You Tube used to be a good source for original news...

[kentuck]

It has become unbearable.

They will say and do anything to get a click. They pretend their story was put up in the last hour and when you click on it, you realize the story is about 6 months old or older. They create headlines to get your attention and their reports have nothing at all to do with their headlines. They tell the same story over and over and over, hoping someone will click on their bait. They just change their headline.

Some of them, such as Ben Meiselas, will report on Donald Trump a dozen times per day and pretend that he has something new to say. He will talk about Trump "decaying" hands and how he is dying right in front of us. He wants 6 million subscribers.

It is getting more difficult to find good news reports on You Tube.

You Tube used to be a good source but they are doing great damage to the dissemination of information, in my opinion. Perhaps it is just me, but they are becoming unwatchable.

[bucolic_frolic]

1. Agree, a lot of retreads even from 10 years ago, and the new AI impersonations

are proliferating fast. YouTube should taken them down, they use the name, visible likeness, AI voice .... Rachel, BTC but these two have nothing to do with them. They are really Fake News! Ironic.

[kentuck]

4. YouTube is the worst for AI impersonators!

And most of them are not identified. Some will note that they have "altered or synthetic content". But it is a real problem as far as getting accurate information from trusted sources.

[enid602]

9. AI impersonations

There’s one program that features Robert De Niro, but he’s speaking with Joe Biden’s voice.

[sakabatou]

2. I don't use YT for news.

I only go there for entertainment.

[kentuck]

5. I use YT for music and sports a lot...

But, I used to get really good up-to-date news reports also. But that has become a cesspool.

[Boomerproud]

7. You took the word right out of my mouth.

CESSPOOL

[FarPoint]

3. I have notice this as well...

Glad you validated my concerns ...

[Tasmanian Devil]

6. My "nuclear" option

This might not work for you, but I turned off watch-history on YouTube a couple years ago and subscribe to just a few high-quality channels that I really like.

So when I go there I get a mostly blank page until I hit "Subscriptions" and see what's new in the channels I've pre-approved.

Works great. No algorithm trying to get me to watch anything. Just videos from the creators I like.

It still shows list of "suggestions" based on the video I'm currently watching, but that's easy enough to ignore.

To turn off watch history (from the YouTube page):
- click your profile icon
- click 'Your data in YouTube'
- scroll to "YouTube controls" and turn off history and search history

Side effects: you can't view your view history. Bookmark or save in watch-later anything you want to come back to.

Hope this helps!

[flvegan]

8. Worse even, it gets posted here. Oftentimes, without comment.

Like the arms of a clout chasing octopus, feels like sometimes.

[PatSeg]

18. That is really irritating

I rarely ever click on a YouTube video. I would really prefer to read whatever the story is. And as been mentioned, the headlines are often misleading and/or the stories are old news.

[snot]

10. Alternatives:

Try Consortium News, nakedcapitalism.com, or Chris Hedges' Substack.

[Dave says]

11. For me, the sharp decline started about 6 months ago

I used to access a pretty good stream of videos on everything from quantum physics to refutations of Trumponomics. Now it’s 40% AI slop; rightwingers for another 20%; sports, which I have no interest in whatsoever, for another 20%; shorts from the Sopranos and Breaking Bad for another 15%; leaving 5% for things I’m interested in watching. Not once have I watched a Joe Rogan video, so why does he appear so regularly in my stream?

I dimly recall being asked if YouTube can keep track of what I watch. I said no. After that, the decline hit full force.

[OldBaldy1701E]

12. It isn't just you.

The entire platform is now solely there only for profit.

It did not used to be like this, but you know what happens when you wave money in front of a modern human being.

[mdbl]

13. The clickbait titles have gotten out of hand.

Even credible channels are using them to attract viewers. Some of them even admit that.

[GreatGazoo]

14. Very few YouTube channels are fact-bound

I look directly at state-sponsored and approved news (propaganda). They all have their own spin on "why" but taken together they will confirm "what happened": CNBC, NYTimes, RT, Haaretz, PressTV, DW, ABC (Australia). They all spin but they at least put more facts into it than YouTube does and they write at a higher level. You can get the facts quickly and ignore the narratives.

I also follow commodity prices which will move before news comes out. Oil dropped on Wednesday meaning that either the Ukraine war is almost over or bombing Nigeria and seizing two Venezuelan tankers was not enough to boost prices, or both. Either way they will ramp up regime change in one of those major oil producers. If oil pops over $70 then it may mean the Iran war is cued up again.

YouTube gets news last. It is a bunch of guys who "react" or comment on "news" that isn't vetted or fact-bound.

[FiveFifteen]

15. It doesn't help here, either...

… when members here pollute the threads with the same clickbait trash. We need to maintain critical thinking standards and pause before posting without asking “what’s the benefit and who is benefitting” from such clips.

I’ve used this community as a sober news aggregator since 2004, after Kerry’s loss, when I realized what a clickbait doom spiral of a wasteland HuffPost and Daily Kos had become. Stepping back from relentless triggering was the best thing for my political and personal sanity.

Now, more than ever, we need DemUnderground to remain a bulwark against lib/progressive fight or flight sensationalism that just exhausts and distracts us from real work and achieving real results.

[NowsTheTime]

16. I agree, but note how much we use it...however we should advocate for required disclaimers on non original sites & posts

[iemanja]

17. Meiselas is bad in that way

But Pod Save America and the Bulwark are better.