General Discussion

applegrove

(129,529 posts) Wed Dec 3, 2025, 08:09 PM Wednesday

The House GOP is collapsing under its own chaos:

Last edited Wed Dec 3, 2025, 08:40 PM - Edit history (1)

Trumpâ€™s gerrymander cheat scheme isnâ€™t going to fix thisâ€¦

The House GOP is collapsing from its own chaos, and Speaker Johnson is the guy left sweeping up the mess he never really had the power to contain.
— Christopher Webb (@cwebbonline.com) 2025-12-02T22:29:46.974Z

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The House GOP is collapsing under its own chaos: (Original Post) applegrove Wednesday OP

Oh well. tanyev Wednesday #1

NYT headline mercuryblues Wednesday #2

So bronxiteforever Wednesday #3

K&R spanone Wednesday #4

What is it with Republicans and that "suppressed grimace face"? ThoughtCriminal Wednesday #5

Johnson could solve this by acting as the effing Speaker of the House BlueNProud Wednesday #6

tanyev

(48,448 posts)

1. Oh well.

Reply to applegrove (Original post)

Wed Dec 3, 2025, 08:23 PM

Wednesday

mercuryblues

(16,085 posts)

2. NYT headline

Reply to applegrove (Original post)

Wed Dec 3, 2025, 08:39 PM

Wednesday

Democrats in disarray. How republican chaos is bad for the Democrats.

bronxiteforever

(11,008 posts)

3. So

Reply to applegrove (Original post)

Wed Dec 3, 2025, 08:48 PM

Wednesday

spanone

(140,832 posts)

4. K&R

Reply to applegrove (Original post)

Wed Dec 3, 2025, 08:49 PM

Wednesday

ThoughtCriminal

(14,693 posts)

5. What is it with Republicans and that "suppressed grimace face"?

Reply to applegrove (Original post)

Wed Dec 3, 2025, 10:16 PM

Wednesday

"Shame face", Or whatever you call it. The one they usually wear at the press conference after a humiliating scandal has surfaced.

Seems like Mike Johnson has it almost all the time.

BlueNProud

(1,069 posts)

6. Johnson could solve this by acting as the effing Speaker of the House

Reply to applegrove (Original post)

Wed Dec 3, 2025, 10:24 PM

Wednesday

As opposed to Tramp's Bayou messenger boy.

Reply to this discussion