General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSon of former shah says he is 'uniquely positioned' to lead Iran as he predicts end of regime
Reza Pahlavi, the son of Irans former pro-western monarch, has predicted the countrys Islamic regime will fall and claimed he is uniquely placed to head a successor government.
His bid to assume the leadership of a possible new Iran follows weeks of mass protests that have left thousands dead after being brutally suppressed by security forces.
His credentials are certain to be challenged by other opponents of Ayatollah Ali Khameneis regime, given Pahlavi has not been in Iran since his family fled the country at the beginning of the 1979 Islamic revolution. Many question his level of popular support, even though his name has been chanted at some protests.
Calling on the west to help unseat Khamenei, Irans supreme leader, Pahlavi said on Friday that the regime was nevertheless doomed to collapse with or without such assistance.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jan/16/son-of-former-iranian-monarch-calls-for-targeted-intervention-to-hasten-regimes-collapse
Not a great idea, only marginally better than what they have now.
2naSalit
(100,227 posts)You are not uniquely qualified. Your dad was PLACED in office after WE (the USA) removed the democratically elected president. You have no claim to anything other than your ethnicity on this one, bud.
hlthe2b
(112,937 posts)AZJonnie
(2,918 posts)I'm confused by the connection in this particular case, but do I need to read the whole article to understand?
hlthe2b
(112,937 posts)periodically made overtures about returning when the time was right as though he had the hereditary right to return as Shah. Who knows what the CIA might do (with Trump's blessing). His father's capitulation to US interests was what gave him the nod for decades, but likewise made for a nearly unrivaled corrupt governance (including his own secret police, known as SAVAK, which operated from 1957 until 1979. It was notorious for its extensive surveillance, repression, and torture of political dissidents to maintain the Shah's regime). He was quite friendly to US companies, including Bell Helicopter and what is now AT&T (which had the contract to basically build Iran's national phone system). American workers were able to evacuate before the abrupt overthrow, but I do know many did not get their belongings out. Still, as American employees, they were lucky.. . My parents were among those.
That the majority people of Iran (who were VERY friendly to the West) would turn to an Islamic revolution (albeit many did their best to get out before the ultimate violent overthrow) says quite a lot about just how corrupt things had become. That our own CIA was blinded to how hot the fury had become among the people likewise says a lot.
AZJonnie
(2,918 posts)Well, my stepdad's parents who were pretty much my grandparents. Grandpa Frank worked for Foremost-McKesson over there for many many years, then fled in the late 70's. So yeah, I'm somewhat familiar with the history, I just misinterpreted your post as suggesting it's known that Pahlavi has US support.
I have to say I would not at all be disappointed if the PEOPLE of Iran elect someone as leader who is more friendly to the West, despite the horrors of the asshole Shah's goons, and corruption. At minimum I *really* hope for a secular, democratic government for them (as I do for all the peoples of the world).
As an aside, almost all Iranians I've met throughout life here in the US (it's funny they ALL call themselves "Persian" if you ask), have been friendly, hard-working people. I hope for the best for them
hlthe2b
(112,937 posts)is depressing to me--especially as few (Americans, at least) read/study even American history. And ignoring their millennia of incredible ancient history aside, per my sigline, I see us set up to repeat the mistakes of the recent past. Quite obviously, I and every other American would like to see a return in Iran to good relationships with the US--but given how we are destroying these left and right (north and south) given Trump's treatment of former close friends and allies, I don't see this happening. If anything a dictator that may help oil interests might be installed as he intends to do in Venezuela, but both may be just as likely to see unrest, violence, and coups for the next several decades. Better than Ayatollahs? Yes. But...
I was very fortunate as a teen to get to travel--not only throughout Tehran but to Isfahan and some of the ancient relic-laden areas of Iran. It was amazing. But even I, as a teen, only occasionally visiting could see "things" were clearly changing among Iranian people who had HAD it with Americans (especially those women who would insensitively dress incredibly provocatively, despite the country being conservative, but not overly restrictive at the time). My last trip had me avoiding Iranian women on the street, some who had taken to throwing acid at western women. Not all were in that mode as I had a lot of fun interacting with the local neighborhood cops in Tehran--who retained quite the sense of humor. I mention this only to say the CIA had abandoned their integration of "assets" into the country's culture so they were absolutely blindsided. Even this relatively naive' teen from the US could see it coming.
AZJonnie
(2,918 posts)Can we get that going here in the USA too, please?
lostincalifornia
(4,932 posts)want to govern them?
Jilly_in_VA
(13,869 posts)about who is behind Reza Pahlevi. It could be the CIA, or NATO, or the EU, or he could have very little backing. However, I don't know that he has much in Iran either. I suspect that his politics could be different from those of his father; perhaps he learned something from his father's downfall. Don't be too terribly dismissive of him because of his name; he can't help that. Almost anyone would be preferable to the mullahs.
That said, I think the 1953 CIA coup which toppled the democratically elected premier of Iran, Mohammed Mossadegh, is what I consider one of the Four Big Mistakes of American foreign policy since WWII, the others being Cuba, Vietnam, and Iraq. Does it surprise you that three of these are the direct responsibility of the Dulles brothers? The other is, of course, Darth Cheney's monstrosity.
UTUSN
(77,074 posts)Raine
(31,104 posts)Jacson6
(1,785 posts)Does he think that the Iranians want a new dictatorship where his secret police can abuse and kill the citizens of Iran?
gulliver
(13,738 posts)...he's a prince.
It's not a tough choice. Anything would be better than Ayatollah Dahmer.
Kid Berwyn
(23,191 posts)
Xolodno
(7,317 posts)We installed Western friendly exiled Afghanistan leaders and they went right back to the corrupt practices their parents did. It's what they were taught.
I imagine Pahlavi will probably try to hold on to power for long as he can and set things up so he could grift once out.