General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJodi Kantor in the NY Times reports that the Chief Justice requested Court employees sign nondisclosure agreements...
Jodi Kantor in the NY Times reports that the Chief Justice requested Court employees sign nondisclosure agreements in November 2024 - moving to formal contracts requiring silence/confidentiality after Trump was reelected: www.nytimes.com/2026/02/02/u...
— Leah Litman (@leahlitman.bsky.social) 2026-02-02T11:48:06.530Z
dalton99a
(94,855 posts)Clouds Passing
(8,112 posts)Mysterian
(6,580 posts)The six phony justices have perverted the rule of law and betrayed their nation.
spanone
(141,917 posts)travelingthrulife
(5,433 posts)was said to be at at least one of them.
Botany
(77,631 posts)John Roberts is as unAmerican as it gets.
Lovie777
(23,323 posts)what could go wrong?
Theres nothing Roberts could do to any Justice refusing to sign, hope that at least the three liberals refused.
Mysterian
(6,580 posts)hedda_foil
(16,999 posts)SheltieLover
(81,370 posts)travelingthrulife
(5,433 posts)He said he didn't see Thomas do anything but remembered him because it was usually mostly white people there. Not confirmed of course because no one bothered.
hedda_foil
(16,999 posts)BComplex
(9,940 posts)We knew thomas was sick from the start. His confirmation hearings confirmed it.
C_U_L8R
(49,461 posts)The corruption has metastasized. Bring on the morphine.
Ping Tung
(4,370 posts)tavernier
(14,483 posts)Funny how secrets and bodies hate staying buried.
Ping Tung
(4,370 posts)I don't always agree with Lord Acton (or Jefferson) but I usually find them challenging.
Swede
(39,820 posts)Trump can do anything.
Fiendish Thingy
(23,599 posts)The only thing federal employees are bound to keep secret is classified information.
Trump tried to enforce NDAs on his staff during his first term and failed - Omorosa from the apprentice was the most notable example.
MichMan
(17,290 posts)Did not know that.
They convicted that IRS contractor for leaking those thousands of tax returns of wealthy people. So, if he would have been a federal employee, he couldn't have been convicted? Is it the same for Social Security personal info?
radical noodle
(10,667 posts)from releasing tax returns of citizens to the public. That's different than NDAs and can indeed be prosecuted.
MichMan
(17,290 posts)That was the part I wasn't sure was correct
radical noodle
(10,667 posts)would be able to release tax returns, depending on how they acquired them, but IRS employees cannot just by virtue of having access to them through their employment.
For instance, Mary Trump had access to her uncle's tax returns through a legal case and released them. If she'd been a federal employee, she might still have legally released them because of the way she obtained them.
NOTE: Taking a few legal courses does not make me an attorney by any means.
Fiendish Thingy
(23,599 posts)And of course they are liable for any criminal conduct.
But they cant be sued, which is what NDAs typically threaten.
So once they leave federal employment, they can write books about the inside drama in the court without fear of being sued, regardless of Roberts NDAs.
That was my point.
MichMan
(17,290 posts)They don't have absolute immunity from any lawsuits.
Fiendish Thingy
(23,599 posts)Only that it has been established that NDAs are unenforceable against federal employees.