Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Jack Valentino

(4,636 posts)
2. I suppose he was about as good as any other amateur- artist--- but
Tue Jan 20, 2026, 01:26 AM
Jan 20

presumed himself to be "a better artist than has ever been seen before"---
as a narcissist ...

much like his modern U.S. apprentice regarding any issue that he can think of....



personally, I believe that Trump can SHIT HIS PANTS
"BETTER than anyone has EVER SEEN BEFORE, or ever SMELT!"





(even the little grandchildren cover their nose, but they are more honest than the rest of us!)





BigmanPigman

(54,811 posts)
4. I've seen Hitler's artwork
Tue Jan 20, 2026, 03:45 AM
Jan 20

and his skills were not bad at all. Half of the students in the art schools I attended were a lot worse.

GReedDiamond

(5,527 posts)
5. I have always wondered, were he accepted as an "artist," would he have NOT chosen to be...
Tue Jan 20, 2026, 04:35 AM
Jan 20

...the asshole psycho who started WW2?

And, how would that have altered the world we perceive now, could have been further altered from what it is now?

Thoughts from the Block Universe.

BigmanPigman

(54,811 posts)
6. I don't think the two are really connected.
Tue Jan 20, 2026, 06:22 AM
Jan 20

The term "starving artist" is pretty accurate. The old fine artists were supported by the church and rich people. Everyone knows that artists work several jobs just to get by, like actors. No one goes into the art field to get rich and famous. Hitler was no different.

He had a chip on his shoulder and it likely would have been the same whether or not he got into an art school and was able to support himself through his art or any other profession for that matter.

He was a crazy psychopath whether or not he made it as an artist. Tons of starving artists for hundreds of years didn't turn into mass murderers. He had a serious and separate mental illness. If he were a waiter, a train conductor, a plumber, etc he would still be a psycho. Everyone has some chip on their shoulder but they don't end up destroying cultures and societies due to it.

GReedDiamond

(5,527 posts)
9. Thanks, point taken...
Tue Jan 20, 2026, 01:24 PM
Jan 20

...you are most likely correct.

I tend to think of "art" as a force for good.

But maybe not in this case.

electric_blue68

(26,416 posts)
11. Hmmm.... It's still possible that being accepted as an artist by some prople might have....
Tue Jan 20, 2026, 03:08 PM
Jan 20

occupied his mind enough to keep him,
(and thus The World) back then out of trouble!

edhopper

(37,171 posts)
8. They are not that bad for an amateur
Tue Jan 20, 2026, 08:45 AM
Jan 20

There is a lot of room for improvement, but as a beginner, he is not awful.
And slinking away from politics to paint is the best move he has ever done.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Adolf Hitler was rejected...