Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy I Am Resigning: A federal judge explains his reasoning for leaving the bench.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2025/11/federal-judge-resignation-trump/684845/?gift=vf1DGKhD1xBHQ3siCRuAVcz-qxehhrT47kEa20qvhPE&utm_source=copy-link&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=shareIn 1985, president ronald reagan appointed me as a federal judge. I was 38 years old. At the time, I looked forward to serving for the rest of my life. However, I resigned Friday, relinquishing that lifetime appointment and giving up the opportunity for public service that I have loved.
My reason is simple: I no longer can bear to be restrained by what judges can say publicly or do outside the courtroom. President Donald Trump is using the law for partisan purposes, targeting his adversaries while sparing his friends and donors from investigation, prosecution, and possible punishment. This is contrary to everything that I have stood for in my more than 50 years in the Department of Justice and on the bench. The White Houses assault on the rule of law is so deeply disturbing to me that I feel compelled to speak out. Silence, for me, is now intolerable.
When I accepted the nomination to serve on the U.S. District Court in Massachusetts, I took pride in becoming part of a federal judiciary that works to make our countrys ideal of equal justice under law a reality. A judiciary that helps protect our democracy. That has the authority and responsibility to hold elected officials to the limits of the power delegated to them by the people. That strives to ensure that the rights of minority groups, no matter how they are viewed by others, are not violated. That can serve as a check on corruption to prevent public officials from unlawfully enriching themselves. Becoming a federal judge was an ideal opportunity to extend a noble tradition that I had been educated by experience to treasure.
My public service began in 1974, near the end of Richard Nixons presidency, at a time of dishonor for the Department of Justice. Nixons first attorney general, John Mitchell, who had also been the presidents campaign manager, later went to prison for his role in the break-in at the Democratic headquarters at the Watergate complex and for perjury in attempting to cover up that crime. His successor, Richard Kleindienst, was convicted of contempt of Congress for lying about the fact that, as instructed by the president, hed ended an antitrust investigation of a major company after it pledged to make a $400,000 contribution to the Republican National Convention. The Justice Department was also discredited by revelations that FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover had obtained and disseminated derogatory information about political adversaries, including Martin Luther King Jr.
*snip*
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why I Am Resigning: A federal judge explains his reasoning for leaving the bench. (Original Post)
Nevilledog
Nov 2025
OP
He said his successor has already been appointed, so Turnip doesn't get to choose who it is. nt
eppur_se_muova
Nov 2025
#5
superpatriotman
(6,870 posts)1. So now Krasnov gets to nominate a new judge?
Seems reasonable. Thank you for your service, I guess.
UpInArms
(54,973 posts)3. Maybe there is be a book to flog
eppur_se_muova
(41,938 posts)5. He said his successor has already been appointed, so Turnip doesn't get to choose who it is. nt
GJGCA
(283 posts)6. TY. (Geeze sometimes this place...) nt
malaise
(296,081 posts)2. Well said Justice Wolf
K& R for visibility
eppur_se_muova
(41,938 posts)4. A good read, not really that long, but informative. Especially relevant to those who didn't live through Watergate. nt