Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Deadline Legal Blog-The brutality of El Salvador's CECOT prison isn't lost on judges holding the Trump administration ac
A “60 Minutes” segment on the notorious prison was pulled from airing under Bari Weiss. The prison has featured in recent high-profile cases exposing the administration’s actions.
https://www.ms.now/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/bari-weiss-60-minutes-cecot-prison-judges-abrego
One of those cases is the ongoing legal saga of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, whom the administration illegally sent to El Salvador and then resisted his court-ordered return until it finally relented in June. Another is a judge’s ongoing effort to pursue a contempt inquiry into the administration’s violation of his order to halt flights that led to the notorious prison.
In Abrego’s case, in which the administration is still trying to deport him, U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis ordered his release from immigration custody earlier this month. Recounting the history of his case, the Obama-appointed judge in Maryland wrote that Abrego was “forcibly expelled” to El Salvador along with others who were detained at CECOT and “systematically beaten and tortured.”
In the second case, U.S. District Judge James Boasberg wrote that his contempt inquiry “is not some academic exercise.” The Obama-appointed judge in Washington, D.C., observed that more than 100 men were “spirited out of this country without a hearing and placed in a high-security prison in El Salvador, where many suffered abuse and possible torture, despite this Court’s order that they should not be disembarked.”
Both judicial writings cited a Human Rights Watch report titled “‘You Have Arrived in Hell’: Torture and Other Abuses Against Venezuelans in El Salvador’s Mega Prison.” The report’s title is a quote attributed to the prison’s director by a detainee. The report detailed alleged abuses and inhumane conditions for people held in CECOT without legal basis.
In Boasberg’s contempt inquiry, an appeals court panel with two Trump-appointed judges in the majority intervened this month to halt it. Before the panel intervened, Boasberg was poised to take testimony from a Department of Justice whistleblower and a current DOJ lawyer to shed light on the matter.
Somewhat like Weiss’ statement about pulling the CECOT segment, the D.C. appellate panel said not to read too much into the temporary postponement — that the panel just needed more time to consider the administration’s appeal. Whatever final decisions are reached by Weiss and the panel in their respective situations, both moves have the effect of keeping potentially damning information about the administration’s policies from the public — while emphasizing the importance of the information being kept hidden.
In Abrego’s case, in which the administration is still trying to deport him, U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis ordered his release from immigration custody earlier this month. Recounting the history of his case, the Obama-appointed judge in Maryland wrote that Abrego was “forcibly expelled” to El Salvador along with others who were detained at CECOT and “systematically beaten and tortured.”
In the second case, U.S. District Judge James Boasberg wrote that his contempt inquiry “is not some academic exercise.” The Obama-appointed judge in Washington, D.C., observed that more than 100 men were “spirited out of this country without a hearing and placed in a high-security prison in El Salvador, where many suffered abuse and possible torture, despite this Court’s order that they should not be disembarked.”
Both judicial writings cited a Human Rights Watch report titled “‘You Have Arrived in Hell’: Torture and Other Abuses Against Venezuelans in El Salvador’s Mega Prison.” The report’s title is a quote attributed to the prison’s director by a detainee. The report detailed alleged abuses and inhumane conditions for people held in CECOT without legal basis.
In Boasberg’s contempt inquiry, an appeals court panel with two Trump-appointed judges in the majority intervened this month to halt it. Before the panel intervened, Boasberg was poised to take testimony from a Department of Justice whistleblower and a current DOJ lawyer to shed light on the matter.
Somewhat like Weiss’ statement about pulling the CECOT segment, the D.C. appellate panel said not to read too much into the temporary postponement — that the panel just needed more time to consider the administration’s appeal. Whatever final decisions are reached by Weiss and the panel in their respective situations, both moves have the effect of keeping potentially damning information about the administration’s policies from the public — while emphasizing the importance of the information being kept hidden.