Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

orangecrush

(28,661 posts)
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 11:49 AM Nov 7

Dimon on JPMorgan Chase not donating to White House ballroom: 'We have an issue'

JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon on Wednesday said his company will not donate money toward the White House’s ballroom construction, where the East Wing once stood.

In an interview with Dimon, CNN anchor Erin Burnett noted how JPMorgan Chase was not listed among the companies that have donated toward the project.

.....

“We have an issue, OK, which is anything we do, since we do a lot of contracts with governments here and around the world, we have to be very careful about how anything is perceived,” Dimon said. “And also how the next DOJ is going to deal with it.”


https://thehill.com/business/5593632-dimon-jpmorgan-white-house-ballroom/


“And also how the next DOJ is going to deal with it."

26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dimon on JPMorgan Chase not donating to White House ballroom: 'We have an issue' (Original Post) orangecrush Nov 7 OP
Looking toward a future without criminals in our highest office UpInArms Nov 7 #1
It's called foresight orangecrush Nov 7 #2
At least someone has some foresight PatSeg Nov 7 #25
Perhaps there is communicatiom that would make bribery charges easy to stick since this is before hand and not a "tip" JT45242 Nov 7 #3
Imagine how many Special Prosecutors the next DOJ will have to appoint. sop Nov 7 #4
Nope: in house prosecutions Prairie Gates Nov 7 #6
Trump's going to need about a hundred Autopen machines to sign all the pardons. sop Nov 7 #10
I like it orangecrush Nov 7 #12
Maybe they can contribute to rebuilding the East wing when this Nazi shit is over Blues Heron Nov 7 #5
Good idea orangecrush Nov 7 #13
Finally. They have figured out that there will be life after Trump. Baitball Blogger Nov 7 #7
My take as well. orangecrush Nov 7 #14
Profile in courage, that one. Scrivener7 Nov 7 #8
YNS... 2naSalit Nov 7 #9
Or the Dark Lard-Ass's colon n/t BaronChocula Nov 7 #16
To be fair... 2naSalit Nov 7 #17
So technically BaronChocula Nov 7 #18
Indeed... 2naSalit Nov 7 #19
That last line gives me a modicum of hope Roxi Nov 7 #11
That is the way most banks should be. I know when I worked for the Bank in Canada, all banks would Bev54 Nov 7 #15
Hilarious D_Master81 Nov 7 #20
18 U.S. Code § 201 Bluetus Nov 7 #21
Chase has standards??? xuplate Nov 7 #22
A 2028 Democratic Triumvirate 3825-87867 Nov 7 #23
Whoa Looking Ahead! TY! Cha Nov 7 #24
Bribery and extortion will look bad in daylight rurallib Nov 7 #26

PatSeg

(52,262 posts)
25. At least someone has some foresight
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 02:42 PM
Nov 7

This party ain't gonna last forever and some people need to be looking ahead.

JT45242

(3,851 posts)
3. Perhaps there is communicatiom that would make bribery charges easy to stick since this is before hand and not a "tip"
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 11:55 AM
Nov 7

When JP Morgan as a company has the strongest moral and ethical compass -- let that sink in after the mortgage bubble, junk bonds, etc -- where is this country?

Prairie Gates

(7,252 posts)
6. Nope: in house prosecutions
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 12:00 PM
Nov 7

1. Any ICE agent who acted illegally under the color of law.
2. Any federal employee or agency head who broke the law
3. Any official who took any kind of prohibited bribe, gift, or donation whatsoever.
4. Any official who broke or directed others to break the Hatch Act by illegally using a federal agency for the purpose of political advocacy.

Put them all in the federal penitentiary.

This should be a top-level item in the Dem platform.

2naSalit

(100,179 posts)
9. YNS...
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 12:19 PM
Nov 7

Yeah, no shit!

The first time I appreciate anything that guy has ever said. Perhaps his head isn't all the way up his ass.

Roxi

(2,200 posts)
11. That last line gives me a modicum of hope
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 01:06 PM
Nov 7

It’s nice to know someone is thinking about the future.

Bev54

(13,223 posts)
15. That is the way most banks should be. I know when I worked for the Bank in Canada, all banks would
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 01:39 PM
Nov 7

contribute the maximum to each major party to avoid any partisanship.

D_Master81

(2,344 posts)
20. Hilarious
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 02:03 PM
Nov 7

If there’s nothing wrong and it’s totally on the up and up why worry about future DOJ investigations? Basically admitting this whole ballroom sham is just a pay to play with the current, corrupt administration and once someone in there with actual ethics starts looking into it it would be bad for them.

Bluetus

(2,333 posts)
21. 18 U.S. Code § 201
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 02:08 PM
Nov 7

18 U.S. Code § 201 prohibits giving/receiving anything of value to influence public officials, their acts, or witness testimony, or to commit fraud.

Criminal penalties, 15 years.

That's a clue. Instead of the usual, "We're looking forward, not back, let bygones be bygones" line, prominent Dems should be putting these people on notice that this has every appearance of a criminal act and will be treated as such in the next administration.if these people don't clean up their acts. When they go on media programs, they should specifically mention this statute in a discussion of the rule of law.

Likewise, everything the ICA agents are doing is on video. If they are committing illegal acts, the acants and the entire chain of command will be held responsible.

3825-87867

(1,809 posts)
23. A 2028 Democratic Triumvirate
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 02:12 PM
Nov 7

With Elizabeth Warren asking corporations, "Can you say anti-trust?"
And our new President asking corporations, "Can you say Nationalize?"
And of course, the new DOJ asking ICE , Homan and Miller, "Can you say Nuremberg II?"
And what to do with the common magat/racist/fascists? Asking for Benito.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dimon on JPMorgan Chase n...