Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tanuki

(16,229 posts)
Wed Dec 3, 2025, 06:41 AM Wednesday

Hegseth told U.S. soldiers in Iraq to ignore legal advice on rules of engagement

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/dec/02/hegseth-us-soldiers-iraq-rules-engagement

"Pete Hegseth, the US defense secretary, told soldiers under his command in Iraq to ignore legal advice about when they were permitted to kill enemy combatants under their rules of engagement.

The anecdote is contained in a book Hegseth wrote last year in which he also repeatedly railed against the constraints placed on “American warfighters” by the laws of war and the Geneva conventions.
....
Prof David M Crane, a former chief prosecutor of the UN special court for Sierra Leone, distinguished scholar in residence at Syracuse University College of Law and an army veteran with 20 years’ service, including stints as a JAG attorney, said obeying rules of engagement was crucial and that those who break them should face sanction.

“After the tragedy of My Lai in 1968, we have tried to avoid another one and prosecute those that do in fact stray. And that happened particularly in Iraq, at Fallujah, and other places in defense, where we had some marines go south and commit war crimes, and they’re prosecuted for it,” he said.
.. .
In
his book, however, Hegseth called into question the entire edifice of laws of conflict, writing: “If our warriors are forced to follow rules arbitrarily and asked to sacrifice more lives so that international tribunals feel better about themselves, aren’t we just better off winning our wars according to our own rules?! Who cares what other countries think.”.... (more)
32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hegseth told U.S. soldiers in Iraq to ignore legal advice on rules of engagement (Original Post) Tanuki Wednesday OP
Question Coldwater Wednesday #1
And then there is this malaise Wednesday #2
He should resign. He's a disgrace. But he won't. sinkingfeeling Wednesday #3
You Go Pete BOSSHOG Wednesday #4
"Do not speak to me of rules! This is war! This is not a game of cricket!" Wednesdays Wednesday #25
sea cruise poozwah Wednesday #5
Now that might come close to justice. Tie him up in a fishing boat on his back so he can see the approaching planes. travelingthrulife Wednesday #20
He needs to face legal consequences IronLionZion Wednesday #6
Like the sorts of things the Geneva Convention outlawed that he thinks are holding troops back Attilatheblond Wednesday #23
Kick dalton99a Wednesday #7
Since Hegseth doeas believe laws are rule should be followed liberalgunwilltravel Wednesday #8
This maniac and his boss will cross the line from killing enemy combatants to "the enemy within" Martin Eden Wednesday #9
Do you think these ass holes watch old WWII movies Dread Pirate Roberts Wednesday #10
Achtung..You VILL obey..und..you VILL like it! BattleRow Wednesday #32
Just a thought.... FarPoint Wednesday #11
They were well aware of his defense of Ed Gallagher Tanuki Wednesday #15
And he was still confirmed!!!! FarPoint Wednesday #16
Tie vote Retrograde Wednesday #19
Well..... FarPoint Wednesday #27
And yet Im sure hes okay Swift Boating John Kerry Johonny Wednesday #12
Hitler's Barbarossa Decree (1941) allowed the summary execution of the "enemy." sop Wednesday #13
"Who cares what other countries think .." Bo Zarts Wednesday #14
They seem to be born without empathy. travelingthrulife Wednesday #21
Could be genetic. Search empathy and genes Attilatheblond Wednesday #24
Kill Anything That Moves spike jones Wednesday #17
I had an "uncle" that told me all sorts of truly horrific stories about Vietnam dingosatemyusername Wednesday #28
Low IQ individual ecstatic Wednesday #18
"The senators ... need to be held accountable." Wednesdays Wednesday #26
Rump, Hegseth, et al, pretend tough guys and gals who act forcefully above the law on every txwhitedove Wednesday #22
Video of Hegseth Telling Military Not to Follow 'Illegal Orders' Resurfaces (from 2016, when Obama was president) progree Wednesday #29
The pardons will go to Kegsbreath and maybe a General or Admiral but the grunts will pay. Buddyzbuddy Wednesday #30
If your read the full article... EAB Wednesday #31

BOSSHOG

(44,314 posts)
4. You Go Pete
Wed Dec 3, 2025, 07:39 AM
Wednesday

Tell our Soldiers to kill em all, let your MAGA god sort them out. We don’t need know stinking rules. It’s hard to follow rules.

Wednesdays

(21,493 posts)
25. "Do not speak to me of rules! This is war! This is not a game of cricket!"
Wed Dec 3, 2025, 11:20 AM
Wednesday

-- Bridge on the River Kwai

poozwah

(388 posts)
5. sea cruise
Wed Dec 3, 2025, 07:48 AM
Wednesday

i think the defense secretary/war secretary/macho man is in need of a night voyage off the coast of Venezuela.

travelingthrulife

(4,075 posts)
20. Now that might come close to justice. Tie him up in a fishing boat on his back so he can see the approaching planes.
Wed Dec 3, 2025, 10:09 AM
Wednesday

Attilatheblond

(7,991 posts)
23. Like the sorts of things the Geneva Convention outlawed that he thinks are holding troops back
Wed Dec 3, 2025, 10:27 AM
Wednesday

That protection works both ways, protects OUR troops from certain barbaric treatments along with protecting enemy combatants, but the drunk sadist just doesn't think that far ahead.

liberalgunwilltravel

(1,029 posts)
8. Since Hegseth doeas believe laws are rule should be followed
Wed Dec 3, 2025, 08:27 AM
Wednesday

Then I am sure he wouldn't mind being summarily executed, right?

Martin Eden

(15,246 posts)
9. This maniac and his boss will cross the line from killing enemy combatants to "the enemy within"
Wed Dec 3, 2025, 08:36 AM
Wednesday

On Sep 30 at Quantico, all our top military leaders from around the world were gathered to hear speeches from Trump and Hegseth. Among his usual partisan rants and off topic rambling, Trump said he wanted to use US cities as "training grounds" for the military.

Hegseth in his speech said the old rules of engagement would be discarded to take the handcuffs off our military so they could do what they do best -- "kill people and break things."

Pretty straightforward to add each one of those statements and come up with two, which I'm sure Mark Kelly and the other five Democratic lawmakers did. Their video was not some random partisan attack; they saw illegal orders already being carried out off the coast of Venezuela, and felt duty bound to remind our military leaders of their sworn oath and what is in the US Code of Military Justice.

FarPoint

(14,413 posts)
11. Just a thought....
Wed Dec 3, 2025, 09:16 AM
Wednesday

He did go thru the Congress to be affirmed....Did anyone hear/ or know of this Iraq view by Hegseth then? f so, was this explored by the Congress then????

Tanuki

(16,229 posts)
15. They were well aware of his defense of Ed Gallagher
Wed Dec 3, 2025, 09:27 AM
Wednesday

and other adjudicated war criminals.

https://time.com/7176342/pete-hegseth-donald-trump-pardon-war-crimes-military/

..."Hegseth, a military veteran, staunch defender of Trump’s "America First" agenda, and an outspoken critic of what he calls the military’s "woke" culture, has built a career around challenging the military establishment. He held an influential role in advocating for Trump to intervene on behalf of service members in three cases involving war crime accusations in 2019—cases that divided the military and ignited fierce debates over the limits of executive power and military accountability.
...
Gallagher was charged by the Navy with multiple crimes, including shooting civilians in Iraq, using a knife to kill a teenage Islamic State prisoner in Iraq in 2017, and threatening to kill fellow SEALs if they reported him. Gallagher was acquitted of murder by a military jury but convicted on one count of posing for photographs with the deceased body. His rank was reduced by one step as punishment. Trump reversed Gallagher’s demotion, restoring his rank and benefits.
....
The Washington Post reported at the time that Hegseth had personally lobbied Trump on the service members’ behalf, making frequent appeals through his Fox News platform and arguing that that the military has been tainted by political correctness. "You train someone to go and fight and kill the enemy, then they kill the enemy the way someone doesn’t like, and then we put them in jail," Hegseth argued on his Fox News program in Nov. 2019."...(more)

FarPoint

(14,413 posts)
27. Well.....
Wed Dec 3, 2025, 12:09 PM
Wednesday

at least the Democrats did their best.... Vance needs to own this too then....

sop

(17,112 posts)
13. Hitler's Barbarossa Decree (1941) allowed the summary execution of the "enemy."
Wed Dec 3, 2025, 09:18 AM
Wednesday

The decree stated the enemy was to be "ruthlessly eliminated in battle or during attempts to escape...suppressed by the army on the spot by using extreme measures, till [their] annihilation." That every officer..."will be entitled to perform execution(s) without trial, without any formalities, on any person suspected of having a hostile attitude towards the Germans." And German soldiers who committed "crimes against humanity are to be exempted from criminal responsibility, even if they commit acts punishable according to German law."

Bo Zarts

(26,215 posts)
14. "Who cares what other countries think .."
Wed Dec 3, 2025, 09:21 AM
Wednesday

The crux of MAGAism. It is only us, we, and me-me-me. It is Melania's cape .. "I REALLY DON'T CARE. DO U?"

Attilatheblond

(7,991 posts)
24. Could be genetic. Search empathy and genes
Wed Dec 3, 2025, 10:39 AM
Wednesday
https://biologyinsights.com/is-there-an-empathy-gene-the-genetic-links-to-compassion/

Of course, environment/upbringing has impact too, but genes are the framework individuals work with.

Are There “Empathy Genes”?

The notion of a singular “empathy gene” simplifying such a multifaceted human trait is not supported by scientific evidence. Empathy emerges from the subtle contributions of many different genes interacting in complex ways. Genetic influences involve predispositions, meaning certain genetic variations might make an individual more inclined towards empathic responses.

These genetic influences establish a foundational range for an individual’s potential empathic capacity. However, they do not determine a fixed outcome. Instead, genetic factors create a biological framework upon which life experiences build.
Key Genes Associated with Empathy

Research has identified several genes and genetic pathways associated with various aspects of empathy and prosocial behaviors. The oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) has garnered attention; oxytocin is a neuropeptide often called the “love hormone” due to its role in social bonding and trust. Variations in the OXTR gene can influence how effectively oxytocin signals are received in the brain, potentially affecting social cognition and emotional responsiveness.

The arginine vasopressin receptor 1A gene (AVPR1A) is another gene of interest. Vasopressin, like oxytocin, is a neuropeptide involved in social behaviors, including pair bonding and aggression. Differences in the AVPR1A gene have been linked to variations in social communication and altruistic behaviors. Genes involved in the serotonin system, such as the serotonin transporter gene (SLC6A4), have also been explored. Serotonin is a neurotransmitter that regulates mood and social behavior, and specific variants of SLC6A4 have been associated with differing sensitivities to social cues and emotional experiences.

ecstatic

(34,992 posts)
18. Low IQ individual
Wed Dec 3, 2025, 10:02 AM
Wednesday

First, there's nothing arbitrary about it unless some military leaders are breaking the rules while others enforce the rules. If everyone in command is following and enforcing the rules, there shouldn't be a problem.

Second, if we adopt an "anything goes" stance, guess what? That affects the safety of our troops. Hell, our conduct affects the safety of the world as well. How can the US convince other nations to follow a code of conduct when we're regularly violating the same standards?

Shit... now I'm back to being so disappointed in so many people. Whiskey pete *openly" confessed to breaking the law and yet he was still confirmed?! There's no fucking excuse for this shit. Especially now in the age of AI--which could have summarized and found all the red flags in his book within seconds. The senators who confirmed pete need to be held accountable.

Wednesdays

(21,493 posts)
26. "The senators ... need to be held accountable."
Wed Dec 3, 2025, 11:33 AM
Wednesday

Well, there's the rub. Who's going to hold them accountable?

Impeachment? Yeah, right. You'd need 19 Repug senators to convict.

txwhitedove

(4,302 posts)
22. Rump, Hegseth, et al, pretend tough guys and gals who act forcefully above the law on every
Wed Dec 3, 2025, 10:14 AM
Wednesday

whim saying they saw, knew, and controlled all..., but when questioned by realism, say they didn't know, weren't informed, say what?? Who The Fuck is in charge??

progree

(12,644 posts)
29. Video of Hegseth Telling Military Not to Follow 'Illegal Orders' Resurfaces (from 2016, when Obama was president)
Wed Dec 3, 2025, 12:43 PM
Wednesday

Now posted in LBN --
Video of Hegseth Telling Military Not to Follow 'Illegal Orders' Resurfaces, Newsweek, 12/3/25
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143576230

Buddyzbuddy

(1,992 posts)
30. The pardons will go to Kegsbreath and maybe a General or Admiral but the grunts will pay.
Wed Dec 3, 2025, 01:14 PM
Wednesday

Think before you act.

EAB

(9 posts)
31. If your read the full article...
Wed Dec 3, 2025, 06:41 PM
Wednesday

It´s clear that Pete was offended that soldiers in Iraq would have to wait until someone with an RPG actually pointed the weapon before shooting them, that it was terrible that people couldn't just be chill when strangers walked around with lethal weapons.

In other words, good old Pete was offended that soldiers should have to live like parents out in public with their kids in open carry states.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hegseth told U.S. soldier...