Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(81,538 posts)
Tue Jan 20, 2026, 12:18 AM Tuesday

Man Acquitted of Shining a Laser at Marine One With Trump Aboard

A Washington man who was accused of aiming a laser pointer at Marine One, the presidential helicopter, as it was leaving the White House in September with President Trump aboard was acquitted on Tuesday, according to court documents.

A jury found the man, Jacob Samuel Winkler, 33, not guilty after just 35 minutes of deliberation, lawyers representing Mr. Winkler said.

Alexis Gardner, a federal public defender for Mr. Winkler, called the case “a clear example of misuse of prosecutorial discretion.”

She said federal resources were spent charging a man “whose alleged weapon was a cat toy key chain,” adding that it was “time and money diverted from real public safety threats.



https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/18/us/politics/marine-laser-trump-acquitted.html

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

AZJonnie

(2,969 posts)
2. Yeah I wouldn't have complained too much if the idiot had to pay a fine and had to do some community service
Tue Jan 20, 2026, 01:03 AM
Tuesday

I don't think there was ever any danger of affecting the pilot by aiming at his eye (too far away, too low-powered, too much high quality glass in the way) but it might've appeared to people in the cockpit to be someone aiming a gun with laser scope at the aircraft so that's where it could maybe create a danger from a panic.

Although from this blurb it doesn't say he aimed it at the cockpit, perhaps it was not, and that's why nothing happened to him?

AZJonnie

(2,969 posts)
8. Did he have his cat there and accidentally aimed at the helicopter when playing with his cat?
Tue Jan 20, 2026, 01:58 AM
Tuesday

Otherwise:

In the U.S. it is explicitly illegal to aim any laser pointer at an aircraft or its flight path, regardless of whether it’s a cheap pet laser or a high‑powered pointer.

Federal law
The relevant statute is 18 U.S.C. § 39A – “Aiming a laser pointer at an aircraft.”

It makes it a federal offense if someone “knowingly aims the beam of a laser pointer at an aircraft in the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States, or at the flight path of such an aircraft.”

The law’s definition of “laser pointer” is broad and covers any device used as a pointer or highlighter, not just powerful green pointers.

Penalties:
Up to 5 years in federal prison and fines under the criminal code (often quoted as up to $250,000).

The FAA can also impose civil penalties up to $11,000 per violation and over $30,000 for multiple incidents.


I don't have a NYT subscription but I'd suppose the reason the jury let the guy walk is that they weren't convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that he did so intentionally

Jack Valentino

(4,486 posts)
7. Anybody piloting Trump ought to find another job....
Tue Jan 20, 2026, 01:36 AM
Tuesday

if they have a patriotic bone in their body----

but yeah I know, times are hard.... be a tough decision to give up a steady job,
and all that....


oh, but wait---- they could start a 'GoFundMe' saying
"I decided I could no longer fly Trump's airplane"
and they would be SET for a year or two!


sadly, they might get more donations if they actually SHOT someone...
like the new millionaire ICE agent who shot the white woman to death in Minnesota...


(Oh wait. Let me think here...)

ForgedCrank

(3,037 posts)
10. Agreed.
Tue Jan 20, 2026, 12:46 PM
Tuesday

Trump or no Trump, he should not have been let off scott free. This is dangerous and the law is serious and exists for good reason.

Jack Valentino

(4,486 posts)
6. Pity he didn't have more than a cat-toy lazer---- but
Tue Jan 20, 2026, 01:31 AM
Tuesday

he was found 'not guilty' so I guess he didn't have even THAT much...


LetMyPeopleVote

(175,724 posts)
9. Expert taken aback by court's 'staggering new rejection' of hand-picked Trump prosecutor
Tue Jan 20, 2026, 12:43 PM
Tuesday

Piro keeps losing

A former federal prosecutor was taken aback on Monday by a jury's "staggering new rebuke" of one of President Donald Trump's hand-picked prosecutors.

Raw Story (@rawstory.com) 2026-01-20T14:10:40Z

https://www.rawstory.com/jeanine-pirro-2674910484

A former federal prosecutor was taken aback on Monday by a jury's "staggering new rebuke" of one of President Donald Trump's hand-picked prosecutors.

Last week, a federal jury acquitted a 33-year-old man named Jacob Winkler after Trump's Department of Justice charged him with crimes stemming from shining a green laser at the presidential helicopter last year. The case was brought by former Fox News host Jeanine Pirro, who currently serves as the U.S. Attorney for Washington, D.C., and the jury deliberated for just 35 minutes, according to reports.

Glenn Kirschner, a former assistant U.S. Attorney in Washington, D.C., described the ruling in a new reaction video for his podcast, "Justice Matters," as a "staggering new rebuke" of Pirro.

"Every hour spent on this case was an hour not spent addressing real threats to our community," Kirschner said.

"But for 12 jurors sitting in a wooden box as the conscience of the community to conclude like that that the prosecutor just completely failed to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt," he added. "It's pretty unusual because we tend not to bring extraordinarily weak cases."

Kirschner said that Pirro's case showed the government "failed miserably in its duty, its responsibility, its obligation to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt."


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Man Acquitted of Shining ...