Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(79,732 posts)
Mon Jan 19, 2026, 02:45 PM Monday

" If the U. S. were to take Greenland by force, how would that be different than Russia's annexation of Crimea?

Trump's cabinet is as stupid as he is.
And of course, Bessent did NOT answer the question.



The Bulwark @BulwarkOnline

Welker: " If the United States were to take Greenland by force, how would that be different than Russia's annexation of Crimea?"

Bessent: "I believe that the Europeans will understand that this is best for Greenland, best for Europe, and best for the United States."


?s=20





?s=20




1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
" If the U. S. were to take Greenland by force, how would that be different than Russia's annexation of Crimea? (Original Post) riversedge Monday OP
I'm amazed how incredibly bad people like Scott Bessent are. patphil Monday #1

patphil

(8,757 posts)
1. I'm amazed how incredibly bad people like Scott Bessent are.
Mon Jan 19, 2026, 03:29 PM
Monday

Whatever Trump wants, they'll help him get, and justify it as being a good thing for Greenland...for Cuba...for Canada...for Mexico...for Venezuela, and so on.
It would be nice if they actually let the people of those nations decide for themselves, but then he's planning to take away our ability to choose what we think is best for us, so it's actually just an extension of his perversion.

The really perverse part is how many people in the United States are willing to let him do it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»" If the U. S. were...