Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Arazi

(8,887 posts)
Sat Jan 24, 2026, 06:23 PM Jan 24

Compelling analysis that an ICE goon accidentally fired Pretti's gun

Setting off the chain reaction of other shots that killed him. Watch the goon in the grey coat disarm Alex Pretti and accidentally fire it.

That appears to trigger the others to unload their guns into Pretti

https://www.reddit.com/r/ICE_Watch/s/ZeXSgsTGkB

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Ocelot II

(130,568 posts)
1. Didn't the gun have a safety? If Pretti had it holstered wouldn't the safety have been on?
Sat Jan 24, 2026, 06:24 PM
Jan 24

Arazi

(8,887 posts)
2. That Sig model is NOTORIOUS for accidental firing
Sat Jan 24, 2026, 06:25 PM
Jan 24

There’s loads out there on this flaw

Ocelot II

(130,568 posts)
4. Whether or not the gun fired accidentally, what's obvious is that Pretti never fired the
Sat Jan 24, 2026, 07:00 PM
Jan 24

gun or even threatened ICE with it. Apparently they wrestled him to the ground after he tried to help another observer, then one of the ICE agents saw Pretti's gun (holstered? In his waistband?) and took it. Maybe it discharged accidentally at that point, so what happened to the bullet; did it hit Pretti? I wonder if the state investigators have been able to examine the scene yet. One of the Reddit posters disagrees, and said:

"If the victim's gun was fired by gray coat, we would see gasses leave the muzzle as well as the slide move.
When you slow the video down, you can see the guy with the green jacket and tall black beanie, just behind the guy with gray jacket. You can see his right shoulder rise up as he draws his gun, if you compare this with the footage from the woman in pink jacket's footage, you will see him draw just as gray jacket is turning away and firing the first shot. That is when they all start to back away and he and one other continue firing."

scipan

(3,044 posts)
11. This interpretation is correct. I mean, there's really no room for doubt. Video proof:
Sun Jan 25, 2026, 12:25 AM
Jan 25

Ignore the message, x is possibly trying to squash it. Just click the link.


Boo1

(356 posts)
6. It doesn't look like that to me at all
Sat Jan 24, 2026, 07:18 PM
Jan 24

In the pink lady video, the agent to the left of the agent who reaches down and disarms the victim is clearly the first shooter.

He is turned away from the man, looking at the other person they have on the ground. He turns and pulls his gun as the other agent is already moving back with the SIG in his hand. He moves into the gap left as the disarming agent turns to move away, it's not until he gets into that position and the other guy is turned that the first shot rings out.

Nobody else draws or fires until after that guy had shot 2 or 3 times.

He was in full view of the agent disarming the man
He drew before anyone else, and fired the first shot.

7. My guess is that the disarming officer yelled "gun" and the idiot shooter turned and started shooting.
Sat Jan 24, 2026, 07:34 PM
Jan 24

Boo1

(356 posts)
8. That may be why he turned
Sat Jan 24, 2026, 08:51 PM
Jan 24

But he was also looking straight at the man grab it and take it a away.

9. Absolutely. These are untrained bullies who shoot first
Sat Jan 24, 2026, 09:04 PM
Jan 24

and then run away and get protection from other bullies in the administration. Cowards and bullies from top to bottom in this regime

Boo1

(356 posts)
10. If I were an ICE agent
Sat Jan 24, 2026, 09:58 PM
Jan 24

or ANY federal agent tasked with working with them, I would refuse based on the risk to myself working along side such incompetence.

scipan

(3,044 posts)
12. Not compelling when you watch this other video:
Sun Jan 25, 2026, 12:27 AM
Jan 25

Ignore the message and click on the link (x fuckery).


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Compelling analysis that ...