Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEpstein Files Bill Allowing Bondi to 'Redact' Details Comes Under Scrutiny
...the bill does allow Bondi to redact records in specific instances, including documents that "would jeopardize an active federal investigation or ongoing prosecution."
https://www.newsweek.com/epstein-files-bill-allowing-pam-bondi-redact-details-comes-under-scrutiny-11072704
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Epstein Files Bill Allowing Bondi to 'Redact' Details Comes Under Scrutiny (Original Post)
SamuelTheThird
Nov 2025
OP
CanonRay
(16,171 posts)1. We'll never see shit.
Just my humble and 100% cynical opinion
in2herbs
(4,389 posts)2. For every redaction Bondi must write the reason(s) and file her reason(s) with Congress. Today's (11/19)
Elizabeth McLaughlin's substack was a line by line legal synopsis of HR 4405 (the Epstein Act). I recommend listening to her synopsis as it will probably lower your blood pressure.
kbowman
(21 posts)3. We need a Mark Felt
We need a Mark Felt to come forward and leak the documents before any alterations are made.
MichMan
(17,149 posts)4. Scrutiny by whom?
Every single member of the House and Senate, except one, voted for it.
427-1 in the House and Unanimous Consent in the Senate.