General Discussion

Stargleamer

(2,729 posts) Sat Feb 7, 2026, 08:46 PM Feb 7

an interesting hypothesis on why the word "don't" was redacted in the Epstein files. . .

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

an interesting hypothesis on why the word "don't" was redacted in the Epstein files. . . (Original Post) Stargleamer Feb 7 OP

That's some Sherlock Holmes-level detective work. Impressive. TheRickles Feb 7 #1

Yep. bamagal62 Feb 7 #2

Sure makes sense to me. lamp_shade Feb 7 #3

You'd think those idiots canetoad Feb 7 #4

There should be a law that whoever... Mark.b2 Feb 7 #5

"Dwigt" has entered the chat Orrex Feb 7 #6

Duh JoseBalow Feb 7 #7

Darwin Award nominees, all of them. ms liberty Feb 7 #8

Seriously, is AI doing the redactions? Talitha Feb 8 #9

TheRickles

(3,394 posts)

1. That's some Sherlock Holmes-level detective work. Impressive.

Reply to Stargleamer (Original post)

Sat Feb 7, 2026, 08:48 PM

Feb 7

bamagal62

(4,505 posts)

2. Yep.

Reply to Stargleamer (Original post)

Sat Feb 7, 2026, 08:51 PM

Feb 7

lamp_shade

(15,486 posts)

3. Sure makes sense to me.

Reply to Stargleamer (Original post)

Sat Feb 7, 2026, 09:09 PM

Feb 7

canetoad

(20,769 posts)

4. You'd think those idiots

Reply to Stargleamer (Original post)

Sat Feb 7, 2026, 09:17 PM

Feb 7

Would learn to do word searches properly.

Mark.b2

(799 posts)

5. There should be a law that whoever...

Reply to Stargleamer (Original post)

Sat Feb 7, 2026, 09:21 PM

Feb 7

approves a redaction shall be disclosed in the document in which the redaction occurs for each redaction. EACH instance of redaction shall be given a unique identifier along with a justification. Further, the approver of such redactions shall be potentially subject to inquiry about each redaction identified in the event a court or Congress demands explanation.