Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marble falls

(72,528 posts)
Tue Nov 4, 2025, 08:34 AM Nov 2025

Read: Trump transcript on crypto corruption claims that "60 Minutes" cut

Read: Trump transcript on crypto corruption claims that "60 Minutes" cut

https://www.axios.com/2025/11/04/trump-crypto-corruption-60-minutes-transcript?utm_source=firefox-newtab-en-us

O'DONNELL: So not concerned about the appearance of corruption with this?

TRUMP: I can't say, because — I can't say — I'm not concerned. I don't — I'd rather not have you ask the question. But I let you ask it. You just came to me and you said, "Can I ask another question?" And I said, yeah. This is the question —

O'DONNELL: And you answered —

TRUMP: I don't mind. Did I let you do it? I coulda walked away. I didn't have to answer this question. I'm proud to answer the question. You know why? We've taken crypto —

O'DONNELL: But just generally speak —

TRUMP: Excuse me. We're number one in crypto in the whole world. Other people wanna be. They're fighting like hell to be. But we're number one in crypto because I'm the president. Biden wanted to also, at the very end, you know, he totally switched his thing.

You know, Biden was totally in favor of crypto at the end. Do you know that many people that were indicted under Biden for crypto, at the very end before the election, were let go? You know why? He wanted the vote. We are number one in crypto and that's the only thing I care about. I don't want China or anybody else to take it away. It's a massive industry.

O'DONNELL: Mr. President, thank you.


https://www.axios.com/2025/11/03/trump-60-minutes-editing-criticism-binance

Dems float FCC probe of "60 Minutes" trimming Trump interview

What was omitted: The video cut O'Donnell's final question: "So not concerned about the appearance of corruption with this?"

Also omitted was Trump's stammering reply: "I can't say, because — I can't say — I'm not concerned. I don't — I'd rather not have you ask the question."

"60 Minutes paid me a lotta money," he said at one point. "And you don't have to put this on, because I don't wanna embarrass you, and I'm sure you're not — you have a great — I think you have a great, new leader," seemingly in reference to editor-in-chief Bari Weiss.





8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Read: Trump transcript on crypto corruption claims that "60 Minutes" cut (Original Post) marble falls Nov 2025 OP
"60 Minutes paid me a lotta money"...For what? For this interview? sop Nov 2025 #1
He has never, ever gotten his stories straight. marble falls Nov 2025 #2
I thought 60 Minutes was never going to cut or edit an interview again! yardwork Nov 2025 #3
That was then and this is now. Or something. marble falls Nov 2025 #4
It was 60 minutes that was not concerned about the appearance of corruption. unblock Nov 2025 #5
"I let you do it." What a piece of shit. Jbraybarten Nov 2025 #6
Norah O'donnell failed. spanone Nov 2025 #7
For a guy who pardoned the Binance fellow, yet said he didn't know who that person is, djt allegorical oracle Nov 2025 #8

sop

(19,282 posts)
1. "60 Minutes paid me a lotta money"...For what? For this interview?
Tue Nov 4, 2025, 08:51 AM
Nov 2025

Or is Trump referring to the $16 million CBS paid him in July 2025 to settle a lawsuit over the editing of a "60 Minutes" interview with Kamala Harris? (The settlement many thought was a bribe to facilitate approval of the pending merger with Skydance Media.)

yardwork

(69,642 posts)
3. I thought 60 Minutes was never going to cut or edit an interview again!
Tue Nov 4, 2025, 08:58 AM
Nov 2025

After the fuss Trump made about their editing of the interview with Harris.

unblock

(56,259 posts)
5. It was 60 minutes that was not concerned about the appearance of corruption.
Tue Nov 4, 2025, 09:23 AM
Nov 2025

Right wing billionaires have corrupted the media bit by bit over the last 45 years or so. Donnie corrupted cbs and 60 minutes overtly by suing them basically as a shakedown for merger approval.

Generally, in business, when someone sues you, and especially if they win at least a settlement, you stop doing business either them. It's just bad business.

In the case of media outlets, if they don't get sued again, it looks like the litigious person was happy with the result, so it looks like your coverage was biased in favor of the litigious person in order to avoid another lawsuit.

It was a no-win situation for 60 minutes, either they get sued again or they give the appearance of having been corrupted.

They apparently chose the latter, although I suppose it's still possible Donnie may sue, who knows.

allegorical oracle

(6,578 posts)
8. For a guy who pardoned the Binance fellow, yet said he didn't know who that person is, djt
Tue Nov 4, 2025, 11:23 AM
Nov 2025

seems determined to be the king of crypto. As usual, he's trying to have it both ways. If cornered, djt doesn't know much because his sons are handling "all that". But everybody knows that his sons are clearing everything they do through him first.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Read: Trump transcript on...