Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsChatGPT came up with a 'Game of Thrones' sequel idea. Now, a judge is letting George RR Martin sue for copyright
infringement.When a federal judge decided to allow a sprawling class-action lawsuit against OpenAI to move forward, he read some "Game of Thrones" fan fiction.
In a court ruling Monday, US District Judge Sidney Stein said a ChatGPT-generated idea for a book in the still-unfinished "A Song of Ice and Fire" series by George R.R. Martin could have violated the author's copyright.
"A reasonable jury could find that the allegedly infringing outputs are substantially similar to plaintiffs' works," the judge said in the 18-page Manhattan federal court ruling.
The decision was made in a case that consolidated several class-action lawsuits from authors including Martin, Michael Chabon, Ta-Nehisi Coates, Jia Tolentino, and Sarah Silverman, among others against OpenAI and Microsoft.
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/tv/articles/chatgpt-came-game-thrones-sequel-190717101.html
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
ChatGPT came up with a 'Game of Thrones' sequel idea. Now, a judge is letting George RR Martin sue for copyright (Original Post)
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
Oct 2025
OP
WSHazel
(757 posts)1. It is plagiarism
ChatGPT is stealing intellectual property. This should be an easy win for the authors, and we are in a lot of trouble if it isnt.
SheltieLover
(80,441 posts)2. Absolutely!
in2herbs
(4,388 posts)3. A while back I read that the British court issued copyright laws saying that AI would be
required to get approval from the creator, otherwise it would be in violation of copyright law.
Response to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)
PeaceWave This message was self-deleted by its author.