates Oct 2025 #31
It's a stupid idea NJCher Oct 2025 #33

dwayneb

(1,107 posts)
5. I would not put it past the sick freak that is our President to defile Arlington
Sat Oct 25, 2025, 01:00 PM
Oct 2025

He has essentially done that from day 1, he hates the suckers and losers that fought and died to keep dictators like him from destroying our Constitution.

dwayneb

(1,107 posts)
2. It's a distraction
Sat Oct 25, 2025, 12:59 PM
Oct 2025

Away from things that matter a lot more - like starting a war with our South American neighbors.

ananda

(35,140 posts)
14. Yes, tackiness and tyranny go hand in hand.
Sat Oct 25, 2025, 01:46 PM
Oct 2025

It's a rich white trash dictatorship run by
fools with poor minds and plastic faces.

And we're all stuck in this ship of fools
already leaking water as it sinks.

Ocelot II

(130,516 posts)
7. There already is a ballroom in the main White House.
Sat Oct 25, 2025, 01:05 PM
Oct 2025

It's called the East Room. It's quite elegant, originally designed by James Hoban and George Washington to be a "Public Audience Room." It's been used for a variety of large gatherings ever since. It just isn't big enough to accommodate the number of oligarchs Trump intends to entertain for the solicitation of bribes.



And don't ask AI about shit. The East Wing was a lot more than just a bunch of offices.

gulliver

(13,985 posts)
8. I didn't do the AI justice.
Sat Oct 25, 2025, 01:13 PM
Oct 2025

It also mentioned the bit about the East Wing being used as basically a large gathering place for public tours and so forth.

I'm also bothered by the loss of history. If it were the main White House, well, Trump wouldn't have done it. Even Trump.

When we get back to the White House, I'm sure we'll find a way to use the space for some good.

hlthe2b

(113,947 posts)
21. LOL. Trump would not do that to the main White House residence building? Really? Seems I read some here claiming
Sat Oct 25, 2025, 02:46 PM
Oct 2025

when he first started talking about a ballroom, that he'd never just DO it--that he'd have to go to Congress--and then when he took the wrecking ball to the East Wing? Well, he'll surely stop there, right?

When are we going to learn that we cannot put ANYTHING past Trump. ANYTHING. And that includes taking us to war, btw.

BootinUp

(51,314 posts)
24. Trump does things to get reactions and suck up the oxygen, he doesn't use some kind of value
Sat Oct 25, 2025, 03:01 PM
Oct 2025

judgement, so "even trump" predictions are worthless.

KPN

(17,376 posts)
27. Yeah, demolition and erasure of everything tRump -- that'll be something good. Side benefit: a very good screwing of
Sat Oct 25, 2025, 03:32 PM
Oct 2025

the oligarchs who are donating money for the Epstein Ballroom, whether to kiss his ass or buy off our government. A good fucking to and for them all!

Doodley

(11,911 posts)
9. Yes, it is a terrible idea. It is a symbol of Trump's dictatorship, his grifting, and will be corruptly funded.
Sat Oct 25, 2025, 01:17 PM
Oct 2025

Never have I heard any president or other lawmakers say they need a 90.000 square foot ballroom. It isn't Trump's White House to sell for influence and grandeur.

Justice matters.

(9,786 posts)
17. Let's name it the Epstein Ballroom until its demolition.
Sat Oct 25, 2025, 01:55 PM
Oct 2025

After it's demolished, let's put a tombstone on the lawn over with a plaque showing in all caps

EPSTEIN BALLROOM
2025 - (date of death)
NEVER FORGET

sinkingfeeling

(57,832 posts)
11. Sure, let's bulldoze everything that's not shiny and new. Who cares about things like history and tradition?
Sat Oct 25, 2025, 01:34 PM
Oct 2025

ananda

(35,140 posts)
15. I think I got Trump's basic motive down.
Sat Oct 25, 2025, 01:50 PM
Oct 2025

He is mentally and psychologically unable to
do anything balletter than anybody else; and
since he feels one-upped by our entire history
of leaders and their products, he wants to
destroy all their products, monuments, and
history and recreate his own, no matter what
it looks like.

It's the era of replacement, even with cheap,
gaudy, tacky, and of course bloody artifacts.

Response to gulliver (Original post)

hlthe2b

(113,947 posts)
19. We do NOT need a gold-plated ballroom almost twice the size of existing WH residence! We do not need
Sat Oct 25, 2025, 02:42 PM
Oct 2025

an ego-boosting project that allows Trump to disregard OUR HOUSE for a setting he hopes to rival Versailles or the Russian monarchical monstrosities of history for the sole purpose of grifting/extorting from the oligarchy--like Putin. When we ignore the legalities of what he is doing, we only reward him and encourage further obscenities.

Further, we do not need to allow Trump to decimate our history, and if you think he's going to prioritize offices for the First Lady, I've got news for you. No First Lady (including the current makes on bit of damned difference to him--nor does he consider them worthy of acknowledgement for any contributions).

But, I return to the obscene monstrosity Trump intends to build (and which our refusal to require him to follow rules or laws or even precedents to ensure historical and architectural appropriateness and scale). Is this REALLY what you want to see? It is so out of proportion that it totally cheapens the original building. I am appalled.


OrwellwasRight

(5,312 posts)
22. The worst part is treating the White House as if it were private property.
Sat Oct 25, 2025, 02:57 PM
Oct 2025

Last edited Mon Nov 10, 2025, 05:19 AM - Edit history (1)

It’s not. It’s public property. And historical to boot. It’s not Mar-a-Lago. He doesn’t have any rights to make any structural changes.

It is one more example of turning up the heat on the boiling frog. One more thing for us to say “it’s no big deal, I can live with this.”

MineralMan

(151,259 posts)
26. Nonsense. It is a horrible idea.
Sat Oct 25, 2025, 03:22 PM
Oct 2025

That you don't recognize that indicates that you are not really thinking about it. We need to think, not react.

gulliver

(13,985 posts)
32. It's capricious, disrespectful, ill-funded, probably a garish abomination once done
Sat Oct 25, 2025, 04:02 PM
Oct 2025

On the other hand, it's a building. And it's not the West Wing. Only so much land in a key place can be dedicated to museum-like uses. I have exactly the same feelings about it as others do. I would rather it hadn't happened. But there is a bright side.

Will it be a "ballroom?" Or is it going to become more multi-purpose, allowing very large gatherings that can happen in any season and in any weather conditions? Will inaugurations and other key ceremonies and gatherings be done there under better security? Is it in fact going to be more secure as an emergency shelter? Are we going to enjoy completely changing it in 2028?

snowybirdie

(6,684 posts)
28. I think the desecration
Sat Oct 25, 2025, 03:32 PM
Oct 2025

of a symbol of government at least needed review, transparency and all branches agreement before it was torn down. Teddy Roosevelt built it. Just a bunch of offices were where history was made is more important than a man's ego.

Keepthesoulalive

(2,301 posts)
29. What price comfort
Sat Oct 25, 2025, 03:33 PM
Oct 2025

There is no justification for this destruction. What has he ever done that has made the nation better. That disgusting ballroom is just another gut punch.

Diraven

(1,896 posts)
30. He's turning the WH into a dues paying country club
Sat Oct 25, 2025, 03:52 PM
Oct 2025

Except instead of membership fees there will just be bribes. The ballroom enables him to hugely increase the volume of the bribery to literally hundreds of people at a time for every event they hold there.

NJCher

(43,161 posts)
33. It's a stupid idea
Sat Oct 25, 2025, 04:18 PM
Oct 2025

Imagine the cost of heating this thing, year after year. Maintenance. He would be sticking us with huge overhead for a building that doesn't merit building.

I want my representatives working on my behalf, like they are being paid to do. NOT wining and dining thousands of people on my tax dime.

I truly hope this hideous project is stopped.

Public outrage, if nothing else.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A "ballroom" isn't such a...