Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTucker Carlson didn't push back as Nick Fuentes criticized "the power of organized Jewry" in America:
Total Groyper Victory
TUCKER CARLSON INTERVIEWED white nationalist podcaster Nick Fuentes on Monday, sitting politely as Fuentes criticized the power of organized Jewry in America. The right-wing internet has been in turmoil ever since.
Suddenly, nothingincluding the racism, Holocaust denialism, and antisemitism Fuentes has championedseems to be too hot for MAGA media to embrace.
That amounts to a catastrophe for more traditional conservative media figures. Breitbarts Joel Pollak declared that the claims Fuentes made that Carlson left unchallenged amounted to the foundation of Nazism. The Daily Wires Andrew Klavan said that Carlsons embrace of Fuentes would doom the right. Writer Rod Dreher wrote that Jewish friends had told him Fuentes is the most dangerous man in America to Jews.
None of those critics has a sliver of the audience and momentum that Fuentes enjoysboth of which will no doubt continue to grow now that Carlson has welcomed him as a reasonable figure worthy of his even larger platform. (Fuentes has 1 million followers on X; Carlson has 16.7 million.) And thats precisely why anyone in the Republican party with a shred of principle left is sounding the alarm. Because, at the most fundamental level, Carlson has just accelerated the rights already prominent tilt toward authoritarianism and hate.
TUCKER CARLSON INTERVIEWED white nationalist podcaster Nick Fuentes on Monday, sitting politely as Fuentes criticized the power of organized Jewry in America. The right-wing internet has been in turmoil ever since.
Suddenly, nothingincluding the racism, Holocaust denialism, and antisemitism Fuentes has championedseems to be too hot for MAGA media to embrace.
That amounts to a catastrophe for more traditional conservative media figures. Breitbarts Joel Pollak declared that the claims Fuentes made that Carlson left unchallenged amounted to the foundation of Nazism. The Daily Wires Andrew Klavan said that Carlsons embrace of Fuentes would doom the right. Writer Rod Dreher wrote that Jewish friends had told him Fuentes is the most dangerous man in America to Jews.
None of those critics has a sliver of the audience and momentum that Fuentes enjoysboth of which will no doubt continue to grow now that Carlson has welcomed him as a reasonable figure worthy of his even larger platform. (Fuentes has 1 million followers on X; Carlson has 16.7 million.) And thats precisely why anyone in the Republican party with a shred of principle left is sounding the alarm. Because, at the most fundamental level, Carlson has just accelerated the rights already prominent tilt toward authoritarianism and hate.
https://www.thebulwark.com/p/one-of-the-most-dangerous-interviews-ever-maga-media-tucker-carlson-nick-fuentes
16 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Tucker Carlson didn't push back as Nick Fuentes criticized "the power of organized Jewry" in America: (Original Post)
tblue37
Oct 2025
OP
Fuentes is an open nazi, any use of Jewish/Jews/Jewry by the POS is going to be pure hate.
Celerity
Oct 2025
#10
Celerity
(54,404 posts)1. Link.
tblue37
(68,436 posts)2. I added it. Thanks.
Skittles
(171,704 posts)3. Jewry?
over 16 million people follow Tucker Fucking Carlson? A million follow Nick Fucking Fuentes?
tblue37
(68,436 posts)4. That's how Nazi wannabes talk.
Skittles
(171,704 posts)6. the thing is
I did not even have to look that up to know it as fact
Celerity
(54,404 posts)8. No, it's a common term often used by Jews themselves.

Skittles
(171,704 posts)9. yes but when THOSE people (bigots) use it
it's something ENTIRELY DIFFERENT
Celerity
(54,404 posts)10. Fuentes is an open nazi, any use of Jewish/Jews/Jewry by the POS is going to be pure hate.
hlthe2b
(113,947 posts)5. Only surprised that anyone would be surprised at Tucker...
If you are asking about the term:
JEWRY Definition & Meaning
Merriam-Webster
https://www.merriam-webster.com dictionary Jewry
noun Jew· ry ˈjü-rē ˈju̇r-ē 1. The Jewish people 2. Plural Jewries : a community of Jews Examples of Jewry in a Sentence
Or just saying you don't like the term, I get it. I don't either. But it is an accepted word.
JustAnotherGen
(38,050 posts)12. So is the n-word
And for now . . . that's not socially acceptable either. But I understand your point.
hlthe2b
(113,947 posts)13. I simply answeed a question
I dont deserve that implied association
JustAnotherGen
(38,050 posts)14. I didn't imply anything
I just shared the fact . . . that the most natural ally of Black Americans are Americans who are Jewish. Shared experience. Both names are in the dictionary - but if Tuckums had used 'n-wordery' instead of Jewery - it would catch heat.
hlthe2b
(113,947 posts)16. Had you bothered to read my actual comment, I stated my disdain for the word and I am quite aware of the history
I did nothing but respond to what I took to be a question from someone unaware of the word, while likewise giving benefit of the doubt that they were, instead, showing their displeasure with the use of the word as I had.
Celerity
(54,404 posts)7. Jewry is common term often used by Jews themselves

JustAnotherGen
(38,050 posts)11. Ironically - JHFC
617Blue
(2,471 posts)15. Calling Bill Ackman...Bill?.....