General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTURBO AI!!!!!
I just saw an add for a vending machine - The Genius Vend AI Smart vending machine. Yep, an AI vending machine - is that dumb or what?
Remember "Turbo"? It all started with "Turbo Pascal". It became the go-to product name prefix for software and other tech products. Everything became "Turbo". Turbo-this, Turbo-that. It lives on in TurboTax.
Same with the i prefix - started with iPhone. And "e". There are all sorts of iThnigs and eThings.
"AI" - a step up from "Intelligent", which is a step up from "Smart".
Well, the new Turbo is AI. Everything has to be "AI enabled" - whether it is or not. My guess is that about 90% of "AI" is just plain old software. Not even "smart" or "intelligent".
Beartracks
(14,265 posts)
============
reACTIONary
(6,902 posts)reACTIONary
(6,902 posts)
Arthur_Frain
(2,259 posts)know that it all started (and still resides in) Max Headroom.
All hail Matt Frewer, a truly unsung comedic genius.
usonian
(22,923 posts) Ingredients chosen by AI
Color chosen by AI
Packaging Chosen by AI
Flavor chosen by AI
Here is THE ALTMAN JOY CANDY BAR

And here's the magic.
THE INGREDIENTS ARE ENTIRELY A.I.

ARTIFICIAL INGREDIENTS
Designed by supercomputer and created in nuclear fusion labs.
Why? Because if we don't do it, the enemy will beat us to it, and we'll have an AI Food Gap.

Note: Each candy bar takes approximately 1 Terawatt of electrical power to produce.
reACTIONary
(6,902 posts)Stickers for you.


save or just "copy image url"
Custom orders gladly accepted, but after the damn chores are done here.
Intractable
(1,464 posts)Might be 40 years ago, but you never forget your first (programming language, that is).
Actually, it was BASIC, but TP was much better.
reACTIONary
(6,902 posts).... it was a REAL programing language, and it was AFFORDABLE!
I know that there or those who would dis Pascal, but it is actually a pretty decent, modern, theoretically correct programing language, unlike BASIC.
Intractable
(1,464 posts)But I set up my programs with a procedure style and modularity I learned in Pascal.
cayugafalls
(5,947 posts)Bit mapped cards and all.
It was way overkill for that first programming class and the prof even said so, but I got an A so all good.
hunter
(40,285 posts)... and it's pretty easy to convert to freepascal.
https://www.freepascal.org/
I have all the computers I used regularly, going back to the late 'seventies, emulated on my Linux desktop. Free Pascal covers all of them but the Atari 800 and the homebrew 1802 machines.
reACTIONary
(6,902 posts)Intractable
(1,464 posts)My first was an Atari 800.
Emrys
(8,884 posts)IIRC, it made an LED on the front panel light up. That was all it did.
If it had worked as intended, it would have made my PC run at half speed.
mr715
(2,522 posts)Use books.
jfz9580m
(16,357 posts)By relabelling ANI AI.
Those Ai agents make LLMs look good.
I hate those things.
Ai agent
.
Just two hours is all it takes for an Ai agent to reproduce your personality!
https://www.livescience.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/just-2-hours-is-all-it-takes-for-ai-agents-to-replicate-your-personality-with-85-percent-accuracy
In a new study published Nov. 15 to the preprint database arXiv, researchers from Google and Stanford University created "simulation agents" essentially, AI replicas of 1,052 individuals based on two-hour interviews with each participant. These interviews were used to train a generative AI model designed to mimic human behavior.
While I do not dispute that two hours is more than enough time to get an accurate replica of the personalities of the mercenaries who work at Google and Stanford (with apologies to Paul Ehrlich, Rodolfo Dirzo and the Woods Institute), it may not work for the normal, complex and nuanced human.
reACTIONary
(6,902 posts).... I learned a new term... ANI.
jfz9580m
(16,357 posts)I am eagerly waiting for this book I just ordered (no I have no tie ins! I post stuff I like so often I sound like an adbot myself ;-/.
I am not an influencer just a hater)
https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/tech-billionaires-adam-becker-1235381649/
Its not that there arent a few intelligent scientists at places like Stanford, MIT etc, but at this point I think they have and are letting down the rest of science and scientists, by letting these tech guys and defence contracting get away with ignoring a lot of what were implicit assumptions in the scientific contract with society and there will be no reconciliation with (mediocre and failed) scientists like me they have pissed off.
I myself scoff at conspiratorial trash like lab leak!. But not at subservience to those creeps at Google and Palantir. Not the MTG batshit crazy version, but what Becker etc point out.
Real scientists should have checked these self-serving, mercenary morons and they didnt.
I do not consider them colleagues anymore.
reACTIONary
(6,902 posts)..... I'm partial to being skeptical of the tech-bro bumper sticker elevator pitches that seem to have replaced honest inquiry and genuine insight.
reACTIONary
(6,902 posts)..... highlighted, here is a paywall free review of More Everything Forever: AI Overlords, Space Empires, and Silicon Valleys Crusade to Control the Fate of Humanity
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/23/books/review/more-everything-forever-adam-becker.html?unlocked_article_code=1.7E8.H09N.X3ndyC1jhKkc&smid=url-share
Go to Mars, Never Die and Other Big Tech Pipe Dreams: In More Everything Forever, the science journalist Adam Becker subjects Silicon Valleys ideology of technological salvation to critical scrutiny.