General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis message was self-deleted by its author
This message was self-deleted by its author (PeaceWave) on Thu Nov 6, 2025, 10:31 AM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.
Gore1FL
(22,951 posts)I would prefer having podcasts at that level than Fox News, OAN, NewsMax, etc.
I think you my be over-generalizing based on the medium and not the content.
Silent Type
(12,412 posts)in the podcasters. And podcasters seem to have no problem stretching/distorting truth for viewers.
LuvLoogie
(8,814 posts)And a Substack
Now ask me what the fuck is Substack.
https://substack.com/@jimacosta
Blue_Adept
(6,499 posts)EdmondDantes_
(1,794 posts)The BBC Global News comes from their news division. Perfectly reasonable source.
There's always been a push towards hyperbole to get attention. Rachel Maddow does it frequently. Not my thing, so I stopped listening. Sci Fri puts their show out as a podcast. The New Yorker puts out a political podcast.
Jacson6
(2,013 posts)hlthe2b
(113,947 posts)-while others... are clearly NOT.
One has to be discriminating in terms of the author/podcaster, their credibility, their guests (if any), and the content. But there are tons available that will meet my prior criteria. I listen to them frequently while walking or commuting. Not just politically-based, as I like history and other topics as well.
That said, if you have a short attention span and get bored quickly (as I do), you can change the speed of the content or skip ahead--something important to do for those with interminable ads.
Wednesdays
(22,593 posts)Some are great, some are horrendous.
You just need to find the ones that are good and speak for you.
BigmanPigman
(55,137 posts)MSM whitewashes everything. They suck! Podcasts give more info, answers real questions and are not the lap dogs of corporate bosses.
