General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsi suspect they have already edited the epstein files
they have already removed any truly damming evidence against the fat slob and probbaly replaced it with fabricated evidence against leading democrats
Ocelot II
(130,536 posts)There are voluminous materials in both paper and electronic form, located at various agencies and under the control of various people. It's not like they just can stuff a big pile of paper into a shredder and it's gone. Once something has been been digitized it gets as many legs as a centipede, and it becomes easily copiable - and leakable. And it would be a federal crime to destroy or alter any of the materials, and if some low level employee is asked to do that, what would stop them from going to the media? One reason it would be easy to discover whether documents are missing is the Bates stamp. Most legal file document pages are given a number that's stamped on the page with an ink stamp that rolls to the next number for the next page. If there's a gap in the numbers (and a forged stamp would be easy to identify), that would show that a page is missing, either from the original document or from a scanned version. They might try some funny business, but discovering something is missing creates its own scandal. Remember Nixon's missing 18-1/2 minutes?
BannonsLiver
(20,595 posts)Ocelot II
(130,536 posts)BannonsLiver
(20,595 posts)WarGamer
(18,613 posts)RockRaven
(19,375 posts)There will be footprints, voids, etc. which will catch them out.
BannonsLiver
(20,595 posts)Full stop. It couldnt be more obvious.
WarGamer
(18,613 posts)Everything in these files was digitized at some point.
You're proposing that a document scanned as evidence years ago... under a different DoJ can be edited and no one would notice??
That's not how it works.
There are multiple ways to verify... call logs are verifiable on both ends... digitized files have a digital custodial trail left behind...
I mean... I understand the need to emote... but reality is reality
ProfessorGAC
(76,706 posts)I believe it has been fully sanitized.
WarGamer
(18,613 posts)You're saying that no one looked at them before Trump DoJ?
usonian
(25,324 posts)https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220810679
DOJ means "Defenders of Jeffrey"

The Andrew formerly known as Prince was taken down by Giuffre's posthumously published book.
More dirt came from Epstein family emails.
Witnesses are coming forward now that the dam has broken, and investigations into the money flow (enormous) and money laundering on a global scale are beginning. Harder to hide. Even bitcoin is easy to track.
I believe that Senator Ron Wyden has been beating this drum.
Apres Andrew, le deluge. DOJ (Defenders of Jeffries) not needed.
It only takes "so much" to break a gigantic secretive operation.
------------ reposts ------------
There should be sufficient independent evidence uncovered to trash the major players.
-- The bit players will fall down as a consequence.
Some material already on hand:
The Epstein Document Archive
https://www.epsteinarchive.org/
Epstein Flight Logs (USA vs. Maxwell)
Document Date: 2021-11-29
https://www.epsteinarchive.org/docs/flight-logs/
We mapped Jeffrey Epstein's social network. Here's what we found.
https://america2.news/we-mapped-jeffrey-epsteins-social-network-heres-what-we-found/
Sample:

This links to the full image.
You can download it to expand it if your browser won't, due to HTML and CSS constraints.
Hakeem Jeffries Says Trump Is Running Pedophile Protection Program
https://newrepublic.com/post/202623/hakeem-jeffries-trump-johnson-republicans-pedophile-protection-program
Thats what theyve been doing. And thats the reason why they refuse to swear in Representative-elect Adelita Grijalva, for weeks now, Jeffries added, referring to the congresswoman who won a special election on September 23 to replace her late father, Representative Raúl Grijalva. She was elected in late September decisively.
Jeffries said that Grijalva hasnt been sworn in by House Speaker Johnson because she would be the deciding vote on legislation requiring the Department of Justice to release the Epstein files.
Week after week after week have gone by, and Representative-elect Adelita Grijalva is unable to serve 800,000 people in the state of Arizona all because of the pedophile protection program being run by Mike Johnson and House Republicans at the direction of their boss, Donald J. Trump, Jeffries added.
Add Senator Chris Murphy.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220809213
What we've already seen is immensely incriminating; clearly, Donald Trump was at the center of a child sex ring, Murphy said, speaking over the weekend with The Bulwark Managing Editor Sam Stein during a panel. That is heartbreaking that the president of the United States was involved in that kind of gross, craven immorality.
*****
He is in daily panic mode as we get closer to the moment where these files and the fullest truth that we have available to us is going to be made public, and it is clearly the biggest scandal in presidential history, Murphy said.
...It stands to reason that he wouldn't be fighting so hard to spin against this story, or bullying Republicans in the House to prevent the release of these files if there wasn't something especially and specifically incriminating in that information.
And a long discussion on Trumps possible fit in the global scheme.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220735608
Just hear me out, what if he's not just in the Epstein files
But actually a part of the trafficking ring. He ran the Rump Modeling Agency and owned the Miss Teen America Pagent.
ADDED: He should be on suicide watch.
