General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump Blurts Out Real Reason for Insurrection Act Threat--and It's Dark
Trump Blurts Out Real Reason for Insurrection Act Threatand Its DarkGreg Sargent/
January 21, 2026
RICH FANTASY LIFE
He thinks it lets him abuse his power however he wants. Its up to the courtsand the American peopleto show him otherwise.
https://newrepublic.com/article/205504/trump-insurrection-act-threat-courts
Do President Trumps advisers actively want him to act like a dictator? At the very least, theres plainly a deep split inside Trumpworld on this question. As deranged as it seems, one faction clearly believes Trump absolutely should project unconstrained tyrannical power, to frighten ordinary voters and institutions into compliance, while another faction thinks acting like a Mad King risks a huge electoral rebuke and, by extension, that normal political patterns still apply.
You can see this tension in Trumps ugly new comments about invoking the Insurrection Act, which would empower him to use the military for domestic law enforcement. Lately hes suggested that he might not invoke it after all. And in an interview flagged by Aaron Rupar, Trump said this again.
Asked if he sees the act as necessary, Trump said: I dont think it is yet. It might be at some point. Trump added that other presidents have invoked it, and said: It does make life a lot easier. You dont go through the court system. Its just a much easier thing to do.
Emphasis added. Trump seems to think invoking the Insurrection Act means hes no longer constrained by the courts. Thats nonsense. Yes, the act would allow him to deploy the military to carry out things that law enforcement (a grotesque misnomer for ICE) is doing in places like Minneapolis amid his immigration crackdown. And given that Trump has already sanctioned extraordinary abuses of powerdetentions of U.S. citizens, warrantless arrests, excessive violence against protesters, including the occasional killingempowering the military to do all this is an unsettling prospect.
SSJVegeta
(2,432 posts)Which in turn results in something dark because stupid shit like this is never supposed to be a reality.
...one would think
Qutzupalotl
(15,685 posts)He acts as though it were true, gets people to accept it, and people just bow and scrape at every step, and give him what he wants. Example: presidential immunity.
The courts can stop him, but often after much damage has been done. Example: the East Wing.
My point is, if he thinks he can do whatever he wants because blah blah Article II, he will try, and that makes him especially dangerous.
groundloop
(13,586 posts)When's the last time there was a new story about tRump's involvement with Epstein? Or the fact that 99% of the legally required release of the "Epstein files" has not happened?
Bluetus
(2,370 posts)the Insurrection Act has only been used 3 times. All three were at the explicit request of Governors. Two were due to instability following weather disasters, and the third was the LA Riots after the Rodney King beating.
To find a case where the President used it without a Governor's request, you have to go back to the 1960s where Eisenhower and Kennedy used it to enforce the federal desegregation laws.
eppur_se_muova
(41,132 posts)just doesn't know what he's doing the overwhelming majority of the time.
He just makes lots of threats, notes which ones get a reaction, and tosses out some new ones. No principles, no policies, no plans, just announcing whatever the Hell he feels like will get him attention on any given day.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,613 posts)My blood about ran cold watching his reaction to Zelenskyy explaining that their constitution puts elections 'on hold' if the country is at war.
trump was pretty amped up about this. Since we don't do that by statute, Lord knows he was going to find something to justify this line of manufactured bullshit.
Venezuela, Greenland, Canada, ICEholes triggering a civil war - he's throwing everything at it, IMO.