Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 06:45 AM Dec 2012

Ben Affleck and Matt Damon know something

Ben makes a movie
Ben wants an Oscar
Seat opens in Mass
Ben yaps alot as does his BFF Matt
Put your money where your mouth is
Ben chickens out, $$$ and Oscars mean more to Ben
Shit, publicity is going to screw my chances, look what happened to Clint
Matt opens his trap
Insults the President at just this time
Ben don't win Oscar
Ben blames the media and continues to whine

Thanks Ben. Thanks Matt. Thanks John.

choice
shit or get off the can
put up or shut up
oh wait, gotta movie to publicize
screw you Ben and Matt.
gonna use my money to see Lincoln again and not Matts new one

Spielberg is going to win the Oscar
Tony is going to win the screenplay
Matt's gonna go home with Ben empty handed

btw, why was Argo allowed to run pre-electoin
But the Binladen movie had to be delayed
The rightwing must have liked the fact that Argo reminded people of Jimmy Carter
(I love Jimmy Carter btw) but they hope the message people got was a bad image
Binladen on the other hand reminded people of how great our President was as compared to their president.

oh, that is why Argo was allowed to run.

Al Franken did the grunt work, the rote work. Al Franken worked his ass off and he is allowed to speak his mind.
Shut the 'uck up Ben and Matt. When push came to shove, you took the ball and the money

feel free to disagree.

45 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ben Affleck and Matt Damon know something (Original Post) graham4anything Dec 2012 OP
It could be possible they are trying for Rex Dec 2012 #1
Clint Eastwood's dead pan performance art routine out of the Nichols/May 1950s was beautiful graham4anything Dec 2012 #3
It is so strange that Clint can direct some great movies Rex Dec 2012 #8
repubs don't get irony/satire/farce/performance art. Clint did a funny skit graham4anything Dec 2012 #9
And now one of RMoneys boys says Rex Dec 2012 #19
I don't understand John2 Dec 2012 #10
Clint is and always has been a Republican. To think otherwise is to believe what you want. Bluenorthwest Dec 2012 #14
Clint is one of those "no rules/no taxes" (for me) Republicans. Walk away Dec 2012 #29
What's the house dressing? GeorgeGist Dec 2012 #2
Umbrella stand taxi plane. n/t Egalitarian Thug Dec 2012 #4
I don't use dressing on my salad. That adds way too many calories. I like it dry. graham4anything Dec 2012 #7
Gasoline n/t Fumesucker Dec 2012 #12
Idiot vinaigrette? nt Guy Whitey Corngood Dec 2012 #23
Muslin SaveAmerica Dec 2012 #45
Can you provide me with one example NWHarkness Dec 2012 #5
He has yapped over the years to want to be in politics. Put up or shut up. graham4anything Dec 2012 #6
So, in a nutshell, no, you can't back up your statement NWHarkness Dec 2012 #15
here's Affleck yapping about the Congo Enrique Dec 2012 #11
First, Ben has an Oscar that he won as a writer at age 24. Golden Globe to go with it. Bluenorthwest Dec 2012 #13
that's pretty sad when you pine for two movie stars to save you. datasuspect Dec 2012 #16
And complain about them when they dont! nt Walk away Dec 2012 #30
Citizens have the right to voice their political opinions w/o running for office. Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #17
Matt Damon is the one with all the rants ecstatic Dec 2012 #18
Clean water in Africa (water.org), the lack of shared sacrifice with regard to Iraq, WorseBeforeBetter Dec 2012 #27
No ecstatic Dec 2012 #39
Oh, right: His unequivocal support of public school teachers, of which his mother is one. WorseBeforeBetter Dec 2012 #43
Matt voted for Obama. mmonk Dec 2012 #20
Firstie, The 1st Amendment Puppy sez "shut the fuck up, Matt & Ben" DisgustipatedinCA Dec 2012 #21
Am I the only one that finds this post uncomprehensible? Matariki Dec 2012 #22
No. It's pretty much a pattern. I personally enjoy the performance art aspect. nt Guy Whitey Corngood Dec 2012 #24
Nope. mmonk Dec 2012 #25
Almost like they were Random Thoughts Fumesucker Dec 2012 #28
is someone due their beer and travel money? wilsonbooks Dec 2012 #33
no but it's not exactly a new phenomenon green for victory Dec 2012 #38
Two things this OP makes me think of ... theKed Dec 2012 #40
Your post is a very large, fly infested lunatica Dec 2012 #26
graham4iambicpentameter WilliamPitt Dec 2012 #31
da dum! graywarrior Dec 2012 #32
I couldn't disagree more with your criticism of Matt and Ben...... Swede Atlanta Dec 2012 #34
Yes, it was delayed. It was suppose to open in October and was pushed back to wide January release graham4anything Dec 2012 #44
Only people who run run for Senate are allowed to voice opinions? Puregonzo1188 Dec 2012 #35
your posts are becoming increasingly unhinged. cali Dec 2012 #36
See Dick run ornotna Dec 2012 #37
you're mad at an actor RudynJack Dec 2012 #41
Ben is the smart one. DevonRex Dec 2012 #42
 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
1. It could be possible they are trying for
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 06:52 AM
Dec 2012

political pariah status, maybe a Ralph Nader level infamy among those in the know.

OTOH; Al Franken is a friken genius and Jimmy Carter is the most unfairly dogged POTUS I've ever seen.

I bet Ben is doing PR for an Oscar run.

 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
3. Clint Eastwood's dead pan performance art routine out of the Nichols/May 1950s was beautiful
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 07:00 AM
Dec 2012

It had me roaring in the aisles

Clint say what you will, he gave up a couple of years and served in public office as Mayor of Carmel.

and Clint sided with us during the Super Bowl with the half time in America.

He earned the right to talk

Ben and Matt, like Bill Bradley, like Russ Feingold whined and whined and took the ball and left the arena. No better than Jim DeMint. or the other quitters.

If you are not in it, how can you win it?(to paraphrase the lotto in NY slogan)

as the song goes
"Some play to win, some play to lose, goodtime Charlie's got the blues"-Danny O'Keefe (c)

winners win
losers whine
too much whine and one gets drunk from the whine
but it makes a great country cry on my bar stool song like

Jim Ed Brown
Pop-a-top

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
8. It is so strange that Clint can direct some great movies
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 07:22 AM
Dec 2012

and still have no idea he was bombing horribly on national television with the chair skit. After a while I started feeling sorry for him.

 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
9. repubs don't get irony/satire/farce/performance art. Clint did a funny skit
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 07:28 AM
Dec 2012

He did more for the democratic cause than any other republican this year

Bob Newhart did this along with May/Nichols in the 1950s/1960s.
Bill Cosby does something like this at times too.

and it went overtime and the Mittman forgot to put his weepy video on because of it


President Obama already had the election clinched 4 years ago, so it mattered little

only the debbie downers, sad sams, cuttenrunners and republicans thought it was even close.
But it never was.
So it was fun to watch Clint. That was the only part of the repub. convention I watched.


it showed what a bad manager/CEO Mitt would be.(so it was a negative)


The 1/2 time in America ad was much better. Reminded people of how Great our President was, saving the automobile industry(it was a positive)

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
19. And now one of RMoneys boys says
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 02:23 PM
Dec 2012

dad never wanted to be POTUS...sigh...can these folks EVER just tell the truth? Clint did a HUGE favor for the democratic party, even if he did not mean to.

That was like a pre-christmas present!

 

John2

(2,730 posts)
10. I don't understand
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 08:41 AM
Dec 2012

Eastwood's politics at all. The man is just crazy to me. He is a womanizer and doesn't care who sleeps with whom. He makes no sense about War either. He is definitely not a Republican but his choice in Mitt Romney was just stupid. If Romney was one of the characters in the Good,Bad and Ugly, He would have easily fit the Bad and Ugly.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
14. Clint is and always has been a Republican. To think otherwise is to believe what you want.
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 09:58 AM
Dec 2012

He has not always been so deeply out of touch with his actor skills, however and that pitiful outing at the RNC did surprise me. Such a total bomb of an attempt at something that even the audience present there did not get. Old Man Shouts at Chair. Sad coda even for a Republican hypocrite like Eastwood.

Walk away

(9,494 posts)
29. Clint is one of those "no rules/no taxes" (for me) Republicans.
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 02:52 PM
Dec 2012

He has always been a staunch supporter of the GOP and served as a republican Mayor of Carmel.

NWHarkness

(3,290 posts)
5. Can you provide me with one example
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 07:11 AM
Dec 2012

of Affleck "yapping a lot" about running for the Senate?

In the only statement I've saw from him on the subject, he said he would engage in conjecture on the subject. It seemed to me like another Beltway circle jerk rumor without any basis in reality.

 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
6. He has yapped over the years to want to be in politics. Put up or shut up.
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 07:15 AM
Dec 2012

flirting is great in dating(assuming the other person isn't being harassed or abused).
Flirting in the media and being a media sensation to self promote is not.

It is not that he yapped about the senate, but that was his chance to put up.
Get in the game or stay out. Don't be wishy washy.

Ashley Judd are you listening? Or just teasing?

and I still am not a fan of his releasing Argo, no matter that it was a positive movie, most people only saw the 1979 bad from it, yet the Binladen movie was forced to be delayed.
Don't understand that.

NWHarkness

(3,290 posts)
15. So, in a nutshell, no, you can't back up your statement
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 11:13 AM
Dec 2012

At least not without twisting it around into something else.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
13. First, Ben has an Oscar that he won as a writer at age 24. Golden Globe to go with it.
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 09:53 AM
Dec 2012

Take a look at that. 1997 he won best screenplay and was instantly the 'flavor of the month' in showbiz. Ben always wanted to direct, but did not actually helm a film until 2007- he waited a decade for his skills to be ready. This should tell a wise observer a few things about his personality.
Neither Ben nor Matt Damon has said they were going to run for any office. Others mention the idea because it makes good sense. One or both of them might in future, and either would get my vote. Neither would take on such a duty lightly, nor unprepared, nor distracted by outside career interests.
I do agree that Lincoln will sweep the Oscars, and as much as I like Ben I admire Kushner, who is my favorite author of plays and whose nomination delights me beyond compare....

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
17. Citizens have the right to voice their political opinions w/o running for office.
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 11:18 AM
Dec 2012

Even when the citizens are movie stars. First Amendment.

They are not politicians (obviously).

Argo was one of the best movies of the year. The events depicted in them go back to prior administrations, not just Carter's.

Argu and the bin Laden movies are totally different movies. I can see why the latter was held back. If you don't see it, there's no point in trying to explain it to you, except to say that Obama wasn't responsible for saving those people in Argo.

Why are you so angry at a couple of actors? Do you think they are something more than what they are? They're just actors. Nothing more, nothing less.

ecstatic

(35,065 posts)
18. Matt Damon is the one with all the rants
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 11:22 AM
Dec 2012

But at the end of the day, he prefers to live a glamorous 1% lifestyle while criticizing others from his high horse. He's still cute though.

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
27. Clean water in Africa (water.org), the lack of shared sacrifice with regard to Iraq,
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 02:48 PM
Dec 2012

calling out the unqualified Yukon Barbie, and fracking ( http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/dec/17/fracking-lobbyists-matt-damon-promised-land )...

Are those the types of rants you're referring to?

If he's on the right, er, left, side of the issues, who fucking cares how much money he makes?

ecstatic

(35,065 posts)
39. No
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 06:53 PM
Dec 2012

These:

"A friend of mine said to me the other day, I thought it was a great line, 'I no longer hope for audacity,'" Damon told Morgan, explaining that he believes the president has "misinterpreted his mandate" and has "doubled down on a lot of things."

...

Damon told GQ in a recent interview that he watched the president’s speech online the following morning. "I have to say, it was pretty funny," the actor admitted. But he wouldn’t give Obama full credit for the quip. "Whoever came up with it, it was a terrific joke," he said.


...

“I’ve talked to a lot of people who worked for Obama at the grassroots level. One of them said to me, ‘Never again. I will never be fooled again by a politician,’ ” Damon told the magazine. “You know, a one-term president with some balls who actually got stuff done would have been, in the long run of the country, much better.”

Damon pointed to the Occupy Wall Street movement as proof that more needs to be done. “If the Democrats think that they didn’t have a mandate—people are literally without any focus or leadership, just wandering out into the streets to yell right now because they are so pissed off,” he said, adding, “Imagine if they had a leader.”


Considering everything he's said, Matt should have the "balls" to be a "leader." He should put his money where his mouth is, as there is an open senate seat in his state and almost zero competition. He could easily beat the GQ repug if he wanted to. I would be glad to see him (or Ben) run, unfair criticisms and all!

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
43. Oh, right: His unequivocal support of public school teachers, of which his mother is one.
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 11:37 PM
Dec 2012

Another legitimate criticism.

I'd love for he or Affleck to run. "Worked" for Ronnie Raygun, why not one of ours? Think it was Affleck who said he wouldn't run until he had enough money NOT to be beholden to anyone. Considering his financial success, that speaks volumes about our corrupt political system.

mmonk

(52,589 posts)
20. Matt voted for Obama.
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 02:30 PM
Dec 2012

But Matt speaks the truth and I stand with him. It's good to see people who get what has happened in America speak their mind. We certainly hear a lot from folks who don't have a clue.

The Bin Laden movie is bad in it's portrayal that torture was instrumental in getting him.

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
21. Firstie, The 1st Amendment Puppy sez "shut the fuck up, Matt & Ben"
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 02:33 PM
Dec 2012

I heard they were fascists anyway.

Matariki

(18,775 posts)
22. Am I the only one that finds this post uncomprehensible?
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 02:37 PM
Dec 2012

It seems to refer to things that only the OP knows what. As if written while inebriated

 

green for victory

(591 posts)
38. no but it's not exactly a new phenomenon
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 06:26 PM
Dec 2012

an inebriated monkey at a typewriter might make more sense at this point.
[IMG][/IMG]

 

Swede Atlanta

(3,596 posts)
34. I couldn't disagree more with your criticism of Matt and Ben......
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 05:16 PM
Dec 2012

Both are outspoken individuals who, for the most part, support progressive causes and the Democratic Party. They can effectively use their celebrity to promote causes and raise awareness of issues (similar to what George Clooney did with respect to Sudan).

They can exercise their 1st Amendment rights to support and champion causes and issues the same as any other citizen. They are under no obligation to run for office but I would not be opposed to seeing either one launch a political career.

There are many, many wealthy progressives from the Kennedys to many of the Hollywood elite. They are wealthy. They don't give away all their wealth to those in need. But they also don't fight to keep their taxes at rock bottom or support stripping the social safety net. They support causes that help people.

I'm not aware there was a tactical decision to delay release of Zero Dark Thirty until after the election. I saw a similar movie on cable television a couple of months ago. I would be curious to know if there was political or other pressure to delay the release of the movie. If we weren't living in a hyper-charged political atmosphere the movie itself might not have even raised any concerns. But I can see where release of the movie anywhere near election could be seen as political grand-standing. But I think Obama communicated the actions he has taken to protect the American people, including taking out BL during the debates.

As for Argo, those events were more than 30 years ago. There were no current political issues or candidates that would have been affected one way or another by its release. I was a young man when the events took place but I did not recall the story about the escaped Americans and their anything-but-conventional escape from Iran. it was a great movie from that perspective.

 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
44. Yes, it was delayed. It was suppose to open in October and was pushed back to wide January release
Mon Dec 31, 2012, 02:04 AM
Dec 2012

with just a few theatres in US (NY LA) to get Oscars for this year.
And the odd thing was, Hurt Locker was a major rightwing movie back at that time

As for Argo, the repubs brought up Obama=Carter 1000s of times during the last few years.
The associate of course is a good association to me, as Jimmy Carter is one of the best presidents, far better than the Bush's and Reagan.
But they were trying to incinuate negatives, not positives
And reminding people of the Iran situation then, after the glorious first 2 1/2 years of the Carter admin, that helped not allow him to win back then.(if the helicopters worked, and the plan succeeded it would have led to the opposite outcome).

Knowing the Hollywood system, it is clearly evident that the BinLaden movie succumbed to pressure and changed their date, and that the repubs were having no problem with the other
meaning that was their intent.

And yes, they can speak out as citizens. As a citizen, I don't have to agree with them.
And as I have relatives in Boston(my sister) it is also evident that in Mass, they are not as liberal as one thinks, and they are rather conservative in many ways, with the Kennedy's not now being the candidate for the Senate seat.

the Kennedy's btw John, Bobby, Teddy all gave their entire lives to public service.
JFK Jr. was about to, had he not let his mother delay his ambitions, and was about to get into political office big time when he died. For all we know, he could have been VP in 2008 had he been alive.
Caroline was ambushed by Gov. Patterson who let the rightwing media talk him out of appointing her to the senate seat of Hillary, and had she been senator, who knows at some point she too might have run for President.
As for some of the other family, two members are now in office, and others have been in and out.
I would say not many families can say the same thing. In fact I can only think of one other family with multiple members having done so and they are on the opposite side of the Kennedy's.


BTW-Mike Bloomberg, liberal democrat from Mass (who switched parties to have an opening to win, but that doesn't stop the fact that he is a liberal from Mass), has said he is giving his entire billions to charities and causes- ALL 100% of his charity are liberal issues. ALL of them.
And he is using billions to fight guns in the street, like no one else has ever done.

Puregonzo1188

(1,948 posts)
35. Only people who run run for Senate are allowed to voice opinions?
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 05:19 PM
Dec 2012

I mean I suppose you're better than the other poster who seemed to imply the military should be running the government, but not by much.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ben Affleck and Matt Damo...