Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

diabeticman

(3,121 posts)
Wed Dec 26, 2012, 11:26 PM Dec 2012

Why is it no one is getting outrage about Wayne La Pierre suggested a mental health database

This was my wife question. She has heard people complain and argue about why IT ISN"T FAIR for gun owners to be placed on a database BUT having a mental illness database gets a shrug of the shoulders by certain people.

Don't they realize the idea of mental illness can range to your "standard definition" of general publics belief mental illness is BUT it can also extend to someone have a terrible time getting over perhaps grief after a love one passes on. In some areas that is now classified as mental illness.

40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why is it no one is getting outrage about Wayne La Pierre suggested a mental health database (Original Post) diabeticman Dec 2012 OP
Apparently you missed Saturday, Sunday, and Monday HereSince1628 Dec 2012 #1
She overheard some right wingers talking and it has been eating at her so she finally voiced her diabeticman Dec 2012 #5
I read the post as generalized past DU. salin Dec 2012 #10
You mean in the media? There's been plenty of outrage here Recursion Dec 2012 #2
My wife overhead some wingers talking about it and it has been upsetting her. diabeticman Dec 2012 #4
Your wife sure has a lot of questions. WorseBeforeBetter Dec 2012 #3
She says she's not interested in DU. I just happen to voice her questions or thoughts when diabeticman Dec 2012 #6
I hate to make the comparison but that is extremely Hitler esque. Initech Dec 2012 #7
huh? Wayne La Pierre started it when he mentioned this little idea in his "presser" diabeticman Dec 2012 #11
Hitler kept a database of Jewish people in Germany and that aided him in carrying out the holocaust. Initech Dec 2012 #17
NO MY WIFE AND I WONDERD WHY PEOPLE DIDN"T GET MORE PISSED OFF AT WAYNE"S diabeticman Dec 2012 #21
Whoa calm down here... I didn't mean that to offend. Initech Dec 2012 #24
I think that you totally missed the poster's meaning. yardwork Dec 2012 #26
I took that part out. Initech Dec 2012 #32
It also extends to substance abuse loyalsister Dec 2012 #8
true, I wonder if La Pierre really thought about that sentence he spoke would he realize that diabeticman Dec 2012 #9
If he is suggesting pipoman Dec 2012 #12
It is so messed up sandyshoes17 Dec 2012 #13
Yes, it's happening bongbong Dec 2012 #37
FYI, current laws concerning firearms and the mentally ill... PoliticAverse Dec 2012 #14
If he's the first name on it then maybe it might be worthwhile. n/t Cleita Dec 2012 #15
Because it's never going to happen customerserviceguy Dec 2012 #16
"folks who don't have their heads screwed on straight" Comatose Sphagetti Dec 2012 #18
Pick your favorite euphemism customerserviceguy Dec 2012 #22
5 myths about mass shootings.... Myth#1. The shooter is insane riderinthestorm Dec 2012 #28
What about HIPPA laws? etherealtruth Dec 2012 #40
Mayor Thomas M. Menino of Boston and Mayor Michael Bloomberg of New York City, cochairmen of Mayors jody Dec 2012 #19
his name would be first on the list KT2000 Dec 2012 #20
I am guessing because majority of the people might think its not a bad idea. idwiyo Dec 2012 #23
I was disturbed by that. Not "mentally disturbed," though (just in case someone's going to Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #25
I heard it here on DU over and over. Yes. Here. Many DAYS before Mr. LaPierre brought it up riderinthestorm Dec 2012 #27
Because it was so laughable. budkin Dec 2012 #29
because it is the rantings of a rightwing hack Skittles Dec 2012 #30
There are already mechanisms for placing those who should be prohibited from possessing... aikoaiko Dec 2012 #31
Tempest in a teapot. There already is a database for that purpose. slackmaster Dec 2012 #33
I am outraged LWolf Dec 2012 #34
Because people are generally clueless about mental illness Posteritatis Dec 2012 #35
This, the definition of Ableism, is extremely revealing. Fire Walk With Me Dec 2012 #36
i am. but it's just more of the same, imo. imo, the original sin is the creation of the category HiPointDem Dec 2012 #38
Outrage overload I would guess... OneMoreDemocrat Dec 2012 #39

diabeticman

(3,121 posts)
5. She overheard some right wingers talking and it has been eating at her so she finally voiced her
Wed Dec 26, 2012, 11:35 PM
Dec 2012

feelings to me.

salin

(48,955 posts)
10. I read the post as generalized past DU.
Wed Dec 26, 2012, 11:42 PM
Dec 2012

Per the 'water cooler' type work discussions. Perhaps it was a critique of DU (in which case I agree with you), but I read it as a media/societal commentary

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
2. You mean in the media? There's been plenty of outrage here
Wed Dec 26, 2012, 11:30 PM
Dec 2012

I think the larger public is better at not feeding trolls than DU is.

diabeticman

(3,121 posts)
6. She says she's not interested in DU. I just happen to voice her questions or thoughts when
Wed Dec 26, 2012, 11:37 PM
Dec 2012

it gets me thinking.

Initech

(100,105 posts)
17. Hitler kept a database of Jewish people in Germany and that aided him in carrying out the holocaust.
Thu Dec 27, 2012, 12:31 AM
Dec 2012

Last edited Thu Dec 27, 2012, 04:40 PM - Edit history (1)

diabeticman

(3,121 posts)
21. NO MY WIFE AND I WONDERD WHY PEOPLE DIDN"T GET MORE PISSED OFF AT WAYNE"S
Thu Dec 27, 2012, 07:45 AM
Dec 2012

SUGGESTION!!!


WHY A FEW WINGERS IN OUR AREA WOULD START USING THAT TALKING POINT!

Initech

(100,105 posts)
24. Whoa calm down here... I didn't mean that to offend.
Thu Dec 27, 2012, 03:25 PM
Dec 2012

I was just stating a fact - that's what I find so creepy about this thing. And I wonder why more people aren't making that connection.

yardwork

(61,712 posts)
26. I think that you totally missed the poster's meaning.
Thu Dec 27, 2012, 03:29 PM
Dec 2012

You might want to consider self-deleting. The poster is not defending LaPierre or the NRA.

diabeticman

(3,121 posts)
9. true, I wonder if La Pierre really thought about that sentence he spoke would he realize that
Wed Dec 26, 2012, 11:42 PM
Dec 2012

gun ownership would be so low that HE would be out of a job?

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
12. If he is suggesting
Wed Dec 26, 2012, 11:46 PM
Dec 2012

anything beyond placing people who have been involuntarily committed into NICS along with people with restraining orders and felons, he is an idiot.

sandyshoes17

(657 posts)
13. It is so messed up
Wed Dec 26, 2012, 11:47 PM
Dec 2012

My sister and her family are all right wingers. So they follow the talking points. I couldn't wait till this came up. Her kids are both on meds. One anti anxiety and the other ADHD. I told her would they have to be in the data base, would anyone who was prescribed something be in there? Her face went flush. It's all coming around. Legitimate rape, birth control, guns , now this, they have alot on their plate. It takes alot to be a republican these days. I think she may be rethinking her party. Let's hope. But it's alot for such a regimental party to take, they are coming apart over these issues. Real life will be their downfall it's inevitable.

 

bongbong

(5,436 posts)
37. Yes, it's happening
Thu Dec 27, 2012, 07:25 PM
Dec 2012

> It takes alot to be a republican these days.

It was delicious irony to see the repigs spin from "talk only about wedge issues like abortion" to "don't you DARE mention abortion!" in about 3 days this past election season.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
16. Because it's never going to happen
Thu Dec 27, 2012, 12:19 AM
Dec 2012

You will not see a newspaper put up a website with the addresses and locations on a map of the folks who don't have their heads screwed on straight. Newspapers seem to draw the line at that.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
28. 5 myths about mass shootings.... Myth#1. The shooter is insane
Thu Dec 27, 2012, 03:38 PM
Dec 2012


http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/five-myths-about-mass-shootings/2012/07/27/gJQAcpB8DX_story.html




With 12 dead and 58 injured, the July 20 massacre at the midnight premiere of “The Dark Knight Rises” in Aurora, Colo., is one of the largest mass shootings in U.S. history. Aurora is only 20 miles from Columbine High School, where seniors Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold killed 13 and injured 24 in 1999. We may think we know what makes the perpetrators of mass shootings — mostly boys and men — tick. Though psychology doesn’t always lend itself to hard statistics, there are some patterns that might surprise you.

1. The shooters are insane.

The 2002 Safe School Initiative report, by the Secret Service and the Department of Education, looked at 41 attackers across 37 incidents from 1974 to 2000. It concluded that only 17 percent “had been diagnosed with mental health or behavior disorder prior to the attack.”

snip


Adult and teen shooters do not suddenly snap. Their anger and planning often develop over time. And the more they plan, the more an argument can be made, in the eyes of the law, that they are sane.
 

jody

(26,624 posts)
19. Mayor Thomas M. Menino of Boston and Mayor Michael Bloomberg of New York City, cochairmen of Mayors
Thu Dec 27, 2012, 12:46 AM
Dec 2012

Against Illegal Guns, along with 750 other Mayors want Obama to create a central data base that will include mental-health data on people.

idwiyo

(5,113 posts)
23. I am guessing because majority of the people might think its not a bad idea.
Thu Dec 27, 2012, 08:23 AM
Dec 2012

I bet even here on DU there are a lot of people who think it would be just fine and no big deal.



Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
25. I was disturbed by that. Not "mentally disturbed," though (just in case someone's going to
Thu Dec 27, 2012, 03:27 PM
Dec 2012

put me a in a database).

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
27. I heard it here on DU over and over. Yes. Here. Many DAYS before Mr. LaPierre brought it up
Thu Dec 27, 2012, 03:34 PM
Dec 2012

Plus its been embraced and theorized as a plausible "solution" to gun violence by no less than 750+ United States Mayors

(http://www.mayorsagainstillegalguns.org/html/home/demandaplan.html)



There are far, FAR too many people who believe that Adam Lanza "must" have had a mental illness to do what he did - even without a shred of evidence that he was mentally ill or was on meds. Doesn't matter in their mind - it "must" be so because otherwise they'd have to look at the real culprit - easy accessibility to firearms regardless of mental health.

The lumping in of gun violence perpetrators as "mentally ill" is disgusting but too many people don't see how abhorrent that is - so they simply accept the premise on its face and continue to smear and hurt good people.



Skittles

(153,202 posts)
30. because it is the rantings of a rightwing hack
Thu Dec 27, 2012, 03:54 PM
Dec 2012

if there was such a database, Mr. La Pierre would be entry number one

aikoaiko

(34,184 posts)
31. There are already mechanisms for placing those who should be prohibited from possessing...
Thu Dec 27, 2012, 04:02 PM
Dec 2012

...firearms due to danger to self or others due to mental illness. It involves due process and it is rarely used. The process was expanded and clarified when the NRA and Democrats worked together to improve the law.

Obviously most, the vast majority, of those with mental illness are not dangerous and don't deserve to be on a list of firearm prohibited persons.

Still there may be ways to improve the process of identifying those who are a danger to themselves or others and have that impact their access to firearms.

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
34. I am outraged
Thu Dec 27, 2012, 04:45 PM
Dec 2012

at the overall hateful, corrupt, self-destructive mindset of this nation, and have been for decades now. I no longer respond with outrage to the multitude of examples occurring every day. I've seen very little real commitment to positive change, so I simply expect them.

Posteritatis

(18,807 posts)
35. Because people are generally clueless about mental illness
Thu Dec 27, 2012, 04:47 PM
Dec 2012

And also because it's a group that's less able to defend itself than a lot of other scapegoat populations.

When most people hear "database of mentally ill people" they just think "we need to keep an eye on them gosh-darned crazy people anyway," as though 25% of the population is some monolithic, deadly entity.

 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
36. This, the definition of Ableism, is extremely revealing.
Thu Dec 27, 2012, 05:10 PM
Dec 2012

"Ableism; A term used to describe normal assumptions and practices that often lead to unequal treatment of people with apparent or assumed physical, intellectual, or behavioral differences. It could be said, ableism is about categorization and exclusion."

Given me by DU'er Neoma.

Who in history has not profited through demonizing The Other in order to hide their own evil? I am dual diagnosis and I will not allow this to stand, to go unremarked or unchallenged. Hundreds of people have died from guns or been injured since the Sandy Hook shooting, but evidently those are "part of the plan", to quote The Joker. No one seems to care about all of them. I think it's sick, it's a sign of a sick society if it is not upset by common, continuous gun violence.

 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
38. i am. but it's just more of the same, imo. imo, the original sin is the creation of the category
Thu Dec 27, 2012, 07:27 PM
Dec 2012

'mentally ill' as 'other' in the first place; in the second place, the 'mental health' establishment as a 'caring' establishment; and in the third place, the apparent love of seeing 'mass shooter' and 'mentally ill' as synonymous.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why is it no one is getti...