Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(131,158 posts)
Tue Feb 10, 2026, 11:39 PM 23 hrs ago

The SAVE Act: a poll tax by another name

The new voter suppression bill—called the "Save America Act"—would require 21 million American citizens to produce passports or birth certificates to register to vote.

Most don't have these documents. This is a poll tax by another name.

#StopTheSaveAct

Nick Knudsen (@nickknudsenus.bsky.social) 2026-02-10T22:26:21.759Z
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The SAVE Act: a poll tax by another name (Original Post) applegrove 23 hrs ago OP
We need to shout about this! Easterncedar 23 hrs ago #1
Yes, the SAVE Act and its intent are in danger of getting lost in the news cycle. Ilikepurple 22 hrs ago #2
I fired off more emails to my two worthless KY senators again tonight Bayard 21 hrs ago #3
Great for you. applegrove 21 hrs ago #4
Gotta hope - and write! Well done Easterncedar 19 hrs ago #5
Also it's discriminatory against women's suffrage. no_hypocrisy 15 hrs ago #6

Easterncedar

(5,828 posts)
1. We need to shout about this!
Tue Feb 10, 2026, 11:55 PM
23 hrs ago

It’s so wrong. Better that a few crooks or fools vote twice than make it hard for any citizen to vote at all. Much less millions.

Ilikepurple

(489 posts)
2. Yes, the SAVE Act and its intent are in danger of getting lost in the news cycle.
Wed Feb 11, 2026, 12:31 AM
22 hrs ago

This story just doesn’t seem to grab people. It’s seems rare to just happen on to a news story about it on the internet. Some will say that they can find stories using google or that they come up in their tailored feed, but that’s really not my point. People have to know to care and as with many things repetition and multiple views ar3 need to engage the viewer. I feel for Nancy Guthrie and her family not just because I’m a sympathetic human being but also because the coverage is relentless. This issue seems pretty far down the media list. I’m not sure how I can help make it bigger other than share my thoughts and click on the articles I do find.

Bayard

(29,023 posts)
3. I fired off more emails to my two worthless KY senators again tonight
Wed Feb 11, 2026, 01:28 AM
21 hrs ago

You never know when Rand Paul is going to turn contrarian again and vote for the right thing.

no_hypocrisy

(54,597 posts)
6. Also it's discriminatory against women's suffrage.
Wed Feb 11, 2026, 08:06 AM
15 hrs ago

With only a few known exceptions that I know of, men don't change their surnames when they marry.

It's unconstitutional as a violation of the 19th Amendment. (The 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1920, prohibits denying the right to vote based on sex, effectively granting women suffrage after decades of activism, though racial barriers to voting for women of color persisted until the Voting Rights Act of 1965. It states, "The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex".)

Constitution trumps federal statute.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The SAVE Act: a poll tax ...