General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSqueal
Malcolm X said that he could most accurately measure how good of a job he was doing, based on how loud his enemies would squeal. I kept this in mind as I watched Jack Smith testify today.
We heard the squeals of the republicans on the committee in five minute spasms. They came in sermons of organized lying, for these people have no shame. They are failing human beings. They fear the felon more than the consequences of telling the truth. They have betrayed the oath of office to uphold the Constitution.
The head of this flock of ass clowns is Jim Jordan, who has mastered the art of being the smarmiest congressman since Newt as he spreads lies. The republicans were not able to find a single thing that Mr. Smith that did not follow policy and law. However, there was a moment of humor when it was documented how frightened Jordan was on January 6. Surely, these people play on the junior varsity level of the maga debating team.
Their champion of squelen is, of course, is supposed to be in the Oval Office, promoting well-being in this country. Perhaps, in a sense, he was unaware his first attack on Mr. Smith actually illustrated what the investigations found. A pathetic, shell of a man. He will prove incapable of shutting up tonight.
I like and respect each and every Democrat on the committee. Rep. Crockett and Rep. Raskin rank among my favorites in my lifetime. I heard on MS NOW that there had been an organized plan for the hearing, but that there may have been some disagreements. I don't know if that is true, but I can see how it might be. I thought there were too long of responses to republican attacks.
Republicans ranted, and did not allow Mr. Smith to answer fully. Thus, the number one goal should have been to allow Mr. Smith to speak for most of each Democrat's time. The republican attacks should have been expected I am confident the average DU community member had a pretty good idea. Thus, there are two ways to deal with this. First, a single sentence that exposes the republican's lies, or second, adding a document to the record that exposes them. I'm not second-guessing the Democrats, though, as I was very satisfied.
Saoirse9
(3,933 posts)I hate that Jordan was even allowed to speak. I hate that sleazy mother fucker.
H2O Man
(78,774 posts)that you despise about him are on full display. But it is funny when it is put on the record how scared that boy was one January 6.
calimary
(89,206 posts)This was a formal nationally televised hearing. One would think decorum would dictate being fully dressed. I kept wondering wheres yer jacket, Asswipe?
H2O Man
(78,774 posts)is perfect. While I agree he should have worn a jacket, no matter what he wears he is still an asswipe.
slightlv
(7,498 posts)H2O Man
(78,774 posts)H2O Man
(78,774 posts)It was mentioned that Mr. Smith's second report will be released in February. It is on the stolen documents.
As Saoirse9 can confirm, I had said it would either be released or "leaks" would begin, weeks ago. However, I was under the impression it would be the report around May, or leaks in the early fall. Injustice Cannon does not have full control of all copies of the damning information in them.
Klarkashton
(4,817 posts)The republicans were praising Oliver North.
This is a death match between common sense decency and billionaires. I have little faith anymore.
H2O Man
(78,774 posts)remember republicans pretending they though Nixon was an honest man. When Oliver North wore his uniform while testifying, republicans thought he must be honest.
The corporate/billionaire party is relatively small, but they are the most powerful.
Thanks!
ancianita
(43,060 posts)Right before Jordan gaveled to adjourn.
H2O Man
(78,774 posts)In a healthy society, Jamie Raskin would be president. I have such a high opinion of him. He knows the deal, and speaks the truth.
The first phone call I got after Jordan did adjourn was an associate who asked, "Did you see Raskin play Jordan at the end?" Indeed, I did!
damifino10
(155 posts)As soon as Smith got to the core of the question, the gOpeeee assholes would not let him him finish his answers.
I would hate to be a member of the gOp asshole's families. They can't ALL believe the shit their family member
is putting forth.
H2O Man
(78,774 posts)All they had were insults.
I'd have favored something that Malcolm taught. Place a clean, cold glass of water next to a filthy glass of sludge, and allow thisty people to decide which one they want to drink. The republicans were absolutely the sludge. Jack Smith, when allowed to talk, delivered the clean message.
Martin Eden
(15,394 posts)He said that early in the hearings, some Republicans on the panel sought to defend Nixon, but as the facts were revealed, their questions were more aimed at understanding the truth of what actually happened.
Now, of course, their aim is to shoot the messenger. Jack Smith is a straight shooter who professionally deals in facts and law. When the facts and the law threaten Dear Felon, their mission is to avoid facts, blow smoke, and engage in character assassination.
Their objective is to influence the court of public opinion, because they would lose in a legitimate court of law. Which, of course, does not stop The Felon from directing his stooge Pam Bondi from pursuing criminal indictments against Jack Smith -- no basis in facts being necessary. His motive is to punish and send a message to anyone else who might be inclined to follow the dictates of the law in challenging this dictatorial regime.
Of course, Mr. Smith went to Washington anyway. He clearly stated he will not be intimidated, and would do it again.