Who decided that they could invade somebody's home

[malaise]

without a warrant

Good question

[Klarkashton]

1. Miller? Noem? take your pick actually.

[malaise]

5. She should be gone before sundown

Effin LIAR

[Ars Longa]

7. Yes! But the Power is Trumps. the Buck stops with him. PERIOD!!

[SamKnause]

3. Was it the 'Supreme Court' ???

Specifically Kavanaugh ???

[bucolic_frolic]

4. People who think the Constitution is a regulatory structure

Bondi.

[Farmer-Rick]

6. They use what they call administrative warrants

Warrants Not signed by a judge. Just sign by some Joe who works for ICE.

Administrative warrants (Forms I-200/I-205) for immigration arrests have been used for decades before ICE current policies, authorized by federal immigration law and the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) before 2003. The Supreme Court recognized these administrative warrants in Abel v. United States (1960), noting they have long "sanction[ed]" deportation arrests.

Historically, while these warrants authorized arrests, they did not traditionally permit officers to enter private homes without consent, a limitation that recent 2026 ICE memo signed by ICE Director Todd Lyons change. This change has not been reviewed by the courts. Nor are these administrative warrants considered valid in entering an American citizen's home.

Legal twists that any good Nazi would love.

[malaise]

8. Aren't they. Illegal? n/t

[Farmer-Rick]

9. Yes and no

They are illegal if an agent is using them to gain access to a citizens and/or noncitizens home. Using them to enter a noncitizen's home is very iffy. The dancing Supremes have never ruled on allowing ICE to use them for invading homes no matter the citizenship of the owners or tenants.

They are legal if they are used to deport a person who has staid past their Visa date.

[malaise]

11. Thanks

Rec

[surrealAmerican]

10. It's been a long time since the fourth amendment has actually been ...

... enforced in this country.

Authoritarians hate that kind of thing.