Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(135,808 posts)
Wed Jan 28, 2026, 04:26 PM Jan 28

3 months after rapidly scheduled arguments, the Supreme Court has yet to decide on Trump's tariffs

WASHINGTON (AP) — When the Supreme Court granted an unusually quick hearing over President Donald Trump's tariffs, a similarly rapid resolution seemed possible.

After all, Trump's lawyers told the court that speed was of the essence on an issue central to the Republican president's economic agenda. They pointed to a statement from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warning that the “longer a final ruling is delayed, the greater the risk of economic disruption.”

But nearly three months have elapsed since arguments in the closely watched case, and the court isn't scheduled to meet in public for more than three weeks.

No one knows for sure what's going on among the nine justices, several of whom expressed skepticism about the tariffs' legality at arguments in November. But the timeline for deciding the case now looks more or less typical and could reflect the normal back-and-forth that occurs not just in the biggest cases but in almost all the disputes the justices hear.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/three-months-rapidly-scheduled-arguments-050919641.html

Thomas and Alito are doing mental gymnastics trying to justify Trump's ability to unilaterally implement tariffs.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
3 months after rapidly scheduled arguments, the Supreme Court has yet to decide on Trump's tariffs (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jan 28 OP
Probably allowing enough time for Trump to extort enough money so he doesn't expose secrets. chowder66 Jan 28 #1
They are plugging different scenarios into johnnyfins Jan 28 #2
It's like a job negotiation bucolic_frolic Jan 28 #3
I've mentioned before here, that if they cannot rule for TSF, then they can bluestarone Jan 28 #4
You may be right Redleg Jan 28 #5
The Right Wingers are holding out for more brib...I mean tips Johnny2X2X Jan 28 #6
I do suspect that the further misuse of tariffs Frasier Balzov Jan 28 #7

bluestarone

(22,199 posts)
4. I've mentioned before here, that if they cannot rule for TSF, then they can
Wed Jan 28, 2026, 04:33 PM
Jan 28

STALL for TSF. That's the gameplan folks.

Redleg

(6,922 posts)
5. You may be right
Wed Jan 28, 2026, 04:36 PM
Jan 28

Or Alito and Thomas are still working on a theory of how Trump should be able to impose tariffs.

Johnny2X2X

(24,217 posts)
6. The Right Wingers are holding out for more brib...I mean tips
Wed Jan 28, 2026, 04:37 PM
Jan 28

They figure they can juice their donors for an extra 25%.

Frasier Balzov

(5,064 posts)
7. I do suspect that the further misuse of tariffs
Wed Jan 28, 2026, 05:18 PM
Jan 28

to extort European opponents of Trump's Greenland quest set back the publication of that opinion by weeks.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»3 months after rapidly sc...