General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe right's latest buzzword is just racism by another name
At the outset, its appropriate to recognize that the recent uptick in rhetoric about the importance of Americas heritage is nothing more than repainted racism. It is no more complicated than Southern insistences that an embrace of the Confederacy is similarly about heritage, when the defining characteristic of the Confederacy was its unrelenting commitment to enslaving Black people.
When we see a social media account for President Donald Trumps White House share a message about being unapologetic in our heritage, we correctly understand that as an extension of making America great again unwinding Americas evolving diversity in favor of a society that continues to hand advantages to whites and men while pretending they are simply the natural state of things.
When we see Trump ally Elon Musk and others insist that this heritage is inextricably white a culture of English-Scotts-Irish origin, in Musks verbiage the point is not hard to perceive.
This language, cribbed in spirit (and, occasionally, actual wording) from white nationalists, gets Americas story willfully wrong. Being American has often been conflated with being white by those in power, largely for self-serving reasons. But the ethnicities placed under the white umbrella have evolved. An America in which Europeans were collectively white and immigration from other places was limited is not the historical norm for the U.S. It was, instead, a mid-20th century aberration.
The baby boom grew up in the whitest, most native-origin population in U.S. history, demographer Douglas Massey explained when we spoke several years ago. In 1970, the percentage foreign-born fell to its lowest point ever in American history, 4.7%. The average immigrant in 1970 was somebodys grandparent.
https://www.ms.now/opinion/elon-musk-white-immigration-american-heritage
That would kind of eliminate Eloon, as he is a Suid-Afrikaner and maybe at least partly DUTCH. And it also ignores the fact that some of our earliest immigrant forebears (mine included) were DUTCH and GERMAN and SWEDISH. So screw them.
Walleye
(44,267 posts)Didnt Mike Johnson take a black boy into his household? Was he using him as a servant?
Aristus
(71,947 posts)Southern-born liberals have known all our lives that, to Southern white supremacists, "heritage" has always meant racism, oppression of people of color, subjugation of women, and the maintaining of white, straight, cisgender men, however competent or incompetent, in positions of social, economic, and political power.
Every time the rednecks, hillbillies, and the evangelical and Baptist God-botherers used the word "heritage" (ad nauseam, I might add), they have meant a nostalgia for, and a determination to restore, ante-bellum white supremacy.
Bottom line.
Hey Joe
(529 posts)You are absolutely correct!
And they can shove their Heritage Society up their asses.
Sideways.
MustBeTheBooz
(359 posts)keep_left
(3,195 posts)...were trying to get started a couple of years ago? IIRC, they wanted to create a white think tank...er...a "heritage" think tank that would advocate for a bleach-bath America. Essentially, no one outside of the whitest, WASPiest enclaves would be acceptable as Americans. If that sounds bizarre...it was. Their argument was that "later" immigrants (Italians, Irish, Eastern Europeans, etc.) were suspect in their loyalties as American citizens. It was like going back 100+ years to a time where Sicilians were just a little too swarthy to be considered "white"; a time when "no Irish need apply".
As one might expect, when word got out about this, it was abandoned pretty quickly. Here's one of the very few articles I could find about this little dustup. I know it got some attention on DU at the time.
https://apnews.com/article/politics-marjorie-taylor-greene-immigration-eefdf9c180f69008d60ed92b9ef2ce03
eppur_se_muova
(41,493 posts)artemisia1
(1,658 posts)for the Confederacy and, literally, only one returned alive. They are part of my ancestry, but NOT my heritage. Heritage implies a continuation of a tradition. Nobody in my family, including long-dead grandparents endorsed that tradition.
If the Confederacy is your "heritage" then you are a white supremacist, imho, PERIOD.
Jilly_in_VA
(14,193 posts)I have LOTS of Scots-Irish and Scottish in my ancestry---about 39% of me is just that. I also had a grandmother who was of 100% German ancestry on one side and mostly English on the other, and a grandfather who was mostly English. My other grandfather was mixed English and Dutch with a little German thrown in for spice. I had ancestors who fought on both sides in the Civil War. I guess that makes me a good All-American MUTT and an unabashed liberal. My husband is just about 100% English, with an ancestry that stretches back to somewhere in the early 1700s in Virginia and heads southwest from there; however, his Ancestry DNA showed 2% West African, which amused him greatly. His ancestors fought for the Confederacy and he was born in Arkansas, something which he would like to forget, and he was raised in Northern VA with a military father. He's almost as liberal as I am.
My kids are German and Scottish/Welsh on their dad's side. My grandkids however, are another story. One is totally Scots-Irish on his mom's side. Three are Puerto Rican on their dad's side and God knows what on their mom's (I don't think, in either case, mom knows anyhow). One is Black, white, and possibly some Native American on his dad's side (he's my daughter's) and his half brother is Puerto Rican on his dad's. The adopted one is black and white on her mom's side and white and Muscokee Creek on her dad's. The other four are Black on mom's side and Puerto Rican on dad's. And I love them all!
Ancestry has nothing to do with "heritage" has nothing to do with one's politics. Oh, and before I forget, my Puerto Rican son-in-law is a raging socialist. He might even be a little left of AOC!
Scott Alan Swaggerty
(245 posts)I would give describe myself a hundred different ways before ever declaring myself or anyone "English-Irish" anything.
Proving, as usual, racists actually know the least about race, culture, anthropology, etc.