I would like to hear someone

[Dan]

Ask Trump directly - ‘Would you explain to the American people, how as President, you have made 3 billion dollars - while not violating the Emoluments Clause’?

During some event where there is a national audience.

[usonian]

1. Law without prosecution is merely a suggestion.

[mdbl]

7. "Law without prosecution is merely a suggestion

That is so true. The increase in the administration's lawlessness is only eclipsed by the completely complicit or incompetence of the GOP Congress. The laws exist and they don't care if they are followed, unless it's a poor person they can put in jail.

[CousinIT]

2. No media have the spine to ask him that. n/t

[Captain Zero]

3. Neither does ANYONE else. IMHO.

Not even the Dems in Congress. Not in either of the two first term impeachments.

Why not? Seems easily provable to me.
But you won't hear the word.
I think we would hear evidence about Trump ordering Epstein's murder before we heard evidence/charges of emoluments.

#Emoluments

[Wounded Bear]

4. Sadly, the USSC kind of said emoluments are not a problem...nt

[KPN]

11. Covering their own ass on this gravy train ride.

[LoisB]

5. That won't happen with this crop of "journalists".

[PatSeg]

6. Well, there wouldn't be a satisfying answer

and he would probably insult the journalist as well.

[Marie Marie]

8. His answer: I don't know anything about it - my sons are running things. Look, SQUIRREL!

[PatSeg]

9. Ha, ha, sounds about right

Then of course, he'd have to call the person a bad journalist who represents a fake news outlet. A very strange man getting stranger each day.

[MadameButterfly]

16. Frontotemporal dementnia

on top of malignant narcissicism

[electric_blue68]

13. But it still should be asked because....

1) because it's important.
2) At least it's on record that he'll either lie, evade, or deny it.

[PatSeg]

14. Yes, absolutely

Any interactions with the man will be part of history. It is important that everything is documented in detail as a warning for future generations.

[KPN]

10. Perfect!

[leftieNanner]

12. He would say

"You are a nasty reporter."

He doesn't answer those questions.

[JustABozoOnThisBus]

15. "Emoluments" is a Democrat hoax, a scam.

I don't make much money. My sons, however, who are not overly involved in government, run some businesses. I think maybe they brought me some diet Coke, I don't remember. They might have made some money.

And Kushner, I think I met him, he runs some funds that are maybe doing ok.

[JMCKUSICK]

17. I'm sorry to disagree Dan,

I feel like all of our wires have been crossed by trump. We have this part of us that is honest and innocent to the core, and that part keeps believing that he will accidentally wake up one day and I don't know what.

He is a pathological liar, a narcissist and a psychopath. Any of those diagnosed would eliminate believing anything he says, but all three? Even in his mental health issues we are overwhelmed by how staggering it is.

He has no shame, no conscience, no soul.

[ABC123Easy]

18. He wouldn't

Have any idea what it is. Might as well ask a cow about it.

[ProudProgressiveNow]

19. They all know they will be banned! nt