General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFederal court blocks Texas from using new congressional gerrymander in 2026 midterms
Federal court blocks Texas from using new congressional gerrymander in 2026 midterms
The decision is a major blow for Republicans, including President Donald Trump, who had pushed Texas GOP leaders to draw new lines to help protect the partys narrow U.S. House majority.
by Eleanor Klibanoff Nov. 18, 2025, 12:08 p.m. Central
https://www.texastribune.org/2025/11/18/texas-redistricting-ruling-lawsuit-el-paso-court-2026-midterms/
-snip-
The public perception of this case is that its about politics, U.S. Judge Jeffrey Brown, a Trump appointee, wrote in the ruling. To be sure, politics played a role in drawing the 2025 Map. But it was much more than just politics. Substantial evidence shows that Texas racially gerrymandered the 2025 Map.
Brown ordered that the 2026 congressional election shall proceed under the map that the Texas Legislature enacted in 2021. The case will likely be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, but time is short: Candidates only have until Dec. 8 to file for the upcoming election.
The decision is a major blow for Republicans, in Texas and nationally, who pushed through this unusual mid-decade redistricting at the behest of President Donald Trump. They were hoping the new map would yield control of 30 of the states 38 congressional districts up from the 25 they currently hold and help protect the narrow GOP majority in the U.S. House.
The map cleared the GOP-controlled Legislature in August and was quickly signed into law by Gov. Greg Abbott. Several advocacy groups sued over the new district lines, saying lawmakers intentionally diluted the voting power of Black and Hispanic Texans and drew racially gerrymandered maps. Over the course of a nine-day hearing in El Paso earlier this month, they aimed to convince the judges that it was in voters best interest to shelve the new map until a full trial could be held.
- big snip -
bif
(26,995 posts)marble falls
(71,919 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(179,832 posts)The decision is a major blow for Republicans, including President Donald Trump, who had pushed Texas GOP leaders to draw new lines to help protect the partys narrow U.S. House majority.
Breaking: Federal court blocks Texas from using new congressional gerrymander in 2026 midterms.
— Texas Tribune (@texastribune.org) 2025-11-18T18:30:03.820Z
https://www.texastribune.org/2025/11/18/texas-redistricting-ruling-lawsuit-el-paso-court-2026-midterms/
The decision is a major blow for Republicans, in Texas and nationally, who pushed through this unusual mid-decade redistricting at the behest of President Donald Trump. They were hoping the new map would yield control of 30 of the states 38 congressional districts up from the 25 they currently hold and help protect the narrow GOP majority in the U.S. House.
The public perception of this case is that its about politics, U.S. Judge Jeffrey Brown, a Trump appointee, wrote in the ruling striking down the new lines. To be sure, politics played a role in drawing the 2025 Map. But it was much more than just politics. Substantial evidence shows that Texas racially gerrymandered the 2025 Map.
Brown ordered that the 2026 congressional election shall proceed under the map that the Texas Legislature enacted in 2021. The case will likely be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, but time is short: Candidates only have until Dec. 8 to file for the upcoming election.......
It was not immediately clear if the state still has a legal path to restoring the new map in time for 2026. Unlike most federal lawsuits, which are heard by a single district judge and then appealed to a circuit court, voting rights lawsuits are initially heard by two district judges and one circuit judge, and their ruling can only be appealed directly to the U.S. Supreme Court.
LetMyPeopleVote
(179,832 posts)I have been volunteering on election law/voting rights matters since 2004 and Prof. Hasen is a great source of information in this area. This dissent is nuts
Judge Jerry Smith Issues His 104-Page Dissent to Yesterdayâs 3-Judge District Court Holding that Texasâs Re-Redistricting is Likely an Unconstitutional Racial Gerrymander. Along the Way He Calls Out the âPerniciousâ & âOutrageousâ Behavior of Judge Brown in the Majority electionlawblog.org?p=153106
— Rick Hasen (@rickhasen.bsky.social) 2025-11-19T20:44:24.987Z
https://electionlawblog.org/?p=153106
In my 37 years on the federal bench, this is the most outrageous conduct by a judge that I have ever encountered in a case in which I have been involved.
In summary, Judge Brown has issued a 160-page opinion without giving me any reasonable opportunity to respond. I will set forth the details. The readers can judge for themselves.
And then turning to the merits:
The main winners from Judge Browns opinion are George Soros andmGavin Newsom. The obvious losers are the People of Texas and the Rule of Law. I dissent.
In the interest of time, this dissent is, admittedly, disjointed. Usually, in dissenting from an opinion of this length, I would spend more days refining and reorganizing the dissent for purposes of impact and readability. But that approach is not reasonably possible here because these two judges have not allowed it.
The resulting dissent is far from a literary masterpiece. If, however, there were a Nobel Prize for Fiction, Judge Browns opinion would be a prime candidate.
[This post is in progress]
See also
Link to tweet

I tried to read this dissent but is very disjointed and poorly written