General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMaddowBlog-The top 10 problems with Trump's bailout for U.S. farmers
At first blush, theres a lot to like about the motivation behind the effort. But just below the surface, the policy suffers from some serious flaws.
The top 10 problems with Trumpâs bailout for U.S. farmers - MS NOW
— (@oc88.bsky.social) 2025-12-09T16:07:34.599Z
apple.news/AKfRqItrzRPu...
https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/the-top-10-problems-with-trumps-bailout-for-u-s-farmers
President Trump rolled out a $12 billion bailout for struggling farmers on Monday as he looks to shore up the finances of some of his most loyal supporters whose financial fortunes have been hurt by his trade war. The payments to the farmers will be made by the end of February. The Trump administration will initially distribute $11 billion and is reserving another $1 billion to support growers of fruits and vegetables as needed.
...But just below the surface, the Republican administrations policy suffers from some serious flaws. In fact, I made a top 10 list to highlight the problems with the White Houses initiative.
10. These guys have an awful track record. The last time Trump announced a $12 billion bailout for American farmers, it was during his first term. The policy fell far short, and farming bankruptcies climbed, even before the pandemic.
9. Trump is trying to misuse tariff revenue. At Mondays rollout of the new policy, the president said the $12 billion bailout would be financed through revenue generated by his trade tariffs. But thats not how any of this is supposed to work: Trump was effectively pitching the idea that he wants to help one group of Americans (farmers) by imposing taxes on a larger group of Americans (consumers and business owners), while pretending that foreigners are paying those costs.
8. Trump is wrong about the source of the money. Trump claimed that the $12 billion bailout would be financed through revenue generated by his trade tariffs, but that isnt true......
3. The policy is rooted in partisan and electoral considerations. The president didnt even try to unveil the bailout in a politically neutral way, declaring at a White House event that he considers this a priority because the farmers like me, because you know, based on voting trends. Left unsaid is what he wouldve done if the industry were struggling and he was under the impression that farmers didnt like him.
2. Who else will get a bailout? If the White House is prepared to offer government assistance to one sector of the economy hurt by Trumps agenda, administration officials should probably keep their checkbook handy, because the line of others wholl also need a bailout wont be short.
1. Trumps trying to address a problem he created. The bailout, for all intents and purposes, is an admission of guilt: The Republican administrations agenda is hurting his own countrys agricultural industry, thus the need for a bailout.
cbabe
(6,076 posts)Heres why Black farmers likely wont see benefits of Trumps $12B farmers relief
John Boyd, president and founder of the National Black Farmers Association, also decried the Trump White House not inviting Black farmers to Monday's roundtable.
By GERREN KEITH GAYNOR
DEC 9, 2025
While farmers welcome the economic relief, Black farmers, none of whom were invited to the White Houses Monday roundtable, are likely to see little of the benefits due to cultural and historical barriers.
Thats not going to help farmers like myself, who need help now. And many Black farmers arent going to get this, John Boyd, founder and president of the National Black Farmers Association, told theGrio after Mondays announcement. This stuff is really more money for large-scale white farmers, point blank, and Black farmers aint gonna get a dime its not targeted for us in the first place.
Boyd, who represents 150,000 Black farmers nationwide, explained that, due to institutional barriers and cultural mistrust Black farmers have of the federal government as a result of decades of racial discrimination, most Black farmers do not report their acreage to the USDA, which is part of the requirement to receive the latest $12 billion relief.
more
LetMyPeopleVote
(173,911 posts)From the article posted above
Attilatheblond
(8,086 posts)CrispyQ
(40,565 posts)It will work too. A number of farmers will still vote republican. Some journalist (Rolling Stone?) who went to farm country during the first term tariffs, interviewed farmers & they were pissed! The reporter reminded them of a dem bill that had passed during Obama's time & they all agreed it was a good bill but they also agreed they'd never vote for a dem. If we're lucky they'll stay home.
suegeo
(3,096 posts)According to the following article, the money is coming from the Ag Dept's Commodity Credit Corporation. Which my tax dollars fund.
And not from tariffs, which I guess convicted felon and his gangsters are pocketing.
https://iowacapitaldispatch.com/2025/12/08/repub/trump-to-send-12-billion-in-one-time-payments-to-farmers-to-offset-ag-losses/
U.S. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins, though, told reporters following the event that the money came from the departments Commodity Credit Corporation, which is funded through regular appropriations from Congress, according to a White House pool report.
I typed in a big search for the source of money for farm bailouts. It returned the propaganda/lies spewed by the convicted felon "It is coming from tariffs." This is one way the fascist bullshit lies spread.
No truth from the GOP. Will any of the republican assholes correct that bullshit narrative? Of course not.