Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(179,870 posts)
Wed Dec 10, 2025, 02:23 PM Dec 2025

MaddowBlog-In prior remarks, Hegseth and Bondi also said troops must disobey illegal orders

If the administration intends to investigate Democratic veterans in Congress, it should prepare equal treatment for members of the White House Cabinet.

In prior remarks, Hegseth and Bondi also said troops must disobey illegal orders - MS NOW

apple.news/AtPlYxgM_Q1S...

(@oc88.bsky.social) 2025-12-09T17:49:00.527Z

https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/in-prior-remarks-hegseth-and-bondi-also-said-troops-must-disobey-illegal-orders

CNN reported last week, for example, that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who’s helped advance the partisan offensive against the Democratic veterans, delivered remarks in 2016 explaining that U.S. military personnel “won’t follow unlawful orders from their commander in chief” and described the refusal of illegal commands as a part of the military’s ethos and standards.

CNN also found that, as Election Day 2016 drew closer, the former Fox News host told viewers that service members are “not going to follow illegal orders.”

That is to say, eight years ago, the future Pentagon chief delivered the same message he and Trump are now condemning.

Evidently, Hegseth is not alone. The New York Times reported:

Pam Bondi, the attorney general, said the same thing as the [Democratic] lawmakers last year in a friend-of-the-court brief in the Supreme Court as a lawyer for the America First Policy Institute, a conservative think tank that represented three former military leaders.


In the legal brief, which is available online through the high court’s website, Bondi wrote, “Military officers are required not to carry out unlawful orders.” The Florida Republican added, “The military would not carry out a patently unlawful order from the president to kill nonmilitary targets. Indeed, service members are required not to do so.”

I’m going to go out on a limb and say that the Trump administration won’t launch sedition investigations into the incumbent president’s defense secretary and attorney general, but if officials continue to pursue Democratic veterans in Congress, they should probably prepare an answer to a straightforward question: “Why aren’t you also pursuing cases against the president’s defense secretary and attorney general?”
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
MaddowBlog-In prior remarks, Hegseth and Bondi also said troops must disobey illegal orders (Original Post) LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2025 OP
Hegseth and Bondi are talking about orders given by Democrats. Turbineguy Dec 2025 #1
Fuck Off PEDO Appeasers Bondi, Hegs, and the Cha Dec 2025 #2
Okay, if it's an action that can help you, you can refuse... haele Dec 2025 #3

haele

(15,404 posts)
3. Okay, if it's an action that can help you, you can refuse...
Wed Dec 10, 2025, 05:38 PM
Dec 2025

Like getting a vaccine, or having to provide something healthy to eat, or carrying enough water for your squad when out on exercise...you can disobey those orders.

But an action that causes needless, illegal death and injury. or otherwise wastes taxpayer money - well, no - you can't disobey those orders.

(Added on edit just in case)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»MaddowBlog-In prior remar...