General Discussion

Coldwater

(1,286 posts) Tue Jan 27, 2026, 03:38 PM Jan 27

TikTok blocks Epstein mentions and anti-Trump videos

Link

https://www.independent.co.uk/bulletin/culture/titkok-trump-epstein-censorship-videos-b2908539.html

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

TikTok blocks Epstein mentions and anti-Trump videos (Original Post) Coldwater Jan 27 OP

SO PEOPLE SHOULD STOP USING IT! Scrivener7 Jan 27 #1

They are going to lose a whole lot of members................... Lovie777 Jan 27 #2

It is very hard to post anything negative on doc03 Jan 27 #3

Call it what it is: TrumpTok. He & the GOP pretty much own the internet. RedWhiteBlueIsRacist Jan 27 #4

Over the past two days I am getting nothing but sports feeds FHRRK Jan 27 #5

Censorship per governmental pressure or preference snot Jan 28 #6

Scrivener7

(59,531 posts)

1. SO PEOPLE SHOULD STOP USING IT!

Reply to Coldwater (Original post)

Tue Jan 27, 2026, 03:39 PM

Jan 27

Lovie777

(23,004 posts)

2. They are going to lose a whole lot of members...................

Reply to Coldwater (Original post)

Tue Jan 27, 2026, 03:40 PM

Jan 27

doc03

(39,088 posts)

3. It is very hard to post anything negative on

Reply to Coldwater (Original post)

Tue Jan 27, 2026, 04:41 PM

Jan 27

Yahoo. If you quote Trump word for word they call it inoporiate language. I tried posting Trump's shit hole countries No. S hole, no. I went for sand hole countries.

RedWhiteBlueIsRacist

(2,042 posts)

4. Call it what it is: TrumpTok. He & the GOP pretty much own the internet.

Reply to Coldwater (Original post)

Tue Jan 27, 2026, 04:45 PM

Jan 27

FHRRK

(1,410 posts)

5. Over the past two days I am getting nothing but sports feeds

Reply to Coldwater (Original post)

Tue Jan 27, 2026, 04:56 PM

Jan 27

Previously, and most importantly, have seen very little content from MN.

Account deleted.

snot

(11,818 posts)

6. Censorship per governmental pressure or preference

Reply to Coldwater (Original post)

Wed Jan 28, 2026, 03:07 PM

Jan 28

should be unConstitutional.

I'm all for free speech, but US governments should not be able to evade the First Amendment by inducing corporations, via negative or positive incentives or measures, to do the censorship for them.

If you hire a hit man to murder someone, you're culpable of murder. The same should be true of Constitutional violations.

Reply to this discussion