Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fiendish Thingy

(23,226 posts)
Wed Nov 19, 2025, 09:10 PM Nov 2025

DU Trump 2.0 lawyer disbarment betting pool: those who picked Lindsey Halligan, looks like you're a winner!

https://www.emptywheel.net/2025/11/19/lindsey-the-insurance-lawyer-confesses-there-is-no-indictment/

What a bunch of, as Bugs used to say, maroons.

And to think people got upset when Garland crossed his T’s and dotted his i’s instead of rushing at light speed to present to a grand jury to get an indictment, which would later be dismissed with prejudice (meaning charges can’t be refiled) as is almost certain to be the case with Comey’s charges.
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DU Trump 2.0 lawyer disbarment betting pool: those who picked Lindsey Halligan, looks like you're a winner! (Original Post) Fiendish Thingy Nov 2025 OP
Re: Garland Gore1FL Nov 2025 #1
You must have missed all those indictments Fiendish Thingy Nov 2025 #3
I didn't miss this: Gore1FL Nov 2025 #5
Did you read those articles? Fiendish Thingy Nov 2025 #6
It was about that. But you derailed it yourself with your last comment. Gore1FL Nov 2025 #7
Ty Cobb-Attorney General Pam Bondi and interim U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan should be disbarred LetMyPeopleVote Nov 2025 #2
I liked your thread until the last paragraph, gab13by13 Nov 2025 #4

Fiendish Thingy

(23,226 posts)
3. You must have missed all those indictments
Wed Nov 19, 2025, 09:36 PM
Nov 2025

You’re not giving Jack Smith all the credit for those are you?

Fiendish Thingy

(23,226 posts)
6. Did you read those articles?
Wed Nov 19, 2025, 10:16 PM
Nov 2025

They actually prove that an investigation was launched while Trump was still in office, and that Garland created a dedicated team to investigate Trump in June 2021.

The “resistance” mentioned in the titles of those articles came not from Garland, but from pro-Trump career employees at DOJ and FBI. Despite that resistance, interference, and delay from Trumpers in the agencies, Garland persevered, fought privilege claims in the courts, got search warrants, and gathered air tight, solid evidence so that when his team became Smith’s team, they could hit the ground running and finish the job.

Jack Smith started on third base thanks to Garland.

But this thread about Halligan rushing incompetently to the Grand Jury, no T’s crossed, which will result in Comey’s charges being dropped, and Halligan likely getting disbarred.

Gore1FL

(22,951 posts)
7. It was about that. But you derailed it yourself with your last comment.
Wed Nov 19, 2025, 10:37 PM
Nov 2025

This sub-thread wouldn't exist without it. If you didn't want to discuss this, perhaps, not bringing it up in the first place might have been the best strategy.

gab13by13

(32,318 posts)
4. I liked your thread until the last paragraph,
Wed Nov 19, 2025, 09:59 PM
Nov 2025

Still beating a dead horse? Garland didn't have any T's to cross or i's to dot.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»DU Trump 2.0 lawyer disba...