Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

orangecrush

(29,852 posts)
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 11:49 AM Nov 2025

Dimon on JPMorgan Chase not donating to White House ballroom: 'We have an issue'

JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon on Wednesday said his company will not donate money toward the White House’s ballroom construction, where the East Wing once stood.

In an interview with Dimon, CNN anchor Erin Burnett noted how JPMorgan Chase was not listed among the companies that have donated toward the project.

.....

“We have an issue, OK, which is anything we do, since we do a lot of contracts with governments here and around the world, we have to be very careful about how anything is perceived,” Dimon said. “And also how the next DOJ is going to deal with it.”


https://thehill.com/business/5593632-dimon-jpmorgan-white-house-ballroom/


“And also how the next DOJ is going to deal with it."

26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dimon on JPMorgan Chase not donating to White House ballroom: 'We have an issue' (Original Post) orangecrush Nov 2025 OP
Looking toward a future without criminals in our highest office UpInArms Nov 2025 #1
It's called foresight orangecrush Nov 2025 #2
At least someone has some foresight PatSeg Nov 2025 #25
Perhaps there is communicatiom that would make bribery charges easy to stick since this is before hand and not a "tip" JT45242 Nov 2025 #3
Imagine how many Special Prosecutors the next DOJ will have to appoint. sop Nov 2025 #4
Nope: in house prosecutions Prairie Gates Nov 2025 #6
Trump's going to need about a hundred Autopen machines to sign all the pardons. sop Nov 2025 #10
I like it orangecrush Nov 2025 #12
Maybe they can contribute to rebuilding the East wing when this Nazi shit is over Blues Heron Nov 2025 #5
Good idea orangecrush Nov 2025 #13
Finally. They have figured out that there will be life after Trump. Baitball Blogger Nov 2025 #7
My take as well. orangecrush Nov 2025 #14
Profile in courage, that one. Scrivener7 Nov 2025 #8
YNS... 2naSalit Nov 2025 #9
Or the Dark Lard-Ass's colon n/t BaronChocula Nov 2025 #16
To be fair... 2naSalit Nov 2025 #17
So technically BaronChocula Nov 2025 #18
Indeed... 2naSalit Nov 2025 #19
That last line gives me a modicum of hope Roxi Nov 2025 #11
That is the way most banks should be. I know when I worked for the Bank in Canada, all banks would Bev54 Nov 2025 #15
Hilarious D_Master81 Nov 2025 #20
18 U.S. Code § 201 Bluetus Nov 2025 #21
Chase has standards??? xuplate Nov 2025 #22
A 2028 Democratic Triumvirate 3825-87867 Nov 2025 #23
Whoa Looking Ahead! TY! Cha Nov 2025 #24
Bribery and extortion will look bad in daylight rurallib Nov 2025 #26

PatSeg

(52,988 posts)
25. At least someone has some foresight
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 02:42 PM
Nov 2025

This party ain't gonna last forever and some people need to be looking ahead.

JT45242

(3,985 posts)
3. Perhaps there is communicatiom that would make bribery charges easy to stick since this is before hand and not a "tip"
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 11:55 AM
Nov 2025

When JP Morgan as a company has the strongest moral and ethical compass -- let that sink in after the mortgage bubble, junk bonds, etc -- where is this country?

Prairie Gates

(7,788 posts)
6. Nope: in house prosecutions
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 12:00 PM
Nov 2025

1. Any ICE agent who acted illegally under the color of law.
2. Any federal employee or agency head who broke the law
3. Any official who took any kind of prohibited bribe, gift, or donation whatsoever.
4. Any official who broke or directed others to break the Hatch Act by illegally using a federal agency for the purpose of political advocacy.

Put them all in the federal penitentiary.

This should be a top-level item in the Dem platform.

2naSalit

(101,868 posts)
9. YNS...
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 12:19 PM
Nov 2025

Yeah, no shit!

The first time I appreciate anything that guy has ever said. Perhaps his head isn't all the way up his ass.

Roxi

(2,205 posts)
11. That last line gives me a modicum of hope
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 01:06 PM
Nov 2025

It’s nice to know someone is thinking about the future.

Bev54

(13,396 posts)
15. That is the way most banks should be. I know when I worked for the Bank in Canada, all banks would
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 01:39 PM
Nov 2025

contribute the maximum to each major party to avoid any partisanship.

D_Master81

(2,469 posts)
20. Hilarious
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 02:03 PM
Nov 2025

If there’s nothing wrong and it’s totally on the up and up why worry about future DOJ investigations? Basically admitting this whole ballroom sham is just a pay to play with the current, corrupt administration and once someone in there with actual ethics starts looking into it it would be bad for them.

Bluetus

(2,630 posts)
21. 18 U.S. Code § 201
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 02:08 PM
Nov 2025

18 U.S. Code § 201 prohibits giving/receiving anything of value to influence public officials, their acts, or witness testimony, or to commit fraud.

Criminal penalties, 15 years.

That's a clue. Instead of the usual, "We're looking forward, not back, let bygones be bygones" line, prominent Dems should be putting these people on notice that this has every appearance of a criminal act and will be treated as such in the next administration.if these people don't clean up their acts. When they go on media programs, they should specifically mention this statute in a discussion of the rule of law.

Likewise, everything the ICA agents are doing is on video. If they are committing illegal acts, the acants and the entire chain of command will be held responsible.

3825-87867

(1,895 posts)
23. A 2028 Democratic Triumvirate
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 02:12 PM
Nov 2025

With Elizabeth Warren asking corporations, "Can you say anti-trust?"
And our new President asking corporations, "Can you say Nationalize?"
And of course, the new DOJ asking ICE , Homan and Miller, "Can you say Nuremberg II?"
And what to do with the common magat/racist/fascists? Asking for Benito.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dimon on JPMorgan Chase n...