General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDoes the Bush family condone what is going on the MN?
Their silence is deafening.
Emile
(42,309 posts)malaise
(296,176 posts)Ol Janx Spirit
(1,014 posts)I haven't thought about him in years.
Man I miss the days when misspelling a word was fertile ground for deriding a political figure.
Joinfortmill
(21,183 posts)malaise
(296,176 posts)Liz Cheney hasn't been too loud about it either.
Buckeyeblue
(6,353 posts)Blues Heron
(8,847 posts)Joinfortmill
(21,183 posts)littlemissmartypants
(33,666 posts)Buckeyeblue
(6,353 posts)Besides all that brush that he cleared on the ranch. You wouldn't think there would have been a twig left on the place.
Renew Deal
(85,177 posts)Ritabert
(2,450 posts)Blues Heron
(8,847 posts)malaise
(296,176 posts)Rec
Bettie
(19,707 posts)It doesnt affect them, so it isnt important. Same with other Republicans, it isnt affecting their beloved cash flow, so it doesnt matter.
OldBaldy1701E
(11,164 posts)Now, we are getting somewhere.
Ask yourself... who suffers in the situation we find ourselves in?
Because it won't be those with money. NO ONE in that socioeconomic position is going to be too concerned about what is going on, because they are still making money.
You want things to change? STOP making them money. STOP giving them money. That is how they learn to stop being shits.
Oh, that is too hard for some reason? Well these reasons should have been addressed the moment we realized that they were not going to stop. (For some of us, that realization happened a lot sooner than others (for reasons that make no sense to me, as we were screaming that this was going to happen)... UNTIL you look into who has money and who does not.
Bettie
(19,707 posts)but, there are some things....like food that one has to buy.
It is hard though, especially if you live in a place without many local options, but we can all do our part, small or large in denying them profit.
And soon, it won't be a choice so much as a necessity as prices continue to rise and rise.
OldBaldy1701E
(11,164 posts)I was referring to continuing to make them richer by keeping their factories running. By keeping their offices functioning. By fixing their cars and by cleaning their houses. By doing all the things that make them more wealthy while keeping you in the ditch so that you won't try to take some of their horde.
STOP doing them. This is how you 'get their attention'.
Bettie
(19,707 posts)it's hard to find ways to affect the very wealthy because the own literally everything. They don't even SEE us, we're as important to them as ants on the sidewalk.
A massive general strike would get their attention, but I doubt that we have the numbers do do that....yet.
A big part is that our country is so big with a large population, that it is hard to make a large majority isnt' on board.
No need for an apology, I understand what you were saying...but it is hard to get enough people involved to get their attention, because the "elites" literally don't care if most of us die, as long as they have their beloved money.
MLWR
(1,027 posts)Lonestarblue
(13,486 posts)Laws also need to be changed to restrain both ICE and CBP to prevent their abuses. A new immigration law would be good too.
llmart
(17,624 posts)It isn't any more necessary than "Department of War".
JHB
(38,220 posts)Consolidating federal enforcement agencies under one roof was a "Project 2025" goal long before its authors gave it a binding and a name.
llmart
(17,624 posts)I hated the whole concept of it after 9/11. The name "Homeland Security" reeked of nazism to me.
I am almost 77 years old. We lived without a Department of Homeland Security most of my life. Why do we need one now? It was supposed to keep us "safe". You know what would keep us safe? Stop being the world's bully.
Clouds Passing
(7,942 posts)PatSeg
(53,214 posts)Eventually he caved to pressure from members of congress. For five minutes he was almost on the right side of history.
Surprisingly, it was Joe Lieberman who initially 'proposed it, White House conservatives reportedly balked because it would mean a vast new federal bureaucracy. But President Bush reportedly decided it was politically expedient to sign the bill. So Congress and the White House essentially wrote a blank check one of many that spawned a post-9/11 national security state that threatened to put the country on a permanent war-time footing and wrongly treated the homeland as if it was under continuous, existential threat.'
https://www.aclu.org/news/civil-liberties/20-years-later-its-time-to-overhaul-the-department-of-homeland-security
I'd remembered that Bush opposed DHS at first, but I didn't remember that Lieberman had proposed it. It didn't take long before republicans got onboard and politicized 9/11 to their own benefit. I remember all the military grade armored vehicles and weapons sent to police departments all over the country. It was both bizarre and frightening; now we can see all our worst fears come true.
There's more at the link that was very interesting.
Joinfortmill
(21,183 posts)PatSeg
(53,214 posts)To think, he almost became vice president.
Looking back, he was on the wrong side of a whole lot of issues.
MustLoveBeagles
(16,432 posts)Al Gore could've done better.
PatSeg
(53,214 posts)Lieberman ended up being a huge disappointment to Democrats, especially when he campaigned for McCain and Palin in 2008.
Then later he held the ACA hostage and was instrumental in getting rid of the public option. Apparently he had taken over $1 million in campaign contributions from the medical insurance industry during his senate career. Lieberman's wife, Hadassah, worked for a major lobbying firm as its specialist on health and pharmaceuticals. She previously worked at drug companies such as Pfizer and Hoffmann-La Roche.
He became an Independent and often voted with republicans after that.
UpInArms
(55,000 posts)I have never gotten over my absolute disgust of the rights they have trampled
Ol Janx Spirit
(1,014 posts)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Prize#:~:text=The%20Nobel%20Prizes%20are%20awards,in%20memory%20of%20Alfred%20Nobel.
Speaking out on this wouldn't repair GW's legacy, but it wouldn't hurt.
But Bush is clearly a coward--too afraid to cut against his big-oil buddies and the MAGA crazies to come out in defense of the America that is slipping away from us even though it made him very wealthy.
littlemissmartypants
(33,666 posts)mysteryowl
(9,315 posts)I understand your point about the silence.
BluesRunTheGame
(1,964 posts)Not sure why Id want to remember them today.
I dont think most conservatives these days look to them for guidance.
On edit:
Heres George with one of his oil paintings. Its called Lap Dog is my Spirit Animal.

littlemissmartypants
(33,666 posts)rickford66
(6,065 posts)angrychair
(12,291 posts)Their silence is your answer.
livetohike
(24,287 posts)issue. As a former President, Bush needs to make a statement, unless he condones this.
cayugafalls
(5,960 posts)The BFEE is most likely cheering
Johonny
(26,199 posts)And Bush has spoken to members of congress. But the opposition is completely behind closed doors. All GOPers fear their insane voting base, who demand positions that are awful. Hence the complete silence. MTG shows how quick you go from star to local bar speaking out.
Ritabert
(2,450 posts)....that achieved nothing except spike the national debt setting us up for our current mess.
choie
(6,908 posts)samsingh
(18,426 posts)the 2000 election and corruption of the supreme court paved the way for trump
Martin Eden
(15,634 posts)He should be grateful that The Felon replaced him as the worst president ever.
Blue Full Moon
(3,497 posts)malaise
(296,176 posts)That is all
Norrrm
(5,069 posts)In 1995, President George H.W. Bush resigned from the NRA after Executive VP Wayne LaPierre described federal agents as "jack-booted thugs" in a fundraising letter. Calling the remark a "scurrilous" attack on law enforcement, Bush stated it offended him and, as a former president, he could not be associated with such rhetoric.
bagimin
(1,703 posts)Clouds Passing
(7,942 posts)mainer
(12,555 posts)Will their coming out in support of Democrats help us or hurt us? Maybe the Dems would rather the Bushes keep their mouths shut?
MacKasey
(1,519 posts)I keep thinking all the ex-presidents should speak it with one voice in condemning the violence being done by ICE.
I thought it would have been the right thing for George W to condemn the violence on January 6th 2021 and it would have made it easier for the Republicans to impeach and convict Trump and this stuff will not be happening now
But then you look what happened to Liz Cheney
maliaSmith
(201 posts)All former presidents of both parties should be speaking up FORCEFULLY against what Trump and his brown shirted goons are doing in our country. It's disgusting that they aren't. Shame on all of them.
Kid Berwyn
(24,431 posts)https://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x2748315
malaise
(296,176 posts)at home
Kid Berwyn
(24,431 posts)What Kissinger said:
"I don't see why we need to stand by and watch a country go communist due to the irresponsibility of its people. The issues are much too important for the Chilean voters to be left to decide for themselves."
I remember DU when we had a whole lotta experts on the Bush-NAZI connections.
hatrack
(64,907 posts).
FarPoint
(14,773 posts)I think he may of burned out too many brain cells getting high back in his day.... He does what he is told essentially.... Not one for passion about his past jobs...
Escape
(472 posts)Before becoming president, W was a young, brash, cocky idiot who drank and partied a lot.
I'm sure the Trump blackmail file on him is exhaustive and colossal.
drray23
(8,782 posts)The republican party has moved way past them. It's now maga all the way and they don't care what the bushes have to say.
Beringia
(5,507 posts)Polybius
(21,905 posts)He doesn't wanna get involved in anything political, and I respect his decision.
Bettie
(19,707 posts)about it at all.
They have the money to live in private estates where they are insulated from everything.
They will pretend to care if one of them tries to run for office again, but it will be 100% fake.
Cherrycheeks
(326 posts)Probably laughing his ass off.
