The adjudicated rapist & convicted Felon in the W.H. approaches SUSAN COLLINS LEVELS of "concern" over the shutdown

[Miles Archer]

The filibuster has existed in various forms since the 1780s and was adopted as an official rule in 1917, according to the U.S. Senate.

Trump, however, has been trying to convince his party members that Democrats will eventually kill the filibuster if Republicans don’t.

“REMEMBER, THE DEMOCRATS WILL DO IT IMMEDIATELY, AS SOON AS THEY GET THE CHANCE. OUR DOING IT WILL NOT GIVE THEM THE CHANCE. REPUBLICANS, BE TOUGH AND SMART! THE DEMS ARE CRAZED LUNATICS, THEY WILL NOT OPEN UP OUR COUNTRY NO MATTER HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE IRREPARABLY HARMED!” he wrote.

The White House also shared the Truth Social post on X lest any members of the president’s caucus miss it on his other platform.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/raging-donald-trump-sends-all-caps-demand-to-republicans-in-unhinged-power-grab-rant/

[lapfog_1]

1. That is poorly written

BUT was not written by Trump... Irreparably Harmed? He could not spell that correctly no matter how hard he tried.

[usonian]

3. He's a chatbot. No think, only 🏌️+ $$$

He's a chatbot. Probably programmed by ChatGOP.

And Miller's pulling the levers on his rotted corpse.


https://www.techdirt.com/2025/04/29/the-hallucinating-chatgpt-presidency/

Judge for yourself.

Tue, Apr 29th 2025 09:34am - Mike Masnick

We generally understand how LLM hallucinations work. An AI model tries to generate what seems like a plausible response to whatever you ask it, drawing on its training data to construct something that sounds right. The actual truth of the response is, at best, a secondary consideration.

snip

But over the last few months, it has occurred to me that, for all the hype about generative AI systems “hallucinating,” we pay much less attention to the fact that the current President does the same thing, nearly every day. The more you look at the way Donald Trump spews utter nonsense answers to questions, the more you begin to recognize a clear pattern — he answers questions in a manner quite similar to early versions of ChatGPT. The facts don’t matter, the language choices are a mess, but they are all designed to present a plausible-sounding answer to the question, based on no actual knowledge, nor any concern for whether or not the underlying facts are accurate.

snip

This is not the response of someone working from actual knowledge or policy understanding. Instead, it’s precisely how an LLM operates: taking a prompt (the question about job losses) and generating text based on some core parameters (the “system prompt” that requires deflecting blame and asserting greatness).

The hallmarks of AI generation are all here:
• Confident assertions without factual backing
• Meandering diversions that maintain loose semantic connection to the topic
• Pattern-matching to previous responses (“ripped off,” “billions of dollars”)
• Optimization for what sounds good rather than what’s true

[Norrrm]

4. Both parties have had the opportunity to get rid of it but they both have refused because they feel that it could be us

This filibuster crap is just that, repetitive whining. Both parties have had the opportunity to get rid of it but they both have refused because they feel that it could be useful in the future.

[spanone]

5. Dear felon, you have the house, the senate, the presidency & supreme court...

...and you're blaming the dems?

FUCK RIGHT OFF....