General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAnyone checked Healthcare.gov today?
Looks like the subsidy cliff is back. I checked plans for two parents in their 60's and one college-age dependent child. Subsidies were pretty large (about $2 840 in my location) up to an income of about $106,000. At $107,000, the subsidy was gone...$0.
I realize that this is above what most people out there make, but that cliff is really severe. And, given that I still haven't heard anything on actually having subsidies for the upcoming year, I'm concerned that a lot of people who file early are going to be sorely disappointed down the line.
>$2800 a month for a bronze plan with a high deductible is a bit excessive, don't you think?
leftstreet
(40,666 posts)That's just ridiculous
The Madcap
(1,903 posts)I don't understand why there would be any subsidies at all, given the present political situation, unless they're just trying to prevent a major rebellion among the "poors."
markodochartaigh
(5,545 posts)a month for a bronze plan with a high deductible is a bit excessive, don't you think?"
Do you mean a $2,800 subsidy is too much, or a $2,800 payment is too much? Or are the subsidy and payment both $2,800?
I think that a $2,800 payment ($33,600/year) for a couple with one child making $106,000/year (32% of income) is too much to ask people to pay. Especially in a system where ~20% of all money coming into the system goes to insurance companies who (using who instead of which since companies are people /$) make their money by denying and rationing care. And especially in a system where "health care" organizations like hospitals often take another 20% off the top for administrative expenses.
Of course our system is not a health care system. We have a profit making system which produces as much profit as possible while producing as little health care as possible as a byproduct.
The Madcap
(1,903 posts)The subsidy was close to the same below 106k.